Cargando…

Expanding Indications of the Medial Femoral Condyle Free Flap: Systematic Review in Head and Neck Reconstruction

The medial femoral condyle free flap serves as an attractive reconstructive option for small- to intermediate-sized bony defects. It is commonly applied in the extremities with limited reports in the head and neck. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed using the Preferred Repo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Niki K., Tipps, John A., Bartlett, Scott P., Kovach, Stephen J., Levin, L. Scott, Mendenhall, Shaun D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10079347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004925
_version_ 1785020709289852928
author Patel, Niki K.
Tipps, John A.
Bartlett, Scott P.
Kovach, Stephen J.
Levin, L. Scott
Mendenhall, Shaun D.
author_facet Patel, Niki K.
Tipps, John A.
Bartlett, Scott P.
Kovach, Stephen J.
Levin, L. Scott
Mendenhall, Shaun D.
author_sort Patel, Niki K.
collection PubMed
description The medial femoral condyle free flap serves as an attractive reconstructive option for small- to intermediate-sized bony defects. It is commonly applied in the extremities with limited reports in the head and neck. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS: Seventeen articles met inclusion criteria, yielding 166 cases for analysis, with a majority of the cohort from a single study (n = 107; 64.4%). However, all included studies represented novel reconstructive sites and surgical indications. Flap components were described in 157 cases; periosteum was used only in four cases (2.5%), whereas all others are composed of cortical bone combined with periosteum, cancellous bone, and/or cartilage (97.5%). Additionally, a skin island was used in 43 cases (25.9%). Flap measurements were reported in 51 cases, averaging 4.5 ± 2.7 cm in length. Seven cases listed skin island dimensions, averaging 20.2 ± 12.8 cm(2). The descending genicular artery was the primary pedicle employed (n = 162; 97.6%), while the superior medial genicular was used in the descending genicular artery’s absence (n = 4; 2.4%). Descending genicular artery pedicle length from 15 reporting cases averaged 6.4 ± 1.2 cm. Successful reconstructions totaled 160 cases (96.4%). Recipient complications were seen in 16 cases (9.6%) with six constituting flap failures (3.6%). Donor site complications were minimal (n = 6; 3.6%); however, this included one major complication of femoral shaft fracture. CONCLUSION: The medial femoral condyle free flap is an effective reconstructive option for the head and neck due to its versatile nature, low complication profile at both recipient and donor site, ease of harvest, and two-team approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10079347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100793472023-04-07 Expanding Indications of the Medial Femoral Condyle Free Flap: Systematic Review in Head and Neck Reconstruction Patel, Niki K. Tipps, John A. Bartlett, Scott P. Kovach, Stephen J. Levin, L. Scott Mendenhall, Shaun D. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Reconstructive The medial femoral condyle free flap serves as an attractive reconstructive option for small- to intermediate-sized bony defects. It is commonly applied in the extremities with limited reports in the head and neck. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS: Seventeen articles met inclusion criteria, yielding 166 cases for analysis, with a majority of the cohort from a single study (n = 107; 64.4%). However, all included studies represented novel reconstructive sites and surgical indications. Flap components were described in 157 cases; periosteum was used only in four cases (2.5%), whereas all others are composed of cortical bone combined with periosteum, cancellous bone, and/or cartilage (97.5%). Additionally, a skin island was used in 43 cases (25.9%). Flap measurements were reported in 51 cases, averaging 4.5 ± 2.7 cm in length. Seven cases listed skin island dimensions, averaging 20.2 ± 12.8 cm(2). The descending genicular artery was the primary pedicle employed (n = 162; 97.6%), while the superior medial genicular was used in the descending genicular artery’s absence (n = 4; 2.4%). Descending genicular artery pedicle length from 15 reporting cases averaged 6.4 ± 1.2 cm. Successful reconstructions totaled 160 cases (96.4%). Recipient complications were seen in 16 cases (9.6%) with six constituting flap failures (3.6%). Donor site complications were minimal (n = 6; 3.6%); however, this included one major complication of femoral shaft fracture. CONCLUSION: The medial femoral condyle free flap is an effective reconstructive option for the head and neck due to its versatile nature, low complication profile at both recipient and donor site, ease of harvest, and two-team approach. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10079347/ /pubmed/37035122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004925 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Reconstructive
Patel, Niki K.
Tipps, John A.
Bartlett, Scott P.
Kovach, Stephen J.
Levin, L. Scott
Mendenhall, Shaun D.
Expanding Indications of the Medial Femoral Condyle Free Flap: Systematic Review in Head and Neck Reconstruction
title Expanding Indications of the Medial Femoral Condyle Free Flap: Systematic Review in Head and Neck Reconstruction
title_full Expanding Indications of the Medial Femoral Condyle Free Flap: Systematic Review in Head and Neck Reconstruction
title_fullStr Expanding Indications of the Medial Femoral Condyle Free Flap: Systematic Review in Head and Neck Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Expanding Indications of the Medial Femoral Condyle Free Flap: Systematic Review in Head and Neck Reconstruction
title_short Expanding Indications of the Medial Femoral Condyle Free Flap: Systematic Review in Head and Neck Reconstruction
title_sort expanding indications of the medial femoral condyle free flap: systematic review in head and neck reconstruction
topic Reconstructive
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10079347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004925
work_keys_str_mv AT patelnikik expandingindicationsofthemedialfemoralcondylefreeflapsystematicreviewinheadandneckreconstruction
AT tippsjohna expandingindicationsofthemedialfemoralcondylefreeflapsystematicreviewinheadandneckreconstruction
AT bartlettscottp expandingindicationsofthemedialfemoralcondylefreeflapsystematicreviewinheadandneckreconstruction
AT kovachstephenj expandingindicationsofthemedialfemoralcondylefreeflapsystematicreviewinheadandneckreconstruction
AT levinlscott expandingindicationsofthemedialfemoralcondylefreeflapsystematicreviewinheadandneckreconstruction
AT mendenhallshaund expandingindicationsofthemedialfemoralcondylefreeflapsystematicreviewinheadandneckreconstruction