Cargando…

Endoscopic and Nonendoscopic Approaches to Single-Level Lumbar Spine Decompression: Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Analysis and Frailty-Driven Predictive Model

OBJECTIVE: The endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) approach is associated with high levels of patient satisfaction, shorter recovery time, and reduced complications. The present study reports multicenter, international data, comparing ESS and non-ESS approaches for single-level lumbar decompression, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kassicieh, Alexander J., Rumalla, Kavelin, Segura, Aaron C., Kazim, Syed Faraz, Vellek, John, Schmidt, Meic H., Shin, Peter C., Bowers, Christian A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10080425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37016860
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2346110.055
_version_ 1785020919705501696
author Kassicieh, Alexander J.
Rumalla, Kavelin
Segura, Aaron C.
Kazim, Syed Faraz
Vellek, John
Schmidt, Meic H.
Shin, Peter C.
Bowers, Christian A.
author_facet Kassicieh, Alexander J.
Rumalla, Kavelin
Segura, Aaron C.
Kazim, Syed Faraz
Vellek, John
Schmidt, Meic H.
Shin, Peter C.
Bowers, Christian A.
author_sort Kassicieh, Alexander J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) approach is associated with high levels of patient satisfaction, shorter recovery time, and reduced complications. The present study reports multicenter, international data, comparing ESS and non-ESS approaches for single-level lumbar decompression, and proposes a frailty-driven predictive model for nonhome discharge (NHD) disposition. METHODS: Cases of ESS and non-ESS lumbar spine decompression were queried from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2017–2020). Propensity score matching was performed on baseline characteristics frailty score (measured by risk analysis index [RAI] and modified frailty index-5 [mFI-5]). The primary outcome of interest was NHD disposition. A predictive model was built using logistic regression with RAI as the primary driver. RESULTS: Single-level nonfusion spine lumbar decompression surgery was performed in 38,686 patients. Frailty, as measured by RAI, was a reliable predictor of NHD with excellent discriminatory accuracy in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis: C-statistic: 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65–0.94) in ESS cohort, C-statistic: 0.75 (95% CI, 0.73–0.76) overall cohort. After propensity score matching, there was a reduction in total operative time (89 minutes vs. 103 minutes, p = 0.049) and hospital length of stay (LOS) (0.82 days vs. 1.37 days, p < 0.001) in patients treated endoscopically. In ROC curve analysis, the frailty-driven predictive model performed with excellent diagnostic accuracy for the primary outcome of NHD (C-statistic: 0.87; 95% CI, 0.85–0.88). CONCLUSION: After frailty-based propensity matching, ESS is associated with reduced operative time, shorter hospital LOS, and decreased NHD. The RAI frailty-driven model predicts NHD with excellent diagnostic accuracy and may be applied to preoperative decision-making with a user-friendly calculator: nsgyfrailtyoutcomeslab.shinyapps.io/lumbar_decompression_dischargedispo.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10080425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100804252023-04-08 Endoscopic and Nonendoscopic Approaches to Single-Level Lumbar Spine Decompression: Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Analysis and Frailty-Driven Predictive Model Kassicieh, Alexander J. Rumalla, Kavelin Segura, Aaron C. Kazim, Syed Faraz Vellek, John Schmidt, Meic H. Shin, Peter C. Bowers, Christian A. Neurospine Original Article OBJECTIVE: The endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) approach is associated with high levels of patient satisfaction, shorter recovery time, and reduced complications. The present study reports multicenter, international data, comparing ESS and non-ESS approaches for single-level lumbar decompression, and proposes a frailty-driven predictive model for nonhome discharge (NHD) disposition. METHODS: Cases of ESS and non-ESS lumbar spine decompression were queried from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2017–2020). Propensity score matching was performed on baseline characteristics frailty score (measured by risk analysis index [RAI] and modified frailty index-5 [mFI-5]). The primary outcome of interest was NHD disposition. A predictive model was built using logistic regression with RAI as the primary driver. RESULTS: Single-level nonfusion spine lumbar decompression surgery was performed in 38,686 patients. Frailty, as measured by RAI, was a reliable predictor of NHD with excellent discriminatory accuracy in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis: C-statistic: 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65–0.94) in ESS cohort, C-statistic: 0.75 (95% CI, 0.73–0.76) overall cohort. After propensity score matching, there was a reduction in total operative time (89 minutes vs. 103 minutes, p = 0.049) and hospital length of stay (LOS) (0.82 days vs. 1.37 days, p < 0.001) in patients treated endoscopically. In ROC curve analysis, the frailty-driven predictive model performed with excellent diagnostic accuracy for the primary outcome of NHD (C-statistic: 0.87; 95% CI, 0.85–0.88). CONCLUSION: After frailty-based propensity matching, ESS is associated with reduced operative time, shorter hospital LOS, and decreased NHD. The RAI frailty-driven model predicts NHD with excellent diagnostic accuracy and may be applied to preoperative decision-making with a user-friendly calculator: nsgyfrailtyoutcomeslab.shinyapps.io/lumbar_decompression_dischargedispo. Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2023-03 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10080425/ /pubmed/37016860 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2346110.055 Text en Copyright © 2023 by the Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kassicieh, Alexander J.
