Cargando…
Comparison between Protocols for Management of Fetal Growth Restriction
This comprehensive review compares clinical protocols of important entities regarding the management of fetal growth restriction (FGR), published since 2015. Five protocols were chosen for data extraction. There were no relevant differences regarding the diagnosis and classification of FGR between t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078887/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36977407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1764493 |
_version_ | 1785020612583882752 |
---|---|
author | Leal, Caio Ribeiro Vieira Rezende, Karen Pereira Macedo, Evilane do Carmo Patrício de Rezende, Guilherme de Castro Corrêa Júnior, Mário Dias |
author_facet | Leal, Caio Ribeiro Vieira Rezende, Karen Pereira Macedo, Evilane do Carmo Patrício de Rezende, Guilherme de Castro Corrêa Júnior, Mário Dias |
author_sort | Leal, Caio Ribeiro Vieira |
collection | PubMed |
description | This comprehensive review compares clinical protocols of important entities regarding the management of fetal growth restriction (FGR), published since 2015. Five protocols were chosen for data extraction. There were no relevant differences regarding the diagnosis and classification of FGR between the protocols. In general, all protocols suggest that the assessment of fetal vitality must be performed in a multimodally, associating biophysical parameters (such as cardiotocography and fetal biophysical profile) with the Doppler velocimetry parameters of the umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery, and ductus venosus. All protocols reinforce that the more severe the fetal condition, the more frequent this assessment should be made. The timely gestational age and mode of delivery to terminate the pregnancy in these cases can vary much between the protocols. Therefore, this paper presents, in a didactic way, the particularities of different protocols for monitoring FGR, in order to help obstetricians to better manage the cases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10078887 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100788872023-07-27 Comparison between Protocols for Management of Fetal Growth Restriction Leal, Caio Ribeiro Vieira Rezende, Karen Pereira Macedo, Evilane do Carmo Patrício de Rezende, Guilherme de Castro Corrêa Júnior, Mário Dias Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet This comprehensive review compares clinical protocols of important entities regarding the management of fetal growth restriction (FGR), published since 2015. Five protocols were chosen for data extraction. There were no relevant differences regarding the diagnosis and classification of FGR between the protocols. In general, all protocols suggest that the assessment of fetal vitality must be performed in a multimodally, associating biophysical parameters (such as cardiotocography and fetal biophysical profile) with the Doppler velocimetry parameters of the umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery, and ductus venosus. All protocols reinforce that the more severe the fetal condition, the more frequent this assessment should be made. The timely gestational age and mode of delivery to terminate the pregnancy in these cases can vary much between the protocols. Therefore, this paper presents, in a didactic way, the particularities of different protocols for monitoring FGR, in order to help obstetricians to better manage the cases. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2023-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10078887/ /pubmed/36977407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1764493 Text en Federação Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Leal, Caio Ribeiro Vieira Rezende, Karen Pereira Macedo, Evilane do Carmo Patrício de Rezende, Guilherme de Castro Corrêa Júnior, Mário Dias Comparison between Protocols for Management of Fetal Growth Restriction |
title | Comparison between Protocols for Management of Fetal Growth Restriction |
title_full | Comparison between Protocols for Management of Fetal Growth Restriction |
title_fullStr | Comparison between Protocols for Management of Fetal Growth Restriction |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between Protocols for Management of Fetal Growth Restriction |
title_short | Comparison between Protocols for Management of Fetal Growth Restriction |
title_sort | comparison between protocols for management of fetal growth restriction |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078887/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36977407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1764493 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lealcaioribeirovieira comparisonbetweenprotocolsformanagementoffetalgrowthrestriction AT rezendekarenpereira comparisonbetweenprotocolsformanagementoffetalgrowthrestriction AT macedoevilanedocarmopatriciode comparisonbetweenprotocolsformanagementoffetalgrowthrestriction AT rezendeguilhermedecastro comparisonbetweenprotocolsformanagementoffetalgrowthrestriction AT correajuniormariodias comparisonbetweenprotocolsformanagementoffetalgrowthrestriction |