Cargando…
Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced head-split type humeral fractures and role of the rotator-interval approach
BACKGROUND: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of humeral head split fractures is challenging because of high instability and limited visibility. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the extend of the approach through the rotator interval (RI) on the reduction quality and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17585732211065449 |
_version_ | 1785020602210320384 |
---|---|
author | Fleischhacker, E Siebenbürger, G Gleich, J Helfen, T Böcker, W Ockert, B |
author_facet | Fleischhacker, E Siebenbürger, G Gleich, J Helfen, T Böcker, W Ockert, B |
author_sort | Fleischhacker, E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of humeral head split fractures is challenging because of high instability and limited visibility. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the extend of the approach through the rotator interval (RI) on the reduction quality and functional outcome. METHODS: 37 patients (mean age: 59 ± 16 years,16 female) treated by ORIF through a standard deltopectoral (DP) approach were evaluated. The follow-up period was at least two years. In 17 cases, the approach was extended through the RI. Evaluation was based on radiographs, Constant scores (CS) and DASH scores. RESULTS: In group DP, “anatomic” reduction was achieved in 9 cases (45%), “acceptable” in 5 cases (25%), and “malreduced” in 6 cases (30%). In group RI, “anatomic” reduction was seen in 12 cases (71%), “acceptable” in 5 cases (29%), and “malreduced” in none (p = 0.04). In the DP group, the CS was 60.2 ± 16.2 and the %CS was 63.9 ± 22.3, while in the RI group, the CS was 74.5 ± 17.4 and the %CS was 79.1 ± 24.1 (p = 0.07, p = 0.08). DASH score was 22.8 ± 19.5 in DP compared to RI: 25.2 ± 20.6 (p = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS: The RI approach improves visualization as it enhances quality of fracture reduction, however functional outcomes may not differ significantly. TYPE OF STUDY AND LEVEL OF PROOF: Retrospective, level III |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10078818 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100788182023-04-07 Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced head-split type humeral fractures and role of the rotator-interval approach Fleischhacker, E Siebenbürger, G Gleich, J Helfen, T Böcker, W Ockert, B Shoulder Elbow Shoulder BACKGROUND: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of humeral head split fractures is challenging because of high instability and limited visibility. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the extend of the approach through the rotator interval (RI) on the reduction quality and functional outcome. METHODS: 37 patients (mean age: 59 ± 16 years,16 female) treated by ORIF through a standard deltopectoral (DP) approach were evaluated. The follow-up period was at least two years. In 17 cases, the approach was extended through the RI. Evaluation was based on radiographs, Constant scores (CS) and DASH scores. RESULTS: In group DP, “anatomic” reduction was achieved in 9 cases (45%), “acceptable” in 5 cases (25%), and “malreduced” in 6 cases (30%). In group RI, “anatomic” reduction was seen in 12 cases (71%), “acceptable” in 5 cases (29%), and “malreduced” in none (p = 0.04). In the DP group, the CS was 60.2 ± 16.2 and the %CS was 63.9 ± 22.3, while in the RI group, the CS was 74.5 ± 17.4 and the %CS was 79.1 ± 24.1 (p = 0.07, p = 0.08). DASH score was 22.8 ± 19.5 in DP compared to RI: 25.2 ± 20.6 (p = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS: The RI approach improves visualization as it enhances quality of fracture reduction, however functional outcomes may not differ significantly. TYPE OF STUDY AND LEVEL OF PROOF: Retrospective, level III SAGE Publications 2021-12-15 2023-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10078818/ /pubmed/37035612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17585732211065449 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Shoulder Fleischhacker, E Siebenbürger, G Gleich, J Helfen, T Böcker, W Ockert, B Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced head-split type humeral fractures and role of the rotator-interval approach |
title | Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced head-split type humeral fractures and role of the rotator-interval approach |
title_full | Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced head-split type humeral fractures and role of the rotator-interval approach |
title_fullStr | Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced head-split type humeral fractures and role of the rotator-interval approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced head-split type humeral fractures and role of the rotator-interval approach |
title_short | Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced head-split type humeral fractures and role of the rotator-interval approach |
title_sort | open reduction and internal fixation of displaced head-split type humeral fractures and role of the rotator-interval approach |
topic | Shoulder |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17585732211065449 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fleischhackere openreductionandinternalfixationofdisplacedheadsplittypehumeralfracturesandroleoftherotatorintervalapproach AT siebenburgerg openreductionandinternalfixationofdisplacedheadsplittypehumeralfracturesandroleoftherotatorintervalapproach AT gleichj openreductionandinternalfixationofdisplacedheadsplittypehumeralfracturesandroleoftherotatorintervalapproach AT helfent openreductionandinternalfixationofdisplacedheadsplittypehumeralfracturesandroleoftherotatorintervalapproach AT bockerw openreductionandinternalfixationofdisplacedheadsplittypehumeralfracturesandroleoftherotatorintervalapproach AT ockertb openreductionandinternalfixationofdisplacedheadsplittypehumeralfracturesandroleoftherotatorintervalapproach |