Cargando…
The Intervention Selection Toolbox to improve patient-relevant outcomes: an implementation and qualitative evaluation study in colorectal cancer surgery
BACKGROUND: The concept of value-based healthcare is being used worldwide to improve healthcare. The Intervention Selection Toolbox was developed to bridge the gap of value-based healthcare, between insights in outcomes and actual quality improvement initiatives. In this study we aimed to evaluate t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10080915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37024873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09264-3 |
_version_ | 1785021013756477440 |
---|---|
author | Smalbroek, Bo Vijverberg, Joanna Fahim, Milad Dijksman, Lea Biesma, Douwe Smits, Anke van Merode, Frits van der Nat, Paul |
author_facet | Smalbroek, Bo Vijverberg, Joanna Fahim, Milad Dijksman, Lea Biesma, Douwe Smits, Anke van Merode, Frits van der Nat, Paul |
author_sort | Smalbroek, Bo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The concept of value-based healthcare is being used worldwide to improve healthcare. The Intervention Selection Toolbox was developed to bridge the gap of value-based healthcare, between insights in outcomes and actual quality improvement initiatives. In this study we aimed to evaluate the use of the Intervention Selection Toolbox in daily practice of a quality improvement team in a hospital setting. METHODS: A methodological triangulation design was used. The Intervention Selection Toolbox was used by a multidisciplinary quality improvement team for colorectal cancer care in a large teaching hospital. In-depth semi-structured interviews, focusing on the key elements of process evaluation, were conducted after implementation with representatives of the quality improvement team to evaluate the use of the Intervention Selection Toolbox. Quantitative data regarding improvement initiatives and degree of implementation was also collected. RESULTS: The use of the Intervention Selection Toolbox initially resulted in 80 potential quality improvement initiatives. Eventually, two high potential improvement initiatives were selected. Some components of the toolbox were successfully implemented in daily practice, although ‘standard monitoring’ and ‘causal chain analysis’ proved more difficult to implement. Qualitative analysis was performed with ten members of the multidisciplinary team before thematic saturation occurred. Interviewed members had a wide range in characteristics: age 28–61 years, clinical experience 6–38 years and educational attainment from vocational program to academic doctorate. The Interviews showed added value in the use of the toolbox, but identified time and organizational management as restricting factors. CONCLUSIONS: The Intervention Selection Toolbox is useful to systematically identify improvement initiatives with impact on health outcomes that matter to patients. However, before implementation organizational structure should be optimized to maximize success and efficiency on integration of the Intervention Selection Toolbox. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09264-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10080915 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100809152023-04-08 The Intervention Selection Toolbox to improve patient-relevant outcomes: an implementation and qualitative evaluation study in colorectal cancer surgery Smalbroek, Bo Vijverberg, Joanna Fahim, Milad Dijksman, Lea Biesma, Douwe Smits, Anke van Merode, Frits van der Nat, Paul BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: The concept of value-based healthcare is being used worldwide to improve healthcare. The Intervention Selection Toolbox was developed to bridge the gap of value-based healthcare, between insights in outcomes and actual quality improvement initiatives. In this study we aimed to evaluate the use of the Intervention Selection Toolbox in daily practice of a quality improvement team in a hospital setting. METHODS: A methodological triangulation design was used. The Intervention Selection Toolbox was used by a multidisciplinary quality improvement team for colorectal cancer care in a large teaching hospital. In-depth semi-structured interviews, focusing on the key elements of process evaluation, were conducted after implementation with representatives of the quality improvement team to evaluate the use of the Intervention Selection Toolbox. Quantitative data regarding improvement initiatives and degree of implementation was also collected. RESULTS: The use of the Intervention Selection Toolbox initially resulted in 80 potential quality improvement initiatives. Eventually, two high potential improvement initiatives were selected. Some components of the toolbox were successfully implemented in daily practice, although ‘standard monitoring’ and ‘causal chain analysis’ proved more difficult to implement. Qualitative analysis was performed with ten members of the multidisciplinary team before thematic saturation occurred. Interviewed members had a wide range in characteristics: age 28–61 years, clinical experience 6–38 years and educational attainment from vocational program to academic doctorate. The Interviews showed added value in the use of the toolbox, but identified time and organizational management as restricting factors. CONCLUSIONS: The Intervention Selection Toolbox is useful to systematically identify improvement initiatives with impact on health outcomes that matter to patients. However, before implementation organizational structure should be optimized to maximize success and efficiency on integration of the Intervention Selection Toolbox. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09264-3. BioMed Central 2023-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10080915/ /pubmed/37024873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09264-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Smalbroek, Bo Vijverberg, Joanna Fahim, Milad Dijksman, Lea Biesma, Douwe Smits, Anke van Merode, Frits van der Nat, Paul The Intervention Selection Toolbox to improve patient-relevant outcomes: an implementation and qualitative evaluation study in colorectal cancer surgery |
title | The Intervention Selection Toolbox to improve patient-relevant outcomes: an implementation and qualitative evaluation study in colorectal cancer surgery |
title_full | The Intervention Selection Toolbox to improve patient-relevant outcomes: an implementation and qualitative evaluation study in colorectal cancer surgery |
title_fullStr | The Intervention Selection Toolbox to improve patient-relevant outcomes: an implementation and qualitative evaluation study in colorectal cancer surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | The Intervention Selection Toolbox to improve patient-relevant outcomes: an implementation and qualitative evaluation study in colorectal cancer surgery |
title_short | The Intervention Selection Toolbox to improve patient-relevant outcomes: an implementation and qualitative evaluation study in colorectal cancer surgery |
title_sort | intervention selection toolbox to improve patient-relevant outcomes: an implementation and qualitative evaluation study in colorectal cancer surgery |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10080915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37024873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09264-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smalbroekbo theinterventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery AT vijverbergjoanna theinterventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery AT fahimmilad theinterventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery AT dijksmanlea theinterventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery AT biesmadouwe theinterventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery AT smitsanke theinterventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery AT vanmerodefrits theinterventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery AT vandernatpaul theinterventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery AT smalbroekbo interventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery AT vijverbergjoanna interventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery AT fahimmilad interventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery AT dijksmanlea interventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery AT biesmadouwe interventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery AT smitsanke interventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery AT vanmerodefrits interventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery AT vandernatpaul interventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery |