Cargando…

Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced head-split type humeral fractures and role of the rotator-interval approach

BACKGROUND: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of humeral head split fractures is challenging because of high instability and limited visibility. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the extend of the approach through the rotator interval (RI) on the reduction quality and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fleischhacker, E, Siebenbürger, G, Gleich, J, Helfen, T, Böcker, W, Ockert, B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17585732211065449
_version_ 1785020602210320384
author Fleischhacker, E
Siebenbürger, G
Gleich, J
Helfen, T
Böcker, W
Ockert, B
author_facet Fleischhacker, E
Siebenbürger, G
Gleich, J
Helfen, T
Böcker, W
Ockert, B
author_sort Fleischhacker, E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of humeral head split fractures is challenging because of high instability and limited visibility. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the extend of the approach through the rotator interval (RI) on the reduction quality and functional outcome. METHODS: 37 patients (mean age: 59  ±  16 years,16 female) treated by ORIF through a standard deltopectoral (DP) approach were evaluated. The follow-up period was at least two years. In 17 cases, the approach was extended through the RI. Evaluation was based on radiographs, Constant scores (CS) and DASH scores. RESULTS: In group DP, “anatomic” reduction was achieved in 9 cases (45%), “acceptable” in 5 cases (25%), and “malreduced” in 6 cases (30%). In group RI, “anatomic” reduction was seen in 12 cases (71%), “acceptable” in 5 cases (29%), and “malreduced” in none (p  =  0.04). In the DP group, the CS was 60.2  ±  16.2 and the %CS was 63.9  ±  22.3, while in the RI group, the CS was 74.5  ±  17.4 and the %CS was 79.1  ±  24.1 (p  =  0.07, p  =  0.08). DASH score was 22.8  ±  19.5 in DP compared to RI: 25.2  ±  20.6 (p  =  0.53). CONCLUSIONS: The RI approach improves visualization as it enhances quality of fracture reduction, however functional outcomes may not differ significantly. TYPE OF STUDY AND LEVEL OF PROOF: Retrospective, level III
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10078818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100788182023-04-07 Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced head-split type humeral fractures and role of the rotator-interval approach Fleischhacker, E Siebenbürger, G Gleich, J Helfen, T Böcker, W Ockert, B Shoulder Elbow Shoulder BACKGROUND: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of humeral head split fractures is challenging because of high instability and limited visibility. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the extend of the approach through the rotator interval (RI) on the reduction quality and functional outcome. METHODS: 37 patients (mean age: 59  ±  16 years,16 female) treated by ORIF through a standard deltopectoral (DP) approach were evaluated. The follow-up period was at least two years. In 17 cases, the approach was extended through the RI. Evaluation was based on radiographs, Constant scores (CS) and DASH scores. RESULTS: In group DP, “anatomic” reduction was achieved in 9 cases (45%), “acceptable” in 5 cases (25%), and “malreduced” in 6 cases (30%). In group RI, “anatomic” reduction was seen in 12 cases (71%), “acceptable” in 5 cases (29%), and “malreduced” in none (p  =  0.04). In the DP group, the CS was 60.2  ±  16.2 and the %CS was 63.9  ±  22.3, while in the RI group, the CS was 74.5  ±  17.4 and the %CS was 79.1  ±  24.1 (p  =  0.07, p  =  0.08). DASH score was 22.8  ±  19.5 in DP compared to RI: 25.2  ±  20.6 (p  =  0.53). CONCLUSIONS: The RI approach improves visualization as it enhances quality of fracture reduction, however functional outcomes may not differ significantly. TYPE OF STUDY AND LEVEL OF PROOF: Retrospective, level III SAGE Publications 2021-12-15 2023-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10078818/ /pubmed/37035612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17585732211065449 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Shoulder
Fleischhacker, E
Siebenbürger, G
Gleich, J
Helfen, T
Böcker, W
Ockert, B
Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced head-split type humeral fractures and role of the rotator-interval approach
title Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced head-split type humeral fractures and role of the rotator-interval approach
title_full Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced head-split type humeral fractures and role of the rotator-interval approach
title_fullStr Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced head-split type humeral fractures and role of the rotator-interval approach
title_full_unstemmed Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced head-split type humeral fractures and role of the rotator-interval approach
title_short Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced head-split type humeral fractures and role of the rotator-interval approach
title_sort open reduction and internal fixation of displaced head-split type humeral fractures and role of the rotator-interval approach
topic Shoulder
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17585732211065449
work_keys_str_mv AT fleischhackere openreductionandinternalfixationofdisplacedheadsplittypehumeralfracturesandroleoftherotatorintervalapproach
AT siebenburgerg openreductionandinternalfixationofdisplacedheadsplittypehumeralfracturesandroleoftherotatorintervalapproach
AT gleichj openreductionandinternalfixationofdisplacedheadsplittypehumeralfracturesandroleoftherotatorintervalapproach
AT helfent openreductionandinternalfixationofdisplacedheadsplittypehumeralfracturesandroleoftherotatorintervalapproach
AT bockerw openreductionandinternalfixationofdisplacedheadsplittypehumeralfracturesandroleoftherotatorintervalapproach
AT ockertb openreductionandinternalfixationofdisplacedheadsplittypehumeralfracturesandroleoftherotatorintervalapproach