Cargando…

Understanding volunteer retention in a complex, community‐centred intervention: A mixed methods study in Ontario, Canada

Volunteers are critical to supporting health care systems worldwide. For organisations that rely on volunteers, service to clients can be disrupted when volunteers leave their roles. Volunteer retention is a multi‐layered phenomenon. In this mixed methods case‐control study, we compared two naturall...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaber, Jessica, Clark, Rebecca E., Lamarche, Larkin, Datta, Julie, Talat, Samina, Bomze, Sivan, Marentette‐Brown, Sarah, Parascandalo, Fiona, Di Pelino, Stephanie, Oliver, Doug, Price, David, Geoffrion, Louise, Mangin, Dee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35253302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13775
_version_ 1785020586041278464
author Gaber, Jessica
Clark, Rebecca E.
Lamarche, Larkin
Datta, Julie
Talat, Samina
Bomze, Sivan
Marentette‐Brown, Sarah
Parascandalo, Fiona
Di Pelino, Stephanie
Oliver, Doug
Price, David
Geoffrion, Louise
Mangin, Dee
author_facet Gaber, Jessica
Clark, Rebecca E.
Lamarche, Larkin
Datta, Julie
Talat, Samina
Bomze, Sivan
Marentette‐Brown, Sarah
Parascandalo, Fiona
Di Pelino, Stephanie
Oliver, Doug
Price, David
Geoffrion, Louise
Mangin, Dee
author_sort Gaber, Jessica
collection PubMed
description Volunteers are critical to supporting health care systems worldwide. For organisations that rely on volunteers, service to clients can be disrupted when volunteers leave their roles. Volunteer retention is a multi‐layered phenomenon. In this mixed methods case‐control study, we compared two naturally‐occurring volunteer groups supporting a complex primary care‐based programme for older adults in the community: volunteers retained by the programme, and volunteers that left. Our objectives were to describe differences between the groups and also understand how compassion changed over time for those that stayed. We collected quantitative data on demographics, the UCLA Geriatric Attitudes Scale, the Professional Quality of Life Index, the Basic Empathy Scale, the Reasons for Volunteering subscale of the Volunteerism Questionnaire and the 5‐level EQ‐5D. Qualitative data were collected through focus groups/interviews. Overall, 78 volunteers completed surveys and 23 participated in focus groups/interviews. Volunteers that stayed were more likely to be a little older and were a slightly higher proportion male than those who left. They also had significantly less positive attitudes towards older adults, descriptively lower Cognitive Empathy and descriptively higher Secondary Traumatic Stress. Compared to volunteers who left, volunteers retained were more likely to have said they were volunteering for Enhancement or Social purposes; however, these differences were non‐significant. Over time, Compassion Satisfaction decreased with a medium effect size for those that stayed, and Burnout decreased with a small effect size. Volunteers that stayed described more logistical and client‐related aspects of the programme were working well. We recommend that volunteer programmes communicate positive programme impacts that could enhance volunteers’ development, communicate any client impacts to volunteers to reinforce volunteers’ purposes for volunteering (thus reinforcing that their work is meaningful), and ensure logistical aspects of volunteer role work well.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10078732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100787322023-04-07 Understanding volunteer retention in a complex, community‐centred intervention: A mixed methods study in Ontario, Canada Gaber, Jessica Clark, Rebecca E. Lamarche, Larkin Datta, Julie Talat, Samina Bomze, Sivan Marentette‐Brown, Sarah Parascandalo, Fiona Di Pelino, Stephanie Oliver, Doug Price, David Geoffrion, Louise Mangin, Dee Health Soc Care Community Original Articles Volunteers are critical to supporting health care systems worldwide. For organisations that rely on volunteers, service to clients can be disrupted when volunteers leave their roles. Volunteer retention is a multi‐layered phenomenon. In this mixed methods case‐control study, we compared two naturally‐occurring volunteer groups supporting a complex primary care‐based programme for older adults in the community: volunteers retained by the programme, and volunteers that left. Our objectives were to describe differences between the groups and also understand how compassion changed over time for those that stayed. We collected quantitative data on