Cargando…
Endoscopic and Nonendoscopic Approaches to Single-Level Lumbar Spine Decompression: Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Analysis and Frailty-Driven Predictive Model
OBJECTIVE: The endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) approach is associated with high levels of patient satisfaction, shorter recovery time, and reduced complications. The present study reports multicenter, international data, comparing ESS and non-ESS approaches for single-level lumbar decompression, and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10080425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37016860 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2346110.055 |
_version_ | 1785020919705501696 |
---|---|
author | Kassicieh, Alexander J. Rumalla, Kavelin Segura, Aaron C. Kazim, Syed Faraz Vellek, John Schmidt, Meic H. Shin, Peter C. Bowers, Christian A. |
author_facet | Kassicieh, Alexander J. Rumalla, Kavelin Segura, Aaron C. Kazim, Syed Faraz Vellek, John Schmidt, Meic H. Shin, Peter C. Bowers, Christian A. |
author_sort | Kassicieh, Alexander J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) approach is associated with high levels of patient satisfaction, shorter recovery time, and reduced complications. The present study reports multicenter, international data, comparing ESS and non-ESS approaches for single-level lumbar decompression, and proposes a frailty-driven predictive model for nonhome discharge (NHD) disposition. METHODS: Cases of ESS and non-ESS lumbar spine decompression were queried from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2017–2020). Propensity score matching was performed on baseline characteristics frailty score (measured by risk analysis index [RAI] and modified frailty index-5 [mFI-5]). The primary outcome of interest was NHD disposition. A predictive model was built using logistic regression with RAI as the primary driver. RESULTS: Single-level nonfusion spine lumbar decompression surgery was performed in 38,686 patients. Frailty, as measured by RAI, was a reliable predictor of NHD with excellent discriminatory accuracy in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis: C-statistic: 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65–0.94) in ESS cohort, C-statistic: 0.75 (95% CI, 0.73–0.76) overall cohort. After propensity score matching, there was a reduction in total operative time (89 minutes vs. 103 minutes, p = 0.049) and hospital length of stay (LOS) (0.82 days vs. 1.37 days, p < 0.001) in patients treated endoscopically. In ROC curve analysis, the frailty-driven predictive model performed with excellent diagnostic accuracy for the primary outcome of NHD (C-statistic: 0.87; 95% CI, 0.85–0.88). CONCLUSION: After frailty-based propensity matching, ESS is associated with reduced operative time, shorter hospital LOS, and decreased NHD. The RAI frailty-driven model predicts NHD with excellent diagnostic accuracy and may be applied to preoperative decision-making with a user-friendly calculator: nsgyfrailtyoutcomeslab.shinyapps.io/lumbar_decompression_dischargedispo. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10080425 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100804252023-04-08 Endoscopic and Nonendoscopic Approaches to Single-Level Lumbar Spine Decompression: Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Analysis and Frailty-Driven Predictive Model Kassicieh, Alexander J. Rumalla, Kavelin Segura, Aaron C. Kazim, Syed Faraz Vellek, John Schmidt, Meic H. Shin, Peter C. Bowers, Christian A. Neurospine Original Article OBJECTIVE: The endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) approach is associated with high levels of patient satisfaction, shorter recovery time, and reduced complications. The present study reports multicenter, international data, comparing ESS and non-ESS approaches for single-level lumbar decompression, and proposes a frailty-driven predictive model for nonhome discharge (NHD) disposition. METHODS: Cases of ESS and non-ESS lumbar spine decompression were queried from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2017–2020). Propensity score matching was performed on baseline characteristics frailty score (measured by risk analysis index [RAI] and modified frailty index-5 [mFI-5]). The primary outcome of interest was NHD disposition. A predictive model was built using logistic regression with RAI as the primary driver. RESULTS: Single-level nonfusion