Cargando…

Fluoroscopy-Guided Versus Fluoroscopy-Confirmed Ultrasound-Guided S1 Transforaminal Epidural Injection with Pulsed Radiofrequency: A Prospective, Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective randomized controlled study was to compare the effectiveness and accuracy of the ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided S1 transforaminal epidural injection combined with pulsed radiofrequency in patients with lumbosacral radicular pain caused by S1 nerve involveme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Güven Köse, Selin, Köse, Halil Cihan, Çelikel, Feyza, Akkaya, Ömer Taylan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Atatürk University School of Medicine 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36861865
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2023.22265
_version_ 1785021054754750464
author Güven Köse, Selin
Köse, Halil Cihan
Çelikel, Feyza
Akkaya, Ömer Taylan
author_facet Güven Köse, Selin
Köse, Halil Cihan
Çelikel, Feyza
Akkaya, Ömer Taylan
author_sort Güven Köse, Selin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective randomized controlled study was to compare the effectiveness and accuracy of the ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided S1 transforaminal epidural injection combined with pulsed radiofrequency in patients with lumbosacral radicular pain caused by S1 nerve involvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 patients were randomized into 2 groups. Patients received S1 transforaminal epidural injection combined with pulsed radiofrequency under either ultrasound or fluoroscopy guidance. Primary outcomes were estimated with Visual Analog Scale scores at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included Oswestry Disability Index, Quantitative Analgesic Questionnaire, and patient satisfaction scores during the 6-month follow-up period and procedure-related variables including procedure time and accuracy of the needle replacement. RESULTS: Both techniques provided significant pain reduction and functional improvement for 6 months compared to baseline (P < .001), without statistical significance between groups at each follow-up point. There was no significant difference in pain medication consumption (P = .441) and patient satisfaction scores (P = .673) between groups. The fluoroscopy guidance for combined transforaminal epidural injection with pulsed radiofrequency at S1 provided a greater accuracy for the cannula replacement (100%) than the ultrasound (93.3%), without significant difference between groups (P = .491). CONCLUSION: The ultrasound-guided combined transforaminal epidural injection with pulsed radiofrequency at S1 level is a feasible alternative to fluoroscopy guidance. In this study, we reported that the ultrasound-guided technique resulted in similar treatment benefits including improvement in pain intensity and functionality and reduction in pain medication consumption as those in the fluoroscopy group, while reducing the risk for radiation exposure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10081137
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Atatürk University School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100811372023-04-08 Fluoroscopy-Guided Versus Fluoroscopy-Confirmed Ultrasound-Guided S1 Transforaminal Epidural Injection with Pulsed Radiofrequency: A Prospective, Randomized Trial Güven Köse, Selin Köse, Halil Cihan Çelikel, Feyza Akkaya, Ömer Taylan Eurasian J Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective randomized controlled study was to compare the effectiveness and accuracy of the ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided S1 transforaminal epidural injection combined with pulsed radiofrequency in patients with lumbosacral radicular pain caused by S1 nerve involvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 patients were randomized into 2 groups. Patients received S1 transforaminal epidural injection combined with pulsed radiofrequency under either ultrasound or fluoroscopy guidance. Primary outcomes were estimated with Visual Analog Scale scores at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included Oswestry Disability Index, Quantitative Analgesic Questionnaire, and patient satisfaction scores during the 6-month follow-up period and procedure-related variables including procedure time and accuracy of the needle replacement. RESULTS: Both techniques provided significant pain reduction and functional improvement for 6 months compared to baseline (P < .001), without statistical significance between groups at each follow-up point. There was no significant difference in pain medication consumption (P = .441) and patient satisfaction scores (P = .673) between groups. The fluoroscopy guidance for combined transforaminal epidural injection with pulsed radiofrequency at S1 provided a greater accuracy for the cannula replacement (100%) than the ultrasound (93.3%), without significant difference between groups (P = .491). CONCLUSION: The ultrasound-guided combined transforaminal epidural injection with pulsed radiofrequency at S1 level is a feasible alternative to fluoroscopy guidance. In this study, we reported that the ultrasound-guided technique resulted in similar treatment benefits including improvement in pain intensity and functionality and reduction in pain medication consumption as those in the fluoroscopy group, while reducing the risk for radiation exposure. Atatürk University School of Medicine 2023-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10081137/ /pubmed/36861865 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2023.22265 Text en 2023 authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Güven Köse, Selin
Köse, Halil Cihan
Çelikel, Feyza
Akkaya, Ömer Taylan
Fluoroscopy-Guided Versus Fluoroscopy-Confirmed Ultrasound-Guided S1 Transforaminal Epidural Injection with Pulsed Radiofrequency: A Prospective, Randomized Trial
title Fluoroscopy-Guided Versus Fluoroscopy-Confirmed Ultrasound-Guided S1 Transforaminal Epidural Injection with Pulsed Radiofrequency: A Prospective, Randomized Trial
title_full Fluoroscopy-Guided Versus Fluoroscopy-Confirmed Ultrasound-Guided S1 Transforaminal Epidural Injection with Pulsed Radiofrequency: A Prospective, Randomized Trial
title_fullStr Fluoroscopy-Guided Versus Fluoroscopy-Confirmed Ultrasound-Guided S1 Transforaminal Epidural Injection with Pulsed Radiofrequency: A Prospective, Randomized Trial
title_full_unstemmed Fluoroscopy-Guided Versus Fluoroscopy-Confirmed Ultrasound-Guided S1 Transforaminal Epidural Injection with Pulsed Radiofrequency: A Prospective, Randomized Trial
title_short Fluoroscopy-Guided Versus Fluoroscopy-Confirmed Ultrasound-Guided S1 Transforaminal Epidural Injection with Pulsed Radiofrequency: A Prospective, Randomized Trial
title_sort fluoroscopy-guided versus fluoroscopy-confirmed ultrasound-guided s1 transforaminal epidural injection with pulsed radiofrequency: a prospective, randomized trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36861865
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2023.22265
work_keys_str_mv AT guvenkoseselin fluoroscopyguidedversusfluoroscopyconfirmedultrasoundguideds1transforaminalepiduralinjectionwithpulsedradiofrequencyaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT kosehalilcihan fluoroscopyguidedversusfluoroscopyconfirmedultrasoundguideds1transforaminalepiduralinjectionwithpulsedradiofrequencyaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT celikelfeyza fluoroscopyguidedversusfluoroscopyconfirmedultrasoundguideds1transforaminalepiduralinjectionwithpulsedradiofrequencyaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT akkayaomertaylan fluoroscopyguidedversusfluoroscopyconfirmedultrasoundguideds1transforaminalepiduralinjectionwithpulsedradiofrequencyaprospectiverandomizedtrial