Cargando…

Towards a core-set of mobility measures in ageing research: The need to define mobility and its constructs

BACKGROUND: Mobility is a key determinant and outcome of healthy ageing but its definition, conceptual framework and underlying constructs within the physical domain may need clarification for data comparison and sharing in ageing research. This study aimed to (1) review definitions and conceptual f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reijnierse, Esmee M., Geelen, Sven J.G., van der Schaaf, Marike, Visser, Bart, Wüst, Rob C.I., Pijnappels, Mirjam, Meskers, Carel G. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10080758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37024827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-03859-5
_version_ 1785020981938487296
author Reijnierse, Esmee M.
Geelen, Sven J.G.
van der Schaaf, Marike
Visser, Bart
Wüst, Rob C.I.
Pijnappels, Mirjam
Meskers, Carel G. M.
author_facet Reijnierse, Esmee M.
Geelen, Sven J.G.
van der Schaaf, Marike
Visser, Bart
Wüst, Rob C.I.
Pijnappels, Mirjam
Meskers, Carel G. M.
author_sort Reijnierse, Esmee M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mobility is a key determinant and outcome of healthy ageing but its definition, conceptual framework and underlying constructs within the physical domain may need clarification for data comparison and sharing in ageing research. This study aimed to (1) review definitions and conceptual frameworks of mobility, (2) explore agreement on the definition of mobility, conceptual frameworks, constructs and measures of mobility, and (3) define, classify and identify constructs. METHODS: A three-step approach was adopted: a literature review and two rounds of expert questionnaires (n = 64, n = 31, respectively). Agreement on statements was assessed using a five-point Likert scale; the answer options ‘strongly agree’ or ‘agree’ were combined. The percentage of respondents was subsequently used to classify agreements for each statement as: strong (≥ 80%), moderate (≥ 70% and < 80%) and low (< 70%). RESULTS: A variety of definitions of mobility, conceptual frameworks and constructs were found in the literature and among respondents. Strong agreement was found on defining mobility as the ability to move, including the use of assistive devices. Multiple constructs and measures were identified, but low agreements and variability were found on definitions, classifications and identification of constructs. Strong agreements were found on defining physical capacity (what a person is maximally capable of, ‘can do’) and performance (what a person actually does in their daily life, ‘do’) as key constructs of mobility. CONCLUSION: Agreements on definitions of mobility, physical capacity and performance were found, but constructs of mobility need to be further identified, defined and classified appropriately. Clear terminology and definitions are essential to facilitate communication and interpretation in operationalising the physical domain of mobility as a prerequisite for standardisation of mobility measures. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-023-03859-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10080758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100807582023-04-08 Towards a core-set of mobility measures in ageing research: The need to define mobility and its constructs Reijnierse, Esmee M. Geelen, Sven J.G. van der Schaaf, Marike Visser, Bart Wüst, Rob C.I. Pijnappels, Mirjam Meskers, Carel G. M. BMC Geriatr Research BACKGROUND: Mobility is a key determinant and outcome of healthy ageing but its definition, conceptual framework and underlying constructs within the physical domain may need clarification for data comparison and sharing in ageing research. This study aimed to (1) review definitions and conceptual frameworks of mobility, (2) explore agreement on the definition of mobility, conceptual frameworks, constructs and measures of mobility, and (3) define, classify and identify constructs. METHODS: A three-step approach was adopted: a literature review and two rounds of expert questionnaires (n = 64, n = 31, respectively). Agreement on statements was assessed using a five-point Likert scale; the answer options ‘strongly agree’ or ‘agree’ were combined. The percentage of respondents was subsequently used to classify agreements for each statement as: strong (≥ 80%), moderate (≥ 70% and < 80%) and low (< 70%). RESULTS: A variety of definitions of mobility, conceptual frameworks and constructs were found in the literature and among respondents. Strong agreement was found on defining mobility as the ability to move, including the use of assistive devices. Multiple constructs and measures were identified, but low agreements and variability were found on definitions, classifications and identification of constructs. Strong agreements were found on defining physical capacity (what a person is maximally capable of, ‘can do’) and performance (what a person actually does in their daily life, ‘do’) as key constructs of mobility. CONCLUSION: Agreements on definitions of mobility, physical capacity and performance were found, but constructs of mobility need to be further identified, defined and classified appropriately. Clear terminology and definitions are essential to facilitate communication and interpretation in operationalising the physical domain of mobility as a prerequisite for standardisation of mobility measures. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-023-03859-5. BioMed Central 2023-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10080758/ /pubmed/37024827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-03859-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Reijnierse, Esmee M.
Geelen, Sven J.G.
van der Schaaf, Marike
Visser, Bart
Wüst, Rob C.I.
Pijnappels, Mirjam
Meskers, Carel G. M.
Towards a core-set of mobility measures in ageing research: The need to define mobility and its constructs
title Towards a core-set of mobility measures in ageing research: The need to define mobility and its constructs
title_full Towards a core-set of mobility measures in ageing research: The need to define mobility and its constructs
title_fullStr Towards a core-set of mobility measures in ageing research: The need to define mobility and its constructs
title_full_unstemmed Towards a core-set of mobility measures in ageing research: The need to define mobility and its constructs
title_short Towards a core-set of mobility measures in ageing research: The need to define mobility and its constructs
title_sort towards a core-set of mobility measures in ageing research: the need to define mobility and its constructs
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10080758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37024827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-03859-5
work_keys_str_mv AT reijnierseesmeem towardsacoresetofmobilitymeasuresinageingresearchtheneedtodefinemobilityanditsconstructs
AT geelensvenjg towardsacoresetofmobilitymeasuresinageingresearchtheneedtodefinemobilityanditsconstructs
AT vanderschaafmarike towardsacoresetofmobilitymeasuresinageingresearchtheneedtodefinemobilityanditsconstructs
AT visserbart towardsacoresetofmobilitymeasuresinageingresearchtheneedtodefinemobilityanditsconstructs
AT wustrobci towardsacoresetofmobilitymeasuresinageingresearchtheneedtodefinemobilityanditsconstructs
AT pijnappelsmirjam towardsacoresetofmobilitymeasuresinageingresearchtheneedtodefinemobilityanditsconstructs
AT meskerscarelgm towardsacoresetofmobilitymeasuresinageingresearchtheneedtodefinemobilityanditsconstructs