Cargando…
Risk factors and prediction model for inpatient surgical site infection after elective abdominal surgery
BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the commonest healthcare-associated infection. In addition to increasing mortality, it also lengthens the hospital stay and raises healthcare expenses. SSIs are challenging to predict, with most models having poor predictability. Therefore, we develope...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10080607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37032800 http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i3.387 |
_version_ | 1785020959772639232 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Jin Xue, Fei Liu, Si-Da Liu, Dong Wu, Yun-Hua Zhao, Dan Liu, Zhou-Ming Ma, Wen-Xing Han, Ruo-Lin Shan, Liang Duan, Xiang-Long |
author_facet | Zhang, Jin Xue, Fei Liu, Si-Da Liu, Dong Wu, Yun-Hua Zhao, Dan Liu, Zhou-Ming Ma, Wen-Xing Han, Ruo-Lin Shan, Liang Duan, Xiang-Long |
author_sort | Zhang, Jin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the commonest healthcare-associated infection. In addition to increasing mortality, it also lengthens the hospital stay and raises healthcare expenses. SSIs are challenging to predict, with most models having poor predictability. Therefore, we developed a prediction model for SSI after elective abdominal surgery by identifying risk factors. AIM: To analyse the data on inpatients undergoing elective abdominal surgery to identify risk factors and develop predictive models that will help clinicians assess patients preoperatively. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the inpatient records of Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital from January 1, 2018 to January 1, 2021. We included the demographic data of the patients and their haematological test results in our analysis. The attending physicians provided the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002) scores. The surgeons and anaesthesiologists manually calculated the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) scores. Inpatient SSI risk factors were evaluated using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression. Nomograms were used in the predictive models. The receiver operating characteristic and area under the curve values were used to measure the specificity and accuracy of the model. RESULTS: A total of 3018 patients met the inclusion criteria. The surgical sites included the uterus (42.2%), the liver (27.6%), the gastrointestinal tract (19.1%), the appendix (5.9%), the kidney (3.7%), and the groin area (1.4%). SSI occurred in 5% of the patients (n = 150). The risk factors associated with SSI were as follows: Age; gender; marital status; place of residence; history of diabetes; surgical season; surgical site; NRS 2002 score; preoperative white blood cell, procalcitonin (PCT), albumin, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) levels; preoperative antibiotic use; anaesthesia method; incision grade; NNIS score; intraoperative blood loss; intraoperative drainage tube placement; surgical operation items. Multivariate logistic regression revealed the following independent risk factors: A history of diabetes [odds ratio (OR) = 5.698, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.305-9.825, P = 0.001], antibiotic use (OR = 14.977, 95%CI: 2.865-78.299, P = 0.001), an NRS 2002 score of ≥ 3 (OR = 2.426, 95%CI: 1.199-4.909, P = 0.014), general anaesthesia (OR = 3.334, 95%CI: 1.134-9.806, P = 0.029), an NNIS score of ≥ 2 (OR = 2.362, 95%CI: 1.019-5.476, P = 0.045), PCT ≥ 0.05 μg/L (OR = 1.687, 95%CI: 1.056-2.695, P = 0.029), LDL < 3.37 mmol/L (OR = 1.719, 95%CI: 1.039-2.842, P = 0.035), intraoperative blood loss ≥ 200 mL (OR = 29.026, 95%CI: 13.751-61.266, P < 0.001), surgical season (P < 0.05), surgical site (P < 0.05), and incision grade I or III (P < 0.05). The overall area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the predictive model was 0.926, which is significantly higher than the NNIS score (0.662). CONCLUSION: The patient’s condition and haematological test indicators form the bases of our prediction model. It is a novel, efficient, and highly accurate predictive model for preventing postoperative SSI, thereby improving the prognosis in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10080607 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100806072023-04-08 Risk factors and prediction model for inpatient surgical site infection after elective abdominal surgery Zhang, Jin Xue, Fei Liu, Si-Da Liu, Dong Wu, Yun-Hua Zhao, Dan Liu, Zhou-Ming Ma, Wen-Xing Han, Ruo-Lin Shan, Liang Duan, Xiang-Long World J Gastrointest Surg Retrospective Study BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the commonest healthcare-associated infection. In addition to increasing mortality, it also lengthens the hospital stay and raises healthcare expenses. SSIs are challenging to predict, with most models having poor predictability. Therefore, we developed a prediction model for SSI after elective abdominal surgery by identifying risk factors. AIM: To analyse the data on inpatients undergoing elective abdominal surgery to identify risk factors and develop predictive models that will help clinicians assess patients preoperatively. