Cargando…
Quantum-resistance in blockchain networks
The advent of quantum computing threatens blockchain protocols and networks because they utilize non-quantum resistant cryptographic algorithms. When quantum computers become robust enough to run Shor’s algorithm on a large scale, the most used asymmetric algorithms, utilized for digital signatures...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10079930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37024656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32701-6 |
_version_ | 1785020811905597440 |
---|---|
author | Allende, Marcos León, Diego López Cerón, Sergio Pareja, Adrián Pacheco, Erick Leal, Antonio Da Silva, Marcelo Pardo, Alejandro Jones, Duncan Worrall, David J. Merriman, Ben Gilmore, Jonathan Kitchener, Nick Venegas-Andraca, Salvador E. |
author_facet | Allende, Marcos León, Diego López Cerón, Sergio Pareja, Adrián Pacheco, Erick Leal, Antonio Da Silva, Marcelo Pardo, Alejandro Jones, Duncan Worrall, David J. Merriman, Ben Gilmore, Jonathan Kitchener, Nick Venegas-Andraca, Salvador E. |
author_sort | Allende, Marcos |
collection | PubMed |
description | The advent of quantum computing threatens blockchain protocols and networks because they utilize non-quantum resistant cryptographic algorithms. When quantum computers become robust enough to run Shor’s algorithm on a large scale, the most used asymmetric algorithms, utilized for digital signatures and message encryption, such as RSA, (EC)DSA, and (EC)DH, will be no longer secure. Quantum computers will be able to break them within a short period of time. Similarly, Grover’s algorithm concedes a quadratic advantage for mining blocks in certain consensus protocols such as proof of work. Today, there are hundreds of billions of dollars denominated in cryptocurrencies and other digital assets that rely on blockchain ledgers as well as thousands of blockchain-based applications storing value in blockchain networks. Cryptocurrencies and blockchain-based applications require solutions that guarantee quantum resistance in order to preserve the integrity of data and assets in these public and immutable ledgers. The quantum threat and some potential solutions are well understood and presented in the literature. However, most proposals are theoretical, require large QKD networks, or propose new quantum-resistant blockchain networks to be built from scratch. Our work, which is presented in this paper, is pioneer in proposing an end-to-end framework for post-quantum blockchain networks that can be applied to existing blockchain to achieve quantum-resistance. We have developed an open-source implementation in an Ethereum-based (i.e., EVM compatible) network that can be extended to other existing blockchains. For the implementation we have (i) used quantum entropy to generate post-quantum key pairs, (ii) established post-quantum TLS connections and X.509 certificates to secure the exchange of information between blockchain nodes over the internet without needing a large QKD network, (iii) introduced a post-quantum second signature in transactions using Falcon-512 post-quantum keys, and (iv) developed the first on-chain verification of post-quantum signatures using three different mechanisms that are compared and analyzed: Solidity smart-contracts run by the validators for each transaction, modified EVM Opcode, and precompiled smart contracts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10079930 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100799302023-04-08 Quantum-resistance in blockchain networks Allende, Marcos León, Diego López Cerón, Sergio Pareja, Adrián Pacheco, Erick Leal, Antonio Da Silva, Marcelo Pardo, Alejandro Jones, Duncan Worrall, David J. Merriman, Ben Gilmore, Jonathan Kitchener, Nick Venegas-Andraca, Salvador E. Sci Rep Article The advent of quantum computing threatens blockchain protocols and networks because they utilize non-quantum resistant cryptographic algorithms. When quantum computers become robust enough to run Shor’s algorithm on a large scale, the most used asymmetric algorithms, utilized for digital signatures and message encryption, such as RSA, (EC)DSA, and (EC)DH, will be no longer secure. Quantum computers will be able to break them within a short period of time. Similarly, Grover’s algorithm concedes a quadratic advantage for mining blocks in certain consensus protocols such as proof of work. Today, there are hundreds of billions of dollars denominated in cryptocurrencies and other digital assets that rely on blockchain ledgers as well as thousands of blockchain-based applications storing value in blockchain networks. Cryptocurrencies and blockchain-based applications require solutions that guarantee quantum resistance in order to preserve the integrity of data and assets in these public and immutable ledgers. The quantum threat and some potential solutions are well understood and presented in the literature. However, most proposals are theoretical, require large QKD networks, or propose new quantum-resistant blockchain networks to be built from scratch. Our work, which is presented in this paper, is pioneer in proposing an end-to-end framework for post-quantum blockchain networks that can be applied to existing blockchain to achieve quantum-resistance. We have developed an open-source implementation in an Ethereum-based (i.e., EVM compatible) network that can be extended to other existing blockchains. For the implementation we have (i) used quantum entropy to generate post-quantum key pairs, (ii) established post-quantum TLS connections and X.509 certificates to secure the exchange of information between blockchain nodes over the internet without needing a large QKD network, (iii) introduced a post-quantum second signature in transactions using Falcon-512 post-quantum keys, and (iv) developed the first on-chain verification of post-quantum signatures using three different mechanisms that are compared and analyzed: Solidity smart-contracts run by the validators for each transaction, modified EVM Opcode, and precompiled smart contracts. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10079930/ /pubmed/37024656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32701-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Allende, Marcos León, Diego López Cerón, Sergio Pareja, Adrián Pacheco, Erick Leal, Antonio Da Silva, Marcelo Pardo, Alejandro Jones, Duncan Worrall, David J. Merriman, Ben Gilmore, Jonathan Kitchener, Nick Venegas-Andraca, Salvador E. Quantum-resistance in blockchain networks |
title | Quantum-resistance in blockchain networks |
title_full | Quantum-resistance in blockchain networks |
title_fullStr | Quantum-resistance in blockchain networks |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantum-resistance in blockchain networks |
title_short | Quantum-resistance in blockchain networks |
title_sort | quantum-resistance in blockchain networks |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10079930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37024656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32701-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT allendemarcos quantumresistanceinblockchainnetworks AT leondiegolopez quantumresistanceinblockchainnetworks AT ceronsergio quantumresistanceinblockchainnetworks AT parejaadrian quantumresistanceinblockchainnetworks AT pachecoerick quantumresistanceinblockchainnetworks AT lealantonio quantumresistanceinblockchainnetworks AT dasilvamarcelo quantumresistanceinblockchainnetworks AT pardoalejandro quantumresistanceinblockchainnetworks AT jonesduncan quantumresistanceinblockchainnetworks AT worralldavidj quantumresistanceinblockchainnetworks AT merrimanben quantumresistanceinblockchainnetworks AT gilmorejonathan quantumresistanceinblockchainnetworks AT kitchenernick quantumresistanceinblockchainnetworks AT venegasandracasalvadore quantumresistanceinblockchainnetworks |