demographics, the UCLA Geriatric Attitudes Scale, the Professional Quality of Life Index, the Basic Empathy Scale, the Reasons for Volunteering subscale of the Volunteerism Questionnaire and the 5‐level EQ‐5D. Qualitative data were collected through focus groups/interviews. Overall, 78 volunteers completed surveys and 23 participated in focus groups/interviews. Volunteers that stayed were more likely to be a little older and were a slightly higher proportion male than those who left. They also had significantly less positive attitudes towards older adults, descriptively lower Cognitive Empathy and descriptively higher Secondary Traumatic Stress. Compared to volunteers who left, volunteers retained were more likely to have said they were volunteering for Enhancement or Social purposes; however, these differences were non‐significant. Over time, Compassion Satisfaction decreased with a medium effect size for those that stayed, and Burnout decreased with a small effect size. Volunteers that stayed described more logistical and client‐related aspects of the programme were working well. We recommend that volunteer programmes communicate positive programme impacts that could enhance volunteers’ development, communicate any client impacts to volunteers to reinforce volunteers’ purposes for volunteering (thus reinforcing that their work is meaningful), and ensure logistical aspects of volunteer role work well. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-06 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10078732/ /pubmed/35253302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13775 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Health and Social Care in the Community published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Gaber, Jessica
Clark, Rebecca E.
Lamarche, Larkin
Datta, Julie
Talat, Samina
Bomze, Sivan
Marentette‐Brown, Sarah
Parascandalo, Fiona
Di Pelino, Stephanie
Oliver, Doug
Price, David
Geoffrion, Louise
Mangin, Dee
Understanding volunteer retention in a complex, community‐centred intervention: A mixed methods study in Ontario, Canada
title Understanding volunteer retention in a complex, community‐centred intervention: A mixed methods study in Ontario, Canada
title_full Understanding volunteer retention in a complex, community‐centred intervention: A mixed methods study in Ontario, Canada
title_fullStr Understanding volunteer retention in a complex, community‐centred intervention: A mixed methods study in Ontario, Canada
title_full_unstemmed Understanding volunteer retention in a complex, community‐centred intervention: A mixed methods study in Ontario, Canada
title_short Understanding volunteer retention in a complex, community‐centred intervention: A mixed methods study in Ontario, Canada
title_sort understanding volunteer retention in a complex, community‐centred intervention: a mixed methods study in ontario, canada
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35253302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13775
work_keys_str_mv AT gaberjessica understandingvolunteerretentioninacomplexcommunitycentredinterventionamixedmethodsstudyinontariocanada
AT clarkrebeccae understandingvolunteerretentioninacomplexcommunitycentredinterventionamixedmethodsstudyinontariocanada
AT lamarchelarkin understandingvolunteerretentioninacomplexcommunitycentredinterventionamixedmethodsstudyinontariocanada
AT dattajulie understandingvolunteerretentioninacomplexcommunitycentredinterventionamixedmethodsstudyinontariocanada
AT talatsamina understandingvolunteerretentioninacomplexcommunitycentredinterventionamixedmethodsstudyinontariocanada
AT bomzesivan understandingvolunteerretentioninacomplexcommunitycentredinterventionamixedmethodsstudyinontariocanada
AT marentettebrownsarah understandingvolunteerretentioninacomplexcommunitycentredinterventionamixedmethodsstudyinontariocanada
AT parascandalofiona understandingvolunteerretentioninacomplexcommunitycentredinterventionamixedmethodsstudyinontariocanada
AT dipelinostephanie understandingvolunteerretentioninacomplexcommunitycentredinterventionamixedmethodsstudyinontariocanada
AT oliverdoug understandingvolunteerretentioninacomplexcommunitycentredinterventionamixedmethodsstudyinontariocanada
AT pricedavid understandingvolunteerretentioninacomplexcommunitycentredinterventionamixedmethodsstudyinontariocanada
AT geoffrionlouise understandingvolunteerretentioninacomplexcommunitycentredinterventionamixedmethodsstudyinontariocanada
AT mangindee understandingvolunteerretentioninacomplexcommunitycentredinterventionamixedmethodsstudyinontariocanada