Cargando…

The nutritional quality of a fresh orange pulp-wheat straw mixture ensiled with either sugar beet pulp, wheat bran, or urea compared to corn silage (Zea mays) in sheep

This study compares corn silage (CS) with an orange pulp-wheat straw mixture (OW) ensiled with either sugar beet pulp (SBP), wheat bran (WB), or urea in terms of intake, chemical composition, phenolic compounds, silage fermentation characteristics, digestibility, in vivo rumen variables and biochemi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dadashi, Ali, Rouzbehan, Yousef, Fazaeli, Hassan, Rezaei, Javad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10080190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37033299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txad017
_version_ 1785020872462958592
author Dadashi, Ali
Rouzbehan, Yousef
Fazaeli, Hassan
Rezaei, Javad
author_facet Dadashi, Ali
Rouzbehan, Yousef
Fazaeli, Hassan
Rezaei, Javad
author_sort Dadashi, Ali
collection PubMed
description This study compares corn silage (CS) with an orange pulp-wheat straw mixture (OW) ensiled with either sugar beet pulp (SBP), wheat bran (WB), or urea in terms of intake, chemical composition, phenolic compounds, silage fermentation characteristics, digestibility, in vivo rumen variables and biochemical blood variables in 48 Shall male sheep, and in vitro methane (CH(4)) production. In addition to CS, five other silages: OW (i.e., 87.5% fresh orange pulp + 12.5% wheat straw); OWU (OW + 1% urea); OWS (87.5% fresh orange pulp + 8.6% wheat straw + 3.9% SBP); OWSU (87.5% fresh orange pulp + 8.6% wheat straw + 1% urea + 3.9% SBP); and OWB (87.5% fresh orange pulp + 8.6% wheat straw + 3.9% SBP) were ensiled for 90 days. All diets, which contained a mineral-vitamin premix (10 g/kg of dry matter [DM]), were each randomly assigned to five sheep (live weight 40 ± 2.5 kg) using a completely randomized design, and the SAS software MIXED method was used for data analysis. Among all silages, OWU and OWSU had the highest (P < 0.01) ammonia-N concentration, but there were no differences in other fermentation characteristics. Animals fed on the CS diet had higher DM intake (P = 0.01) and DM (P = 0.01), organic matter (P = 0.01), and neutral detergent fiber (P = 0.02) digestibilities compared with other diets. However, sheep receiving OWU and OWSU diets had higher (P < 0.01) crude protein digestibility than those fed on other diets. The OWU and OWSU-fed sheep had the highest (P = 0.04) ruminal ammonia-N concentration. Sheep fed on CS had higher (P = 0.03) ruminal total short-chain fatty acids, acetate concentration (P = 0.02), total protozoa (P < 0.01), and cellulolytic bacteria numbers (P < 0.01), but had a lower (P = 0.03) propionate concentration compared with the other sheep. In vitro CH(4) production was higher (P = 0.01) with the CS diet compared to the orange pulp diets. Estimated microbial protein supply was lower (P = 0.05) with CS compared to all orange silages. In conclusion, the variation in the nutritive quality among the OWS, OWSU, and OWB is relatively small, and the OWB, which is most comparable to CS, was judged to be nutritionally the best among the diets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10080190
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100801902023-04-08 The nutritional quality of a fresh orange pulp-wheat straw mixture ensiled with either sugar beet pulp, wheat bran, or urea compared to corn silage (Zea mays) in sheep Dadashi, Ali Rouzbehan, Yousef Fazaeli, Hassan Rezaei, Javad Transl Anim Sci Ruminant Nutrition This study compares corn silage (CS) with an orange pulp-wheat straw mixture (OW) ensiled with either sugar beet pulp (SBP), wheat bran (WB), or urea in terms of intake, chemical composition, phenolic compounds, silage fermentation characteristics, digestibility, in vivo rumen variables and biochemical blood variables in 48 Shall male sheep, and in vitro methane (CH(4)) production. In addition to CS, five other silages: OW (i.e., 87.5% fresh orange pulp + 12.5% wheat straw); OWU (OW + 1% urea); OWS (87.5% fresh orange pulp + 8.6% wheat straw + 3.9% SBP); OWSU (87.5% fresh orange pulp + 8.6% wheat straw + 1% urea + 3.9% SBP); and OWB (87.5% fresh orange pulp + 8.6% wheat straw + 3.9% SBP) were ensiled for 90 days. All diets, which contained a mineral-vitamin premix (10 g/kg