Cargando…
Judicial Self‐Governance Index: Towards better understanding of the role of judges in governing the judiciary
The aim of this article is to introduce a novel view on how to evaluate the share of power held by judges in judicial governance. Its contribution to court administration and the regulation of judges is three‐fold. First, it provides a novel empirically tested conceptualization of judicial governanc...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rego.12453 |
_version_ | 1785020598618947584 |
---|---|
author | Šipulová, Katarína Spáč, Samuel Kosař, David Papoušková, Tereza Derka, Viktor |
author_facet | Šipulová, Katarína Spáč, Samuel Kosař, David Papoušková, Tereza Derka, Viktor |
author_sort | Šipulová, Katarína |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this article is to introduce a novel view on how to evaluate the share of power held by judges in judicial governance. Its contribution to court administration and the regulation of judges is three‐fold. First, it provides a novel empirically tested conceptualization of judicial governance that includes 60 competences grouped into eight dimensions (ranging from selection and education of judges to case allocation and publication of judicial decisions). Second, it proposes a new Judicial Self‐Governance (JSG) Index that measures how much power domestic judges hold in these eight dimensions of judicial governance. Third, by applying the JSG Index to the longitudinal data for Germany, Italy, Czechia, and Slovakia this article demonstrates that the Judicial Council model is not the only institutional model of judicial governance leading to the empowerment of judges. This means that judges can hold many powers without the existence of judicial councils and even in the Ministry of Justice model. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10078789 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100787892023-04-07 Judicial Self‐Governance Index: Towards better understanding of the role of judges in governing the judiciary Šipulová, Katarína Spáč, Samuel Kosař, David Papoušková, Tereza Derka, Viktor Regul Gov Original Articles The aim of this article is to introduce a novel view on how to evaluate the share of power held by judges in judicial governance. Its contribution to court administration and the regulation of judges is three‐fold. First, it provides a novel empirically tested conceptualization of judicial governance that includes 60 competences grouped into eight dimensions (ranging from selection and education of judges to case allocation and publication of judicial decisions). Second, it proposes a new Judicial Self‐Governance (JSG) Index that measures how much power domestic judges hold in these eight dimensions of judicial governance. Third, by applying the JSG Index to the longitudinal data for Germany, Italy, Czechia, and Slovakia this article demonstrates that the Judicial Council model is not the only institutional model of judicial governance leading to the empowerment of judges. This means that judges can hold many powers without the existence of judicial councils and even in the Ministry of Justice model. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-01-04 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10078789/ /pubmed/37035415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rego.12453 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Regulation & Governance published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Šipulová, Katarína Spáč, Samuel Kosař, David Papoušková, Tereza Derka, Viktor Judicial Self‐Governance Index: Towards better understanding of the role of judges in governing the judiciary |
title | Judicial Self‐Governance Index: Towards better understanding of the role of judges in governing the judiciary |
title_full | Judicial Self‐Governance Index: Towards better understanding of the role of judges in governing the judiciary |
title_fullStr | Judicial Self‐Governance Index: Towards better understanding of the role of judges in governing the judiciary |
title_full_unstemmed | Judicial Self‐Governance Index: Towards better understanding of the role of judges in governing the judiciary |
title_short | Judicial Self‐Governance Index: Towards better understanding of the role of judges in governing the judiciary |
title_sort | judicial self‐governance index: towards better understanding of the role of judges in governing the judiciary |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rego.12453 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sipulovakatarina judicialselfgovernanceindextowardsbetterunderstandingoftheroleofjudgesingoverningthejudiciary AT spacsamuel judicialselfgovernanceindextowardsbetterunderstandingoftheroleofjudgesingoverningthejudiciary AT kosardavid judicialselfgovernanceindextowardsbetterunderstandingoftheroleofjudgesingoverningthejudiciary AT papouskovatereza judicialselfgovernanceindextowardsbetterunderstandingoftheroleofjudgesingoverningthejudiciary AT derkaviktor judicialselfgovernanceindextowardsbetterunderstandingoftheroleofjudgesingoverningthejudiciary |