Cargando…

Judicial Self‐Governance Index: Towards better understanding of the role of judges in governing the judiciary

The aim of this article is to introduce a novel view on how to evaluate the share of power held by judges in judicial governance. Its contribution to court administration and the regulation of judges is three‐fold. First, it provides a novel empirically tested conceptualization of judicial governanc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Šipulová, Katarína, Spáč, Samuel, Kosař, David, Papoušková, Tereza, Derka, Viktor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rego.12453
_version_ 1785020598618947584
author Šipulová, Katarína
Spáč, Samuel
Kosař, David
Papoušková, Tereza
Derka, Viktor
author_facet Šipulová, Katarína
Spáč, Samuel
Kosař, David
Papoušková, Tereza
Derka, Viktor
author_sort Šipulová, Katarína
collection PubMed
description The aim of this article is to introduce a novel view on how to evaluate the share of power held by judges in judicial governance. Its contribution to court administration and the regulation of judges is three‐fold. First, it provides a novel empirically tested conceptualization of judicial governance that includes 60 competences grouped into eight dimensions (ranging from selection and education of judges to case allocation and publication of judicial decisions). Second, it proposes a new Judicial Self‐Governance (JSG) Index that measures how much power domestic judges hold in these eight dimensions of judicial governance. Third, by applying the JSG Index to the longitudinal data for Germany, Italy, Czechia, and Slovakia this article demonstrates that the Judicial Council model is not the only institutional model of judicial governance leading to the empowerment of judges. This means that judges can hold many powers without the existence of judicial councils and even in the Ministry of Justice model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10078789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100787892023-04-07 Judicial Self‐Governance Index: Towards better understanding of the role of judges in governing the judiciary Šipulová, Katarína Spáč, Samuel Kosař, David Papoušková, Tereza Derka, Viktor Regul Gov Original Articles The aim of this article is to introduce a novel view on how to evaluate the share of power held by judges in judicial governance. Its contribution to court administration and the regulation of judges is three‐fold. First, it provides a novel empirically tested conceptualization of judicial governance that includes 60 competences grouped into eight dimensions (ranging from selection and education of judges to case allocation and publication of judicial decisions). Second, it proposes a new Judicial Self‐Governance (JSG) Index that measures how much power domestic judges hold in these eight dimensions of judicial governance. Third, by applying the JSG Index to the longitudinal data for Germany, Italy, Czechia, and Slovakia this article demonstrates that the Judicial Council model is not the only institutional model of judicial governance leading to the empowerment of judges. This means that judges can hold many powers without the existence of judicial councils and even in the Ministry of Justice model. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-01-04 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10078789/ /pubmed/37035415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rego.12453 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Regulation & Governance published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Šipulová, Katarína
Spáč, Samuel
Kosař, David
Papoušková, Tereza
Derka, Viktor
Judicial Self‐Governance Index: Towards better understanding of the role of judges in governing the judiciary
title Judicial Self‐Governance Index: Towards better understanding of the role of judges in governing the judiciary
title_full Judicial Self‐Governance Index: Towards better understanding of the role of judges in governing the judiciary
title_fullStr Judicial Self‐Governance Index: Towards better understanding of the role of judges in governing the judiciary
title_full_unstemmed Judicial Self‐Governance Index: Towards better understanding of the role of judges in governing the judiciary
title_short Judicial Self‐Governance Index: Towards better understanding of the role of judges in governing the judiciary
title_sort judicial self‐governance index: towards better understanding of the role of judges in governing the judiciary
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rego.12453
work_keys_str_mv AT sipulovakatarina judicialselfgovernanceindextowardsbetterunderstandingoftheroleofjudgesingoverningthejudiciary
AT spacsamuel judicialselfgovernanceindextowardsbetterunderstandingoftheroleofjudgesingoverningthejudiciary
AT kosardavid judicialselfgovernanceindextowardsbetterunderstandingoftheroleofjudgesingoverningthejudiciary
AT papouskovatereza judicialselfgovernanceindextowardsbetterunderstandingoftheroleofjudgesingoverningthejudiciary
AT derkaviktor judicialselfgovernanceindextowardsbetterunderstandingoftheroleofjudgesingoverningthejudiciary