Cargando…

Influence of a major pre‐clinical programme restructure on undergraduate student fixed prosthodontics clinical unit completions

INTRODUCTION: Research is limited in measuring the effectiveness of pre‐clinical programmes in preparing students for fixed prosthodontics clinical practice. The aim of this retrospectively study was to assess the influence of a major pre‐clinical programme restructure on undergraduate student fixed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Dudley, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35181974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eje.12791
_version_ 1785020588673204224
author Dudley, James
author_facet Dudley, James
author_sort Dudley, James
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Research is limited in measuring the effectiveness of pre‐clinical programmes in preparing students for fixed prosthodontics clinical practice. The aim of this retrospectively study was to assess the influence of a major pre‐clinical programme restructure on undergraduate student fixed prosthodontics clinical unit completions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The fixed prosthodontics treatment registers from 2011 to 2020 were reviewed, and units completed per student (UCS) and units completed per student per session (UCSS) were calculated in the years before (2011–2013) and after (2014–2020) a major pre‐clinical programme restructure (PR). Data were summarised in Microsoft Excel software (version 2016), and Student's t‐test and paired t‐tests were performed to determine the significance of difference in UCS and UCSS in the years before and after the PR. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the UCS (p < .05) and UCSS (p < .01) in the years before and after the PR. The average UCS in the years before the PR was 2.20 units compared with 3.86 units after the PR, an increase of 75% per student. The average UCSS in the years before the PR was 0.15 units compared with 0.28 units after the PR, an increase of 87% per session. CONCLUSION: The fixed prosthodontics pre‐clinical programme restructure resulted in statistically significantly increased student clinical unit completions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10078744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100787442023-04-07 Influence of a major pre‐clinical programme restructure on undergraduate student fixed prosthodontics clinical unit completions Dudley, James Eur J Dent Educ Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Research is limited in measuring the effectiveness of pre‐clinical programmes in preparing students for fixed prosthodontics clinical practice. The aim of this retrospectively study was to assess the influence of a major pre‐clinical programme restructure on undergraduate student fixed prosthodontics clinical unit completions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The fixed prosthodontics treatment registers from 2011 to 2020 were reviewed, and units completed per student (UCS) and units completed per student per session (UCSS) were calculated in the years before (2011–2013) and after (2014–2020) a major pre‐clinical programme restructure (PR). Data were summarised in Microsoft Excel software (version 2016), and Student's t‐test and paired t‐tests were performed to determine the significance of difference in UCS and UCSS in the years before and after the PR. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the UCS (p < .05) and UCSS (p < .01) in the years before and after the PR. The average UCS in the years before the PR was 2.20 units compared with 3.86 units after the PR, an increase of 75% per student. The average UCSS in the years before the PR was 0.15 units compared with 0.28 units after the PR, an increase of 87% per session. CONCLUSION: The fixed prosthodontics pre‐clinical programme restructure resulted in statistically significantly increased student clinical unit completions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-24 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10078744/ /pubmed/35181974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eje.12791 Text en © 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Dental Education published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Dudley, James
Influence of a major pre‐clinical programme restructure on undergraduate student fixed prosthodontics clinical unit completions
title Influence of a major pre‐clinical programme restructure on undergraduate student fixed prosthodontics clinical unit completions
title_full Influence of a major pre‐clinical programme restructure on undergraduate student fixed prosthodontics clinical unit completions
title_fullStr Influence of a major pre‐clinical programme restructure on undergraduate student fixed prosthodontics clinical unit completions
title_full_unstemmed Influence of a major pre‐clinical programme restructure on undergraduate student fixed prosthodontics clinical unit completions
title_short Influence of a major pre‐clinical programme restructure on undergraduate student fixed prosthodontics clinical unit completions
title_sort influence of a major pre‐clinical programme restructure on undergraduate student fixed prosthodontics clinical unit completions
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35181974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eje.12791
work_keys_str_mv AT dudleyjames influenceofamajorpreclinicalprogrammerestructureonundergraduatestudentfixedprosthodonticsclinicalunitcompletions