Cargando…

The Intervention Selection Toolbox to improve patient-relevant outcomes: an implementation and qualitative evaluation study in colorectal cancer surgery

BACKGROUND: The concept of value-based healthcare is being used worldwide to improve healthcare. The Intervention Selection Toolbox was developed to bridge the gap of value-based healthcare, between insights in outcomes and actual quality improvement initiatives. In this study we aimed to evaluate t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smalbroek, Bo, Vijverberg, Joanna, Fahim, Milad, Dijksman, Lea, Biesma, Douwe, Smits, Anke, van Merode, Frits, van der Nat, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10080915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37024873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09264-3
_version_ 1785021013756477440
author Smalbroek, Bo
Vijverberg, Joanna
Fahim, Milad
Dijksman, Lea
Biesma, Douwe
Smits, Anke
van Merode, Frits
van der Nat, Paul
author_facet Smalbroek, Bo
Vijverberg, Joanna
Fahim, Milad
Dijksman, Lea
Biesma, Douwe
Smits, Anke
van Merode, Frits
van der Nat, Paul
author_sort Smalbroek, Bo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The concept of value-based healthcare is being used worldwide to improve healthcare. The Intervention Selection Toolbox was developed to bridge the gap of value-based healthcare, between insights in outcomes and actual quality improvement initiatives. In this study we aimed to evaluate the use of the Intervention Selection Toolbox in daily practice of a quality improvement team in a hospital setting. METHODS: A methodological triangulation design was used. The Intervention Selection Toolbox was used by a multidisciplinary quality improvement team for colorectal cancer care in a large teaching hospital. In-depth semi-structured interviews, focusing on the key elements of process evaluation, were conducted after implementation with representatives of the quality improvement team to evaluate the use of the Intervention Selection Toolbox. Quantitative data regarding improvement initiatives and degree of implementation was also collected. RESULTS: The use of the Intervention Selection Toolbox initially resulted in 80 potential quality improvement initiatives. Eventually, two high potential improvement initiatives were selected. Some components of the toolbox were successfully implemented in daily practice, although ‘standard monitoring’ and ‘causal chain analysis’ proved more difficult to implement. Qualitative analysis was performed with ten members of the multidisciplinary team before thematic saturation occurred. Interviewed members had a wide range in characteristics: age 28–61 years, clinical experience 6–38 years and educational attainment from vocational program to academic doctorate. The Interviews showed added value in the use of the toolbox, but identified time and organizational management as restricting factors. CONCLUSIONS: The Intervention Selection Toolbox is useful to systematically identify improvement initiatives with impact on health outcomes that matter to patients. However, before implementation organizational structure should be optimized to maximize success and efficiency on integration of the Intervention Selection Toolbox. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09264-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10080915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100809152023-04-08 The Intervention Selection Toolbox to improve patient-relevant outcomes: an implementation and qualitative evaluation study in colorectal cancer surgery Smalbroek, Bo Vijverberg, Joanna Fahim, Milad Dijksman, Lea Biesma, Douwe Smits, Anke van Merode, Frits van der Nat, Paul BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: The concept of value-based healthcare is being used worldwide to improve healthcare. The Intervention Selection Toolbox was developed to bridge the gap of value-based healthcare, between insights in outcomes and actual quality improvement initiatives. In this study we aimed to evaluate the use of the Intervention Selection Toolbox in daily practice of a quality improvement team in a hospital setting. METHODS: A methodological triangulation design was used. The Intervention Selection Toolbox was used by a multidisciplinary quality improvement team for colorectal cancer care in a large teaching hospital. In-depth semi-structured interviews, focusing on the key elements of process evaluation, were conducted after implementation with representatives of the quality improvement team to evaluate the use of the Intervention Selection Toolbox. Quantitative data regarding improvement initiatives and degree of implementation was also collected. RESULTS: The use of the Intervention Selection Toolbox initially resulted in 80 potential quality improvement initiatives. Eventually, two high potential improvement initiatives were selected. Some components of the toolbox were successfully implemented in daily practice, although ‘standard monitoring’ and ‘causal chain analysis’ proved more difficult to implement. Qualitative analysis was performed with ten members of the multidisciplinary team before thematic saturation occurred. Interviewed members had a wide range in characteristics: age 28–61 years, clinical experience 6–38 years and educational attainment from vocational program to academic doctorate. The Interviews showed added value in the use of the toolbox, but identified time and organizational management as restricting factors. CONCLUSIONS: The Intervention Selection Toolbox is useful to systematically identify improvement initiatives with impact on health outcomes that matter to patients. However, before implementation organizational structure should be optimized to maximize success and efficiency on integration of the Intervention Selection Toolbox. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09264-3. BioMed Central 2023-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10080915/ /pubmed/37024873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09264-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Smalbroek, Bo
Vijverberg, Joanna
Fahim, Milad
Dijksman, Lea
Biesma, Douwe
Smits, Anke
van Merode, Frits
van der Nat, Paul
The Intervention Selection Toolbox to improve patient-relevant outcomes: an implementation and qualitative evaluation study in colorectal cancer surgery
title The Intervention Selection Toolbox to improve patient-relevant outcomes: an implementation and qualitative evaluation study in colorectal cancer surgery
title_full The Intervention Selection Toolbox to improve patient-relevant outcomes: an implementation and qualitative evaluation study in colorectal cancer surgery
title_fullStr The Intervention Selection Toolbox to improve patient-relevant outcomes: an implementation and qualitative evaluation study in colorectal cancer surgery
title_full_unstemmed The Intervention Selection Toolbox to improve patient-relevant outcomes: an implementation and qualitative evaluation study in colorectal cancer surgery
title_short The Intervention Selection Toolbox to improve patient-relevant outcomes: an implementation and qualitative evaluation study in colorectal cancer surgery
title_sort intervention selection toolbox to improve patient-relevant outcomes: an implementation and qualitative evaluation study in colorectal cancer surgery
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10080915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37024873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09264-3
work_keys_str_mv AT smalbroekbo theinterventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery
AT vijverbergjoanna theinterventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery
AT fahimmilad theinterventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery
AT dijksmanlea theinterventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery
AT biesmadouwe theinterventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery
AT smitsanke theinterventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery
AT vanmerodefrits theinterventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery
AT vandernatpaul theinterventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery
AT smalbroekbo interventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery
AT vijverbergjoanna interventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery
AT fahimmilad interventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery
AT dijksmanlea interventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery
AT biesmadouwe interventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery
AT smitsanke interventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery
AT vanmerodefrits interventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery
AT vandernatpaul interventionselectiontoolboxtoimprovepatientrelevantoutcomesanimplementationandqualitativeevaluationstudyincolorectalcancersurgery