spine lumbar decompression surgery was performed in 38,686 patients. Frailty, as measured by RAI, was a reliable predictor of NHD with excellent discriminatory accuracy in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis: C-statistic: 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65–0.94) in ESS cohort, C-statistic: 0.75 (95% CI, 0.73–0.76) overall cohort. After propensity score matching, there was a reduction in total operative time (89 minutes vs. 103 minutes, p = 0.049) and hospital length of stay (LOS) (0.82 days vs. 1.37 days, p < 0.001) in patients treated endoscopically. In ROC curve analysis, the frailty-driven predictive model performed with excellent diagnostic accuracy for the primary outcome of NHD (C-statistic: 0.87; 95% CI, 0.85–0.88). CONCLUSION: After frailty-based propensity matching, ESS is associated with reduced operative time, shorter hospital LOS, and decreased NHD. The RAI frailty-driven model predicts NHD with excellent diagnostic accuracy and may be applied to preoperative decision-making with a user-friendly calculator: nsgyfrailtyoutcomeslab.shinyapps.io/lumbar_decompression_dischargedispo. Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2023-03 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10080425/ /pubmed/37016860 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2346110.055 Text en Copyright © 2023 by the Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kassicieh, Alexander J. Rumalla, Kavelin Segura, Aaron C. Kazim, Syed Faraz Vellek, John Schmidt, Meic H. Shin, Peter C. Bowers, Christian A. Endoscopic and Nonendoscopic Approaches to Single-Level Lumbar Spine Decompression: Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Analysis and Frailty-Driven Predictive Model |
title | Endoscopic and Nonendoscopic Approaches to Single-Level Lumbar Spine Decompression: Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Analysis and Frailty-Driven Predictive Model |
title_full | Endoscopic and Nonendoscopic Approaches to Single-Level Lumbar Spine Decompression: Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Analysis and Frailty-Driven Predictive Model |
title_fullStr | Endoscopic and Nonendoscopic Approaches to Single-Level Lumbar Spine Decompression: Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Analysis and Frailty-Driven Predictive Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic and Nonendoscopic Approaches to Single-Level Lumbar Spine Decompression: Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Analysis and Frailty-Driven Predictive Model |
title_short | Endoscopic and Nonendoscopic Approaches to Single-Level Lumbar Spine Decompression: Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Analysis and Frailty-Driven Predictive Model |
title_sort | endoscopic and nonendoscopic approaches to single-level lumbar spine decompression: propensity score-matched comparative analysis and frailty-driven predictive model |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10080425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37016860 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2346110.055 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kassiciehalexanderj endoscopicandnonendoscopicapproachestosinglelevellumbarspinedecompressionpropensityscorematchedcomparativeanalysisandfrailtydrivenpredictivemodel AT rumallakavelin endoscopicandnonendoscopicapproachestosinglelevellumbarspinedecompressionpropensityscorematchedcomparativeanalysisandfrailtydrivenpredictivemodel AT seguraaaronc endoscopicandnonendoscopicapproachestosinglelevellumbarspinedecompressionpropensityscorematchedcomparativeanalysisandfrailtydrivenpredictivemodel AT kazimsyedfaraz endoscopicandnonendoscopicapproachestosinglelevellumbarspinedecompressionpropensityscorematchedcomparativeanalysisandfrailtydrivenpredictivemodel AT vellekjohn endoscopicandnonendoscopicapproachestosinglelevellumbarspinedecompressionpropensityscorematchedcomparativeanalysisandfrailtydrivenpredictivemodel AT schmidtmeich endoscopicandnonendoscopicapproachestosinglelevellumbarspinedecompressionpropensityscorematchedcomparativeanalysisandfrailtydrivenpredictivemodel AT shinpeterc endoscopicandnonendoscopicapproachestosinglelevellumbarspinedecompressionpropensityscorematchedcomparativeanalysisandfrailtydrivenpredictivemodel AT bowerschristiana endoscopicandnonendoscopicapproachestosinglelevellumbarspinedecompressionpropensityscorematchedcomparativeanalysisandfrailtydrivenpredictivemodel |