of dry matter [DM]), were each randomly assigned to five sheep (live weight 40 ± 2.5 kg) using a completely randomized design, and the SAS software MIXED method was used for data analysis. Among all silages, OWU and OWSU had the highest (P < 0.01) ammonia-N concentration, but there were no differences in other fermentation characteristics. Animals fed on the CS diet had higher DM intake (P = 0.01) and DM (P = 0.01), organic matter (P = 0.01), and neutral detergent fiber (P = 0.02) digestibilities compared with other diets. However, sheep receiving OWU and OWSU diets had higher (P < 0.01) crude protein digestibility than those fed on other diets. The OWU and OWSU-fed sheep had the highest (P = 0.04) ruminal ammonia-N concentration. Sheep fed on CS had higher (P = 0.03) ruminal total short-chain fatty acids, acetate concentration (P = 0.02), total protozoa (P < 0.01), and cellulolytic bacteria numbers (P < 0.01), but had a lower (P = 0.03) propionate concentration compared with the other sheep. In vitro CH(4) production was higher (P = 0.01) with the CS diet compared to the orange pulp diets. Estimated microbial protein supply was lower (P = 0.05) with CS compared to all orange silages. In conclusion, the variation in the nutritive quality among the OWS, OWSU, and OWB is relatively small, and the OWB, which is most comparable to CS, was judged to be nutritionally the best among the diets. Oxford University Press 2023-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10080190/ /pubmed/37033299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txad017 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Ruminant Nutrition
Dadashi, Ali
Rouzbehan, Yousef
Fazaeli, Hassan
Rezaei, Javad
The nutritional quality of a fresh orange pulp-wheat straw mixture ensiled with either sugar beet pulp, wheat bran, or urea compared to corn silage (Zea mays) in sheep
title The nutritional quality of a fresh orange pulp-wheat straw mixture ensiled with either sugar beet pulp, wheat bran, or urea compared to corn silage (Zea mays) in sheep
title_full The nutritional quality of a fresh orange pulp-wheat straw mixture ensiled with either sugar beet pulp, wheat bran, or urea compared to corn silage (Zea mays) in sheep
title_fullStr The nutritional quality of a fresh orange pulp-wheat straw mixture ensiled with either sugar beet pulp, wheat bran, or urea compared to corn silage (Zea mays) in sheep
title_full_unstemmed The nutritional quality of a fresh orange pulp-wheat straw mixture ensiled with either sugar beet pulp, wheat bran, or urea compared to corn silage (Zea mays) in sheep
title_short The nutritional quality of a fresh orange pulp-wheat straw mixture ensiled with either sugar beet pulp, wheat bran, or urea compared to corn silage (Zea mays) in sheep
title_sort nutritional quality of a fresh orange pulp-wheat straw mixture ensiled with either sugar beet pulp, wheat bran, or urea compared to corn silage (zea mays) in sheep
topic Ruminant Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10080190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37033299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txad017
work_keys_str_mv AT dadashiali thenutritionalqualityofafreshorangepulpwheatstrawmixtureensiledwitheithersugarbeetpulpwheatbranorureacomparedtocornsilagezeamaysinsheep
AT rouzbehanyousef thenutritionalqualityofafreshorangepulpwheatstrawmixtureensiledwitheithersugarbeetpulpwheatbranorureacomparedtocornsilagezeamaysinsheep
AT fazaelihassan thenutritionalqualityofafreshorangepulpwheatstrawmixtureensiledwitheithersugarbeetpulpwheatbranorureacomparedtocornsilagezeamaysinsheep
AT rezaeijavad thenutritionalqualityofafreshorangepulpwheatstrawmixtureensiledwitheithersugarbeetpulpwheatbranorureacomparedtocornsilagezeamaysinsheep
AT dadashiali nutritionalqualityofafreshorangepulpwheatstrawmixtureensiledwitheithersugarbeetpulpwheatbranorureacomparedtocornsilagezeamaysinsheep
AT rouzbehanyousef nutritionalqualityofafreshorangepulpwheatstrawmixtureensiledwitheithersugarbeetpulpwheatbranorureacomparedtocornsilagezeamaysinsheep
AT fazaelihassan nutritionalqualityofafreshorangepulpwheatstrawmixtureensiledwitheithersugarbeetpulpwheatbranorureacomparedtocornsilagezeamaysinsheep
AT rezaeijavad nutritionalqualityofafreshorangepulpwheatstrawmixtureensiledwitheithersugarbeetpulpwheatbranorureacomparedtocornsilagezeamaysinsheep