Cargando…

Implementation of automated personalised breast radiotherapy planning techniques with scripting in Raystation

OBJECTIVE: Implement scripted automatic breast planning (AP) for breast techniques within Raystation. METHODS: Manual plans (MPs) were re-planned and compared with AP plans for whole breast (WB), partial breast (PB), hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy simultaneous integrated boost (VMAT SIB) an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gleeson, Ian, Bolger, Niall, Chun, Harmony, Hutchinson, Katie, Klodowska, Magdalena, Mehrer, Jennifer, Toomey, Marian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36728760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220707
_version_ 1785020609730707456
author Gleeson, Ian
Bolger, Niall
Chun, Harmony
Hutchinson, Katie
Klodowska, Magdalena
Mehrer, Jennifer
Toomey, Marian
author_facet Gleeson, Ian
Bolger, Niall
Chun, Harmony
Hutchinson, Katie
Klodowska, Magdalena
Mehrer, Jennifer
Toomey, Marian
author_sort Gleeson, Ian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Implement scripted automatic breast planning (AP) for breast techniques within Raystation. METHODS: Manual plans (MPs) were re-planned and compared with AP plans for whole breast (WB), partial breast (PB), hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy simultaneous integrated boost (VMAT SIB) and VMAT nodal plans. RESULTS: WB AP plans took 7 min comparing well to MP. One WB AP failed a mandatory dose constraint. Small statistically significant differences showed improved coverage for AP at expense of slightly hotter plans, however absolute differences were small (mean differences < 1% or D (0.5cc)<0.2 Gy). PB AP plans took 9 min, showing improved coverage (V (24.7Gy)97.6 vs 96.4 %). One PB AP case failed a mandatory constraint. Other dosimetric differences were non-significant. SIB AP plans took 14 min with one case failing a mandatory constraint with minor differences compared with MP except larger V (42.8Gy) (3 vs 1.5 %) and more MU. VMAT AP plans took 12 min and were hotter for PTVp_4000 but had higher nodal coverage. Contra_Lung V (2.5Gy) was higher (8.8 %) than MP plans (6.5 %). CONCLUSION: Automatic planning of modern breast techniques has been successfully introduced using a commercial planning system. AP plans are very similar to MP, requiring little manual interaction for most cases with significant timesaving potential. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Scripted breast plans produced within minutes for WB, PB, SIB and VMAT. Successfully introduced into large busy department. Plans similar to manual plans, requiring little manual interaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10078863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100788632023-04-07 Implementation of automated personalised breast radiotherapy planning techniques with scripting in Raystation Gleeson, Ian Bolger, Niall Chun, Harmony Hutchinson, Katie Klodowska, Magdalena Mehrer, Jennifer Toomey, Marian Br J Radiol Full Paper OBJECTIVE: Implement scripted automatic breast planning (AP) for breast techniques within Raystation. METHODS: Manual plans (MPs) were re-planned and compared with AP plans for whole breast (WB), partial breast (PB), hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy simultaneous integrated boost (VMAT SIB) and VMAT nodal plans. RESULTS: WB AP plans took 7 min comparing well to MP. One WB AP failed a mandatory dose constraint. Small statistically significant differences showed improved coverage for AP at expense of slightly hotter plans, however absolute differences were small (mean differences < 1% or D (0.5cc)<0.2 Gy). PB AP plans took 9 min, showing improved coverage (V (24.7Gy)97.6 vs 96.4 %). One PB AP case failed a mandatory constraint. Other dosimetric differences were non-significant. SIB AP plans took 14 min with one case failing a mandatory constraint with minor differences compared with MP except larger V (42.8Gy) (3 vs 1.5 %) and more MU. VMAT AP plans took 12 min and were hotter for PTVp_4000 but had higher nodal coverage. Contra_Lung V (2.5Gy) was higher (8.8 %) than MP plans (6.5 %). CONCLUSION: Automatic planning of modern breast techniques has been successfully introduced using a commercial planning system. AP plans are very similar to MP, requiring little manual interaction for most cases with significant timesaving potential. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Scripted breast plans produced within minutes for WB, PB, SIB and VMAT. Successfully introduced into large busy department. Plans similar to manual plans, requiring little manual interaction. The British Institute of Radiology. 2023-04-01 2023-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10078863/ /pubmed/36728760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220707 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Full Paper
Gleeson, Ian
Bolger, Niall
Chun, Harmony
Hutchinson, Katie
Klodowska, Magdalena
Mehrer, Jennifer
Toomey, Marian
Implementation of automated personalised breast radiotherapy planning techniques with scripting in Raystation
title Implementation of automated personalised breast radiotherapy planning techniques with scripting in Raystation
title_full Implementation of automated personalised breast radiotherapy planning techniques with scripting in Raystation
title_fullStr Implementation of automated personalised breast radiotherapy planning techniques with scripting in Raystation
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of automated personalised breast radiotherapy planning techniques with scripting in Raystation
title_short Implementation of automated personalised breast radiotherapy planning techniques with scripting in Raystation
title_sort implementation of automated personalised breast radiotherapy planning techniques with scripting in raystation
topic Full Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36728760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220707
work_keys_str_mv AT gleesonian implementationofautomatedpersonalisedbreastradiotherapyplanningtechniqueswithscriptinginraystation
AT bolgerniall implementationofautomatedpersonalisedbreastradiotherapyplanningtechniqueswithscriptinginraystation
AT chunharmony implementationofautomatedpersonalisedbreastradiotherapyplanningtechniqueswithscriptinginraystation
AT hutchinsonkatie implementationofautomatedpersonalisedbreastradiotherapyplanningtechniqueswithscriptinginraystation
AT klodowskamagdalena implementationofautomatedpersonalisedbreastradiotherapyplanningtechniqueswithscriptinginraystation
AT mehrerjennifer implementationofautomatedpersonalisedbreastradiotherapyplanningtechniqueswithscriptinginraystation
AT toomeymarian implementationofautomatedpersonalisedbreastradiotherapyplanningtechniqueswithscriptinginraystation