Cargando…
Towards a core-set of mobility measures in ageing research: The need to define mobility and its constructs
BACKGROUND: Mobility is a key determinant and outcome of healthy ageing but its definition, conceptual framework and underlying constructs within the physical domain may need clarification for data comparison and sharing in ageing research. This study aimed to (1) review definitions and conceptual f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10080758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37024827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-03859-5 |
_version_ | 1785020981938487296 |
---|---|
author | Reijnierse, Esmee M. Geelen, Sven J.G. van der Schaaf, Marike Visser, Bart Wüst, Rob C.I. Pijnappels, Mirjam Meskers, Carel G. M. |
author_facet | Reijnierse, Esmee M. Geelen, Sven J.G. van der Schaaf, Marike Visser, Bart Wüst, Rob C.I. Pijnappels, Mirjam Meskers, Carel G. M. |
author_sort | Reijnierse, Esmee M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mobility is a key determinant and outcome of healthy ageing but its definition, conceptual framework and underlying constructs within the physical domain may need clarification for data comparison and sharing in ageing research. This study aimed to (1) review definitions and conceptual frameworks of mobility, (2) explore agreement on the definition of mobility, conceptual frameworks, constructs and measures of mobility, and (3) define, classify and identify constructs. METHODS: A three-step approach was adopted: a literature review and two rounds of expert questionnaires (n = 64, n = 31, respectively). Agreement on statements was assessed using a five-point Likert scale; the answer options ‘strongly agree’ or ‘agree’ were combined. The percentage of respondents was subsequently used to classify agreements for each statement as: strong (≥ 80%), moderate (≥ 70% and < 80%) and low (< 70%). RESULTS: A variety of definitions of mobility, conceptual frameworks and constructs were found in the literature and among respondents. Strong agreement was found on defining mobility as the ability to move, including the use of assistive devices. Multiple constructs and measures were identified, but low agreements and variability were found on definitions, classifications and identification of constructs. Strong agreements were found on defining physical capacity (what a person is maximally capable of, ‘can do’) and performance (what a person actually does in their daily life, ‘do’) as key constructs of mobility. CONCLUSION: Agreements on definitions of mobility, physical capacity and performance were found, but constructs of mobility need to be further identified, defined and classified appropriately. Clear terminology and definitions are essential to facilitate communication and interpretation in operationalising the physical domain of mobility as a prerequisite for standardisation of mobility measures. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-023-03859-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10080758 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100807582023-04-08 Towards a core-set of mobility measures in ageing research: The need to define mobility and its constructs Reijnierse, Esmee M. Geelen, Sven J.G. van der Schaaf, Marike Visser, Bart Wüst, Rob C.I. Pijnappels, Mirjam Meskers, Carel G. M. BMC Geriatr Research BACKGROUND: Mobility is a key determinant and outcome of healthy ageing but its definition, conceptual framework and underlying constructs within the physical domain may need clarification for data comparison and sharing in ageing research. This study aimed to (1) review definitions and conceptual frameworks of mobility, (2) explore agreement on the definition of mobility, conceptual frameworks, constructs and measures of mobility, and (3) define, classify and identify constructs. METHODS: A three-step approach was adopted: a literature review and two rounds of expert questionnaires (n = 64, n = 31, respectively). Agreement on statements was assessed using a five-point Likert scale; the answer options ‘strongly agree’ or ‘agree’ were combined. The percentage of respondents was subsequently used to classify agreements for each statement as: strong (≥ 80%), moderate (≥ 70% and < 80%) and low (< 70%). RESULTS: A variety of definitions of mobility, conceptual frameworks and constructs were found in the literature and among respondents. Strong agreement was found on defining mobility as the ability to move, including the use of assistive devices. Multiple constructs and measures were identified, but low agreements and variability were found on definitions, classifications and identification of constructs. Strong agreements were found on defining physical capacity (what a person is maximally capable of, ‘can do’) and performance (what a person actually does in their daily life, ‘do’) as key constructs of mobility. CONCLUSION: Agreements on definitions of mobility, physical capacity and performance were found, but constructs of mobility need to be further identified, defined and classified appropriately. Clear terminology and definitions are essential to facilitate communication and interpretation in operationalising the physical domain of mobility as a prerequisite for standardisation of mobility measures. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-023-03859-5. BioMed Central 2023-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10080758/ /pubmed/37024827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-03859-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Reijnierse, Esmee M. Geelen, Sven J.G. van der Schaaf, Marike Visser, Bart Wüst, Rob C.I. Pijnappels, Mirjam Meskers, Carel G. M. Towards a core-set of mobility measures in ageing research: The need to define mobility and its constructs |
title | Towards a core-set of mobility measures in ageing research: The need to define mobility and its constructs |
title_full | Towards a core-set of mobility measures in ageing research: The need to define mobility and its constructs |
title_fullStr | Towards a core-set of mobility measures in ageing research: The need to define mobility and its constructs |
title_full_unstemmed | Towards a core-set of mobility measures in ageing research: The need to define mobility and its constructs |
title_short | Towards a core-set of mobility measures in ageing research: The need to define mobility and its constructs |
title_sort | towards a core-set of mobility measures in ageing research: the need to define mobility and its constructs |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10080758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37024827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-03859-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reijnierseesmeem towardsacoresetofmobilitymeasuresinageingresearchtheneedtodefinemobilityanditsconstructs AT geelensvenjg towardsacoresetofmobilitymeasuresinageingresearchtheneedtodefinemobilityanditsconstructs AT vanderschaafmarike towardsacoresetofmobilitymeasuresinageingresearchtheneedtodefinemobilityanditsconstructs AT visserbart towardsacoresetofmobilitymeasuresinageingresearchtheneedtodefinemobilityanditsconstructs AT wustrobci towardsacoresetofmobilitymeasuresinageingresearchtheneedtodefinemobilityanditsconstructs AT pijnappelsmirjam towardsacoresetofmobilitymeasuresinageingresearchtheneedtodefinemobilityanditsconstructs AT meskerscarelgm towardsacoresetofmobilitymeasuresinageingresearchtheneedtodefinemobilityanditsconstructs |