Cargando…

Wildlife gut microbiomes of sympatric generalist species respond differently to anthropogenic landscape disturbances

BACKGROUND: Human encroachment into nature and the accompanying environmental changes are a big concern for wildlife biodiversity and health. While changes on the macroecological scale, i.e. species community and abundance pattern, are well documented, impacts on the microecological scale, such as t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heni, Alexander Christoph, Fackelmann, Gloria, Eibner, Georg, Kreinert, Swetlana, Schmid, Julian, Schwensow, Nina Isabell, Wiegand, Jonas, Wilhelm, Kerstin, Sommer, Simone
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10080760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37024947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42523-023-00237-9
_version_ 1785020982468018176
author Heni, Alexander Christoph
Fackelmann, Gloria
Eibner, Georg
Kreinert, Swetlana
Schmid, Julian
Schwensow, Nina Isabell
Wiegand, Jonas
Wilhelm, Kerstin
Sommer, Simone
author_facet Heni, Alexander Christoph
Fackelmann, Gloria
Eibner, Georg
Kreinert, Swetlana
Schmid, Julian
Schwensow, Nina Isabell
Wiegand, Jonas
Wilhelm, Kerstin
Sommer, Simone
author_sort Heni, Alexander Christoph
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Human encroachment into nature and the accompanying environmental changes are a big concern for wildlife biodiversity and health. While changes on the macroecological scale, i.e. species community and abundance pattern, are well documented, impacts on the microecological scale, such as the host’s microbial community, remain understudied. Particularly, it is unclear if impacts of anthropogenic landscape modification on wildlife gut microbiomes are species-specific. Of special interest are sympatric, generalist species, assumed to be more resilient to environmental changes and which often are well-known pathogen reservoirs and drivers of spill-over events. Here, we analyzed the gut microbiome of three such sympatric, generalist species, one rodent (Proechimys semispinosus) and two marsupials (Didelphis marsupialis and Philander opossum), captured in 28 study sites in four different landscapes in Panama characterized by different degrees of anthropogenic disturbance. RESULTS: Our results show species-specific gut microbial responses to the same landscape disturbances. The gut microbiome of P. semispinosus was less diverse and more heterogeneous in landscapes with close contact with humans, where it contained bacterial taxa associated with humans, their domesticated animals, and potential pathogens. The gut microbiome of D. marsupialis showed similar patterns, but only in the most disturbed landscape. P. opossum, in contrast, showed little gut microbial changes, however, this species’ absence in the most fragmented landscapes indicates its sensitivity to long-term isolation. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that wildlife gut microbiomes even in generalist species with a large ecological plasticity are impacted by human encroachment into nature, but differ in resilience which can have critical implications on conservation efforts and One Health strategies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42523-023-00237-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10080760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100807602023-04-08 Wildlife gut microbiomes of sympatric generalist species respond differently to anthropogenic landscape disturbances Heni, Alexander Christoph Fackelmann, Gloria Eibner, Georg Kreinert, Swetlana Schmid, Julian Schwensow, Nina Isabell Wiegand, Jonas Wilhelm, Kerstin Sommer, Simone Anim Microbiome Research BACKGROUND: Human encroachment into nature and the accompanying environmental changes are a big concern for wildlife biodiversity and health. While changes on the macroecological scale, i.e. species community and abundance pattern, are well documented, impacts on the microecological scale, such as the host’s microbial community, remain understudied. Particularly, it is unclear if impacts of anthropogenic landscape modification on wildlife gut microbiomes are species-specific. Of special interest are sympatric, generalist species, assumed to be more resilient to environmental changes and which often are well-known pathogen reservoirs and drivers of spill-over events. Here, we analyzed the gut microbiome of three such sympatric, generalist species, one rodent (Proechimys semispinosus) and two marsupials (Didelphis marsupialis and Philander opossum), captured in 28 study sites in four different landscapes in Panama characterized by different degrees of anthropogenic disturbance. RESULTS: Our results show species-specific gut microbial responses to the same landscape disturbances. The gut microbiome of P. semispinosus was less diverse and more heterogeneous in landscapes with close contact with humans, where it contained bacterial taxa associated with humans, their domesticated animals, and potential pathogens. The gut microbiome of D. marsupialis showed similar patterns, but only in the most disturbed landscape. P. opossum, in contrast, showed little gut microbial changes, however, this species’ absence in the most fragmented landscapes indicates its sensitivity to long-term isolation. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that wildlife gut microbiomes even in generalist species with a large ecological plasticity are impacted by human encroachment into nature, but differ in resilience which can have critical implications on conservation efforts and One Health strategies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42523-023-00237-9. BioMed Central 2023-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10080760/ /pubmed/37024947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42523-023-00237-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Heni, Alexander Christoph
Fackelmann, Gloria
Eibner, Georg
Kreinert, Swetlana
Schmid, Julian
Schwensow, Nina Isabell
Wiegand, Jonas
Wilhelm, Kerstin
Sommer, Simone
Wildlife gut microbiomes of sympatric generalist species respond differently to anthropogenic landscape disturbances
title Wildlife gut microbiomes of sympatric generalist species respond differently to anthropogenic landscape disturbances
title_full Wildlife gut microbiomes of sympatric generalist species respond differently to anthropogenic landscape disturbances
title_fullStr Wildlife gut microbiomes of sympatric generalist species respond differently to anthropogenic landscape disturbances
title_full_unstemmed Wildlife gut microbiomes of sympatric generalist species respond differently to anthropogenic landscape disturbances
title_short Wildlife gut microbiomes of sympatric generalist species respond differently to anthropogenic landscape disturbances
title_sort wildlife gut microbiomes of sympatric generalist species respond differently to anthropogenic landscape disturbances
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10080760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37024947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42523-023-00237-9
work_keys_str_mv AT henialexanderchristoph wildlifegutmicrobiomesofsympatricgeneralistspeciesresponddifferentlytoanthropogeniclandscapedisturbances
AT fackelmanngloria wildlifegutmicrobiomesofsympatricgeneralistspeciesresponddifferentlytoanthropogeniclandscapedisturbances
AT eibnergeorg wildlifegutmicrobiomesofsympatricgeneralistspeciesresponddifferentlytoanthropogeniclandscapedisturbances
AT kreinertswetlana wildlifegutmicrobiomesofsympatricgeneralistspeciesresponddifferentlytoanthropogeniclandscapedisturbances
AT schmidjulian wildlifegutmicrobiomesofsympatricgeneralistspeciesresponddifferentlytoanthropogeniclandscapedisturbances
AT schwensowninaisabell wildlifegutmicrobiomesofsympatricgeneralistspeciesresponddifferentlytoanthropogeniclandscapedisturbances
AT wiegandjonas wildlifegutmicrobiomesofsympatricgeneralistspeciesresponddifferentlytoanthropogeniclandscapedisturbances
AT wilhelmkerstin wildlifegutmicrobiomesofsympatricgeneralistspeciesresponddifferentlytoanthropogeniclandscapedisturbances
AT sommersimone wildlifegutmicrobiomesofsympatricgeneralistspeciesresponddifferentlytoanthropogeniclandscapedisturbances