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the inpatient records of Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital from January 1, 2018 to January 1, 2021. We included the demographic data of the patients and their haematological test results in our analysis. The attending physicians provided the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002) scores. The surgeons and anaesthesiologists manually calculated the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) scores. Inpatient SSI risk factors were evaluated using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression. Nomograms were used in the predictive models. The receiver operating characteristic and area under the curve values were used to measure the specificity and accuracy of the model. RESULTS: A total of 3018 patients met the inclusion criteria. The surgical sites included the uterus (42.2%), the liver (27.6%), the gastrointestinal tract (19.1%), the appendix (5.9%), the kidney (3.7%), and the groin area (1.4%). SSI occurred in 5% of the patients (n = 150). The risk factors associated with SSI were as follows: Age; gender; marital status; place of residence; history of diabetes; surgical season; surgical site; NRS 2002 score; preoperative white blood cell, procalcitonin (PCT), albumin, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) levels; preoperative antibiotic use; anaesthesia method; incision grade; NNIS score; intraoperative blood loss; intraoperative drainage tube placement; surgical operation items. Multivariate logistic regression revealed the following independent risk factors: A history of diabetes [odds ratio (OR) = 5.698, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.305-9.825, P = 0.001], antibiotic use (OR = 14.977, 95%CI: 2.865-78.299, P = 0.001), an NRS 2002 score of ≥ 3 (OR = 2.426, 95%CI: 1.199-4.909, P = 0.014), general anaesthesia (OR = 3.334, 95%CI: 1.134-9.806, P = 0.029), an NNIS score of ≥ 2 (OR = 2.362, 95%CI: 1.019-5.476, P = 0.045), PCT ≥ 0.05 μg/L (OR = 1.687, 95%CI: 1.056-2.695, P = 0.029), LDL < 3.37 mmol/L (OR = 1.719, 95%CI: 1.039-2.842, P = 0.035), intraoperative blood loss ≥ 200 mL (OR = 29.026, 95%CI: 13.751-61.266, P < 0.001), surgical season (P < 0.05), surgical site (P < 0.05), and incision grade I or III (P < 0.05). The overall area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the predictive model was 0.926, which is significantly higher than the NNIS score (0.662). CONCLUSION: The patient’s condition and haematological test indicators form the bases of our prediction model. It is a novel, efficient, and highly accurate predictive model for preventing postoperative SSI, thereby improving the prognosis in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023-03-27 2023-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10080607/ /pubmed/37032800 http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i3.387 Text en ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Retrospective Study Zhang, Jin Xue, Fei Liu, Si-Da Liu, Dong Wu, Yun-Hua Zhao, Dan Liu, Zhou-Ming Ma, Wen-Xing Han, Ruo-Lin Shan, Liang Duan, Xiang-Long Risk factors and prediction model for inpatient surgical site infection after elective abdominal surgery |
title | Risk factors and prediction model for inpatient surgical site infection after elective abdominal surgery |
title_full | Risk factors and prediction model for inpatient surgical site infection after elective abdominal surgery |
title_fullStr | Risk factors and prediction model for inpatient surgical site infection after elective abdominal surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk factors and prediction model for inpatient surgical site infection after elective abdominal surgery |
title_short | Risk factors and prediction model for inpatient surgical site infection after elective abdominal surgery |
title_sort | risk factors and prediction model for inpatient surgical site infection after elective abdominal surgery |
topic | Retrospective Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10080607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37032800 http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i3.387 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangjin riskfactorsandpredictionmodelforinpatientsurgicalsiteinfectionafterelectiveabdominalsurgery AT xuefei riskfactorsandpredictionmodelforinpatientsurgicalsiteinfectionafterelectiveabdominalsurgery AT liusida riskfactorsandpredictionmodelforinpatientsurgicalsiteinfectionafterelectiveabdominalsurgery AT liudong riskfactorsandpredictionmodelforinpatientsurgicalsiteinfectionafterelectiveabdominalsurgery AT wuyunhua riskfactorsandpredictionmodelforinpatientsurgicalsiteinfectionafterelectiveabdominalsurgery AT zhaodan riskfactorsandpredictionmodelforinpatientsurgicalsiteinfectionafterelectiveabdominalsurgery AT liuzhouming riskfactorsandpredictionmodelforinpatientsurgicalsiteinfectionafterelectiveabdominalsurgery AT mawenxing riskfactorsandpredictionmodelforinpatientsurgicalsiteinfectionafterelectiveabdominalsurgery AT hanruolin riskfactorsandpredictionmodelforinpatientsurgicalsiteinfectionafterelectiveabdominalsurgery AT shanliang riskfactorsandpredictionmodelforinpatientsurgicalsiteinfectionafterelectiveabdominalsurgery AT duanxianglong riskfactorsandpredictionmodelforinpatientsurgicalsiteinfectionafterelectiveabdominalsurgery |