Cargando…
FLASH-RT does not affect chromosome translocations and junction structures beyond that of CONV-RT dose-rates
The molecular and cellular mechanisms driving the enhanced therapeutic ratio of ultra-high dose-rate radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) over slower conventional (CONV-RT) radiotherapy dose-rate remain to be elucidated. However, attenuated DNA damage and transient oxygen depletion are among several proposed mod...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37034651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.27.534408 |
_version_ | 1785021061144772608 |
---|---|
author | Barghouth, Paul G. Melemenidis, Stavros Montay-Gruel, Pierre Ollivier, Jonathan Viswanathan, Vignesh Jorge, Patrik G. Soto, Luis A. Lau, Brianna C. Sadeghi, Cheyenne Edlabadkar, Anushka Manjappa, Rakesh Wang, Jinghui Le Bouteiller, Marie Surucu, Murat Yu, Amy Bush, Karl Skinner, Lawrie Maxim, Peter G. Loo, Billy W. Limoli, Charles L. Vozenin, Marie-Catherine Frock, Richard L. |
author_facet | Barghouth, Paul G. Melemenidis, Stavros Montay-Gruel, Pierre Ollivier, Jonathan Viswanathan, Vignesh Jorge, Patrik G. Soto, Luis A. Lau, Brianna C. Sadeghi, Cheyenne Edlabadkar, Anushka Manjappa, Rakesh Wang, Jinghui Le Bouteiller, Marie Surucu, Murat Yu, Amy Bush, Karl Skinner, Lawrie Maxim, Peter G. Loo, Billy W. Limoli, Charles L. Vozenin, Marie-Catherine Frock, Richard L. |
author_sort | Barghouth, Paul G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The molecular and cellular mechanisms driving the enhanced therapeutic ratio of ultra-high dose-rate radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) over slower conventional (CONV-RT) radiotherapy dose-rate remain to be elucidated. However, attenuated DNA damage and transient oxygen depletion are among several proposed models. Here, we tested whether FLASH-RT under physioxic (4% O(2)) and hypoxic conditions (≤2% O(2)) reduces genome-wide translocations relative to CONV-RT and whether any differences identified revert under normoxic (21% O(2)) conditions. We employed high-throughput rejoin and genome-wide translocation sequencing (HTGTS-JoinT-seq), using S. aureus and S. pyogenes Cas9 “bait” DNA double strand breaks (DSBs), to measure differences in bait-proximal repair and their genome-wide translocations to “prey” DSBs generated by electron beam CONV-RT (0.08–0.13Gy/s) and FLASH-RT (1×10(2)–5×10(6) Gy/s), under varying ionizing radiation (IR) doses and oxygen tensions. Normoxic and physioxic irradiation of HEK293T cells increased translocations at the cost of decreasing bait-proximal repair but were indistinguishable between CONV-RT and FLASH-RT. Although no apparent increase in chromosome translocations was observed with hypoxia-induced apoptosis, the combined decrease in oxygen tension with IR dose-rate modulation did not reveal significant differences in the level of translocations nor in their junction structures. Thus, Irrespective of oxygen tension, FLASH-RT produces translocations and junction structures at levels and proportions that are indistinguishable from CONV-RT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10081175 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100811752023-04-08 FLASH-RT does not affect chromosome translocations and junction structures beyond that of CONV-RT dose-rates Barghouth, Paul G. Melemenidis, Stavros Montay-Gruel, Pierre Ollivier, Jonathan Viswanathan, Vignesh Jorge, Patrik G. Soto, Luis A. Lau, Brianna C. Sadeghi, Cheyenne Edlabadkar, Anushka Manjappa, Rakesh Wang, Jinghui Le Bouteiller, Marie Surucu, Murat Yu, Amy Bush, Karl Skinner, Lawrie Maxim, Peter G. Loo, Billy W. Limoli, Charles L. Vozenin, Marie-Catherine Frock, Richard L. bioRxiv Article The molecular and cellular mechanisms driving the enhanced therapeutic ratio of ultra-high dose-rate radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) over slower conventional (CONV-RT) radiotherapy dose-rate remain to be elucidated. However, attenuated DNA damage and transient oxygen depletion are among several proposed models. Here, we tested whether FLASH-RT under physioxic (4% O(2)) and hypoxic conditions (≤2% O(2)) reduces genome-wide translocations relative to CONV-RT and whether any differences identified revert under normoxic (21% O(2)) conditions. We employed high-throughput rejoin and genome-wide translocation sequencing (HTGTS-JoinT-seq), using S. aureus and S. pyogenes Cas9 “bait” DNA double strand breaks (DSBs), to measure differences in bait-proximal repair and their genome-wide translocations to “prey” DSBs generated by electron beam CONV-RT (0.08–0.13Gy/s) and FLASH-RT (1×10(2)–5×10(6) Gy/s), under varying ionizing radiation (IR) doses and oxygen tensions. Normoxic and physioxic irradiation of HEK293T cells increased translocations at the cost of decreasing bait-proximal repair but were indistinguishable between CONV-RT and FLASH-RT. Although no apparent increase in chromosome translocations was observed with hypoxia-induced apoptosis, the combined decrease in oxygen tension with IR dose-rate modulation did not reveal significant differences in the level of translocations nor in their junction structures. Thus, Irrespective of oxygen tension, FLASH-RT produces translocations and junction structures at levels and proportions that are indistinguishable from CONV-RT. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10081175/ /pubmed/37034651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.27.534408 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. |
spellingShingle | Article Barghouth, Paul G. Melemenidis, Stavros Montay-Gruel, Pierre Ollivier, Jonathan Viswanathan, Vignesh Jorge, Patrik G. Soto, Luis A. Lau, Brianna C. Sadeghi, Cheyenne Edlabadkar, Anushka Manjappa, Rakesh Wang, Jinghui Le Bouteiller, Marie Surucu, Murat Yu, Amy Bush, Karl Skinner, Lawrie Maxim, Peter G. Loo, Billy W. Limoli, Charles L. Vozenin, Marie-Catherine Frock, Richard L. FLASH-RT does not affect chromosome translocations and junction structures beyond that of CONV-RT dose-rates |
title | FLASH-RT does not affect chromosome translocations and junction structures beyond that of CONV-RT dose-rates |
title_full | FLASH-RT does not affect chromosome translocations and junction structures beyond that of CONV-RT dose-rates |
title_fullStr | FLASH-RT does not affect chromosome translocations and junction structures beyond that of CONV-RT dose-rates |
title_full_unstemmed | FLASH-RT does not affect chromosome translocations and junction structures beyond that of CONV-RT dose-rates |
title_short | FLASH-RT does not affect chromosome translocations and junction structures beyond that of CONV-RT dose-rates |
title_sort | flash-rt does not affect chromosome translocations and junction structures beyond that of conv-rt dose-rates |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37034651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.27.534408 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barghouthpaulg flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates AT melemenidisstavros flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates AT montaygruelpierre flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates AT ollivierjonathan flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates AT viswanathanvignesh flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates AT jorgepatrikg flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates AT sotoluisa flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates AT laubriannac flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates AT sadeghicheyenne flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates AT edlabadkaranushka flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates AT manjapparakesh flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates AT wangjinghui flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates AT lebouteillermarie flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates AT surucumurat flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates AT yuamy flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates AT bushkarl flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates AT skinnerlawrie flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates AT maximpeterg flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates AT loobillyw flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates AT limolicharlesl flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates AT vozeninmariecatherine flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates AT frockrichardl flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates |