Cargando…

Validation of an equine fitness tracker: ECG quality and arrhythmia detection

BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrhythmias in exercising horses are the focus of much interest, both in terms of what is considered normal and potential associations with poor performance and sudden cardiac death. One barrier to performing large‐scale studies is the lack of an easily applicable device, to allo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ter Woort, Fe, Dubois, Guillaume, Tansley, Grace, Didier, Marie, Verdegaal, Elisabeth‐Lidwien, Franklin, Samantha, Van Erck‐Westergren, Emmanuelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35138653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/evj.13565
_version_ 1785020579939614720
author ter Woort, Fe
Dubois, Guillaume
Tansley, Grace
Didier, Marie
Verdegaal, Elisabeth‐Lidwien
Franklin, Samantha
Van Erck‐Westergren, Emmanuelle
author_facet ter Woort, Fe
Dubois, Guillaume
Tansley, Grace
Didier, Marie
Verdegaal, Elisabeth‐Lidwien
Franklin, Samantha
Van Erck‐Westergren, Emmanuelle
author_sort ter Woort, Fe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrhythmias in exercising horses are the focus of much interest, both in terms of what is considered normal and potential associations with poor performance and sudden cardiac death. One barrier to performing large‐scale studies is the lack of an easily applicable device, to allow recording of large numbers of high‐quality exercising electrocardiograms (ECGs). The Equimetre(TM) is a new wearable device, which records a single lead ECG, among other parameters. Validation of such wearable devices is essential before further studies are undertaken. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the quality of ECG using the Equimetre(TM) and compare arrhythmia detection during exercise with the reference Televet(TM) system. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective blinded clinical study. METHODS: Simultaneous ECGs were recorded with both systems in 49 healthy horses during exercise. High‐intensity exercise (>40 km/h) was performed by 29 racehorses, and lower‐intensity exercise for the remainder of the racehorses and show jumpers. Tracings were excluded if >10% artefact was present (duration of artefact relative to duration of exercise). For included ECGs, the duration of artefact was recorded and compared. ECGs were evaluated using Kubios premium software. Arrhythmia detection (yes/no) and arrhythmia classification (sinus arrhythmia, narrow complex of similar morphology to the sinus complexes or wide complex with a different morphology) were compared using Cohen's Kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Nine Televet(TM) ECGs and 3 Equimetre(TM) ECGs were excluded due to artefact >10%. Televet(TM) ECGs included significantly more artefact during exercise than Equimetre(TM) ECGs (5% vs. 0.25% P < .001). Arrhythmia analysis was performed on 38 horses’ paired ECGs. The kappa coefficient was excellent for arrhythmia detection (K = 0.97) and arrhythmia classification (K = 0.93). MAIN LIMITATIONS: Relatively low numbers of horses with arrhythmias (n = 21) were included. The ECG recordings only provided one lead, making arrhythmia classification challenging in some cases. CONCLUSIONS: The Equimetre device provides a reliable ECG for arrhythmia detection during exercise. This system may be useful clinically and for future large‐scale investigations into the occurrence and significance of exercising arrhythmias.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10078706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100787062023-04-07 Validation of an equine fitness tracker: ECG quality and arrhythmia detection ter Woort, Fe Dubois, Guillaume Tansley, Grace Didier, Marie Verdegaal, Elisabeth‐Lidwien Franklin, Samantha Van Erck‐Westergren, Emmanuelle Equine Vet J Technical Notes BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrhythmias in exercising horses are the focus of much interest, both in terms of what is considered normal and potential associations with poor performance and sudden cardiac death. One barrier to performing large‐scale studies is the lack of an easily applicable device, to allow recording of large numbers of high‐quality exercising electrocardiograms (ECGs). The Equimetre(TM) is a new wearable device, which records a single lead ECG, among other parameters. Validation of such wearable devices is essential before further studies are undertaken. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the quality of ECG using the Equimetre(TM) and compare arrhythmia detection during exercise with the reference Televet(TM) system. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective blinded clinical study. METHODS: Simultaneous ECGs were recorded with both systems in 49 healthy horses during exercise. High‐intensity exercise (>40 km/h) was performed by 29 racehorses, and lower‐intensity exercise for the remainder of the racehorses and show jumpers. Tracings were excluded if >10% artefact was present (duration of artefact relative to duration of exercise). For included ECGs, the duration of artefact was recorded and compared. ECGs were evaluated using Kubios premium software. Arrhythmia detection (yes/no) and arrhythmia classification (sinus arrhythmia, narrow complex of similar morphology to the sinus complexes or wide complex with a different morphology) were compared using Cohen's Kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Nine Televet(TM) ECGs and 3 Equimetre(TM) ECGs were excluded due to artefact >10%. Televet(TM) ECGs included significantly more artefact during exercise than Equimetre(TM) ECGs (5% vs. 0.25% P < .001). Arrhythmia analysis was performed on 38 horses’ paired ECGs. The kappa coefficient was excellent for arrhythmia detection (K = 0.97) and arrhythmia classification (K = 0.93). MAIN LIMITATIONS: Relatively low numbers of horses with arrhythmias (n = 21) were included. The ECG recordings only provided one lead, making arrhythmia classification challenging in some cases. CONCLUSIONS: The Equimetre device provides a reliable ECG for arrhythmia detection during exercise. This system may be useful clinically and for future large‐scale investigations into the occurrence and significance of exercising arrhythmias. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-25 2023-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10078706/ /pubmed/35138653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/evj.13565 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Equine Veterinary Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of EVJ Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
ter Woort, Fe
Dubois, Guillaume
Tansley, Grace
Didier, Marie
Verdegaal, Elisabeth‐Lidwien
Franklin, Samantha
Van Erck‐Westergren, Emmanuelle
Validation of an equine fitness tracker: ECG quality and arrhythmia detection
title Validation of an equine fitness tracker: ECG quality and arrhythmia detection
title_full Validation of an equine fitness tracker: ECG quality and arrhythmia detection
title_fullStr Validation of an equine fitness tracker: ECG quality and arrhythmia detection
title_full_unstemmed Validation of an equine fitness tracker: ECG quality and arrhythmia detection
title_short Validation of an equine fitness tracker: ECG quality and arrhythmia detection
title_sort validation of an equine fitness tracker: ecg quality and arrhythmia detection
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35138653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/evj.13565
work_keys_str_mv AT terwoortfe validationofanequinefitnesstrackerecgqualityandarrhythmiadetection
AT duboisguillaume validationofanequinefitnesstrackerecgqualityandarrhythmiadetection
AT tansleygrace validationofanequinefitnesstrackerecgqualityandarrhythmiadetection
AT didiermarie validationofanequinefitnesstrackerecgqualityandarrhythmiadetection
AT verdegaalelisabethlidwien validationofanequinefitnesstrackerecgqualityandarrhythmiadetection
AT franklinsamantha validationofanequinefitnesstrackerecgqualityandarrhythmiadetection
AT vanerckwestergrenemmanuelle validationofanequinefitnesstrackerecgqualityandarrhythmiadetection