Rumalla, Kavelin
Segura, Aaron C.
Kazim, Syed Faraz
Vellek, John
Schmidt, Meic H.
Shin, Peter C.
Bowers, Christian A.
Endoscopic and Nonendoscopic Approaches to Single-Level Lumbar Spine Decompression: Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Analysis and Frailty-Driven Predictive Model
title Endoscopic and Nonendoscopic Approaches to Single-Level Lumbar Spine Decompression: Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Analysis and Frailty-Driven Predictive Model
title_full Endoscopic and Nonendoscopic Approaches to Single-Level Lumbar Spine Decompression: Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Analysis and Frailty-Driven Predictive Model
title_fullStr Endoscopic and Nonendoscopic Approaches to Single-Level Lumbar Spine Decompression: Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Analysis and Frailty-Driven Predictive Model
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic and Nonendoscopic Approaches to Single-Level Lumbar Spine Decompression: Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Analysis and Frailty-Driven Predictive Model
title_short Endoscopic and Nonendoscopic Approaches to Single-Level Lumbar Spine Decompression: Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Analysis and Frailty-Driven Predictive Model
title_sort endoscopic and nonendoscopic approaches to single-level lumbar spine decompression: propensity score-matched comparative analysis and frailty-driven predictive model
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10080425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37016860
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2346110.055
work_keys_str_mv AT kassiciehalexanderj endoscopicandnonendoscopicapproachestosinglelevellumbarspinedecompressionpropensityscorematchedcomparativeanalysisandfrailtydrivenpredictivemodel
AT rumallakavelin endoscopicandnonendoscopicapproachestosinglelevellumbarspinedecompressionpropensityscorematchedcomparativeanalysisandfrailtydrivenpredictivemodel
AT seguraaaronc endoscopicandnonendoscopicapproachestosinglelevellumbarspinedecompressionpropensityscorematchedcomparativeanalysisandfrailtydrivenpredictivemodel
AT kazimsyedfaraz endoscopicandnonendoscopicapproachestosinglelevellumbarspinedecompressionpropensityscorematchedcomparativeanalysisandfrailtydrivenpredictivemodel
AT vellekjohn endoscopicandnonendoscopicapproachestosinglelevellumbarspinedecompressionpropensityscorematchedcomparativeanalysisandfrailtydrivenpredictivemodel
AT schmidtmeich endoscopicandnonendoscopicapproachestosinglelevellumbarspinedecompressionpropensityscorematchedcomparativeanalysisandfrailtydrivenpredictivemodel
AT shinpeterc endoscopicandnonendoscopicapproachestosinglelevellumbarspinedecompressionpropensityscorematchedcomparativeanalysisandfrailtydrivenpredictivemodel
AT bowerschristiana endoscopicandnonendoscopicapproachestosinglelevellumbarspinedecompressionpropensityscorematchedcomparativeanalysisandfrailtydrivenpredictivemodel