Cargando…

FLASH-RT does not affect chromosome translocations and junction structures beyond that of CONV-RT dose-rates

The molecular and cellular mechanisms driving the enhanced therapeutic ratio of ultra-high dose-rate radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) over slower conventional (CONV-RT) radiotherapy dose-rate remain to be elucidated. However, attenuated DNA damage and transient oxygen depletion are among several proposed mod...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barghouth, Paul G., Melemenidis, Stavros, Montay-Gruel, Pierre, Ollivier, Jonathan, Viswanathan, Vignesh, Jorge, Patrik G., Soto, Luis A., Lau, Brianna C., Sadeghi, Cheyenne, Edlabadkar, Anushka, Manjappa, Rakesh, Wang, Jinghui, Le Bouteiller, Marie, Surucu, Murat, Yu, Amy, Bush, Karl, Skinner, Lawrie, Maxim, Peter G., Loo, Billy W., Limoli, Charles L., Vozenin, Marie-Catherine, Frock, Richard L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37034651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.27.534408
_version_ 1785021061144772608
author Barghouth, Paul G.
Melemenidis, Stavros
Montay-Gruel, Pierre
Ollivier, Jonathan
Viswanathan, Vignesh
Jorge, Patrik G.
Soto, Luis A.
Lau, Brianna C.
Sadeghi, Cheyenne
Edlabadkar, Anushka
Manjappa, Rakesh
Wang, Jinghui
Le Bouteiller, Marie
Surucu, Murat
Yu, Amy
Bush, Karl
Skinner, Lawrie
Maxim, Peter G.
Loo, Billy W.
Limoli, Charles L.
Vozenin, Marie-Catherine
Frock, Richard L.
author_facet Barghouth, Paul G.
Melemenidis, Stavros
Montay-Gruel, Pierre
Ollivier, Jonathan
Viswanathan, Vignesh
Jorge, Patrik G.
Soto, Luis A.
Lau, Brianna C.
Sadeghi, Cheyenne
Edlabadkar, Anushka
Manjappa, Rakesh
Wang, Jinghui
Le Bouteiller, Marie
Surucu, Murat
Yu, Amy
Bush, Karl
Skinner, Lawrie
Maxim, Peter G.
Loo, Billy W.
Limoli, Charles L.
Vozenin, Marie-Catherine
Frock, Richard L.
author_sort Barghouth, Paul G.
collection PubMed
description The molecular and cellular mechanisms driving the enhanced therapeutic ratio of ultra-high dose-rate radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) over slower conventional (CONV-RT) radiotherapy dose-rate remain to be elucidated. However, attenuated DNA damage and transient oxygen depletion are among several proposed models. Here, we tested whether FLASH-RT under physioxic (4% O(2)) and hypoxic conditions (≤2% O(2)) reduces genome-wide translocations relative to CONV-RT and whether any differences identified revert under normoxic (21% O(2)) conditions. We employed high-throughput rejoin and genome-wide translocation sequencing (HTGTS-JoinT-seq), using S. aureus and S. pyogenes Cas9 “bait” DNA double strand breaks (DSBs), to measure differences in bait-proximal repair and their genome-wide translocations to “prey” DSBs generated by electron beam CONV-RT (0.08–0.13Gy/s) and FLASH-RT (1×10(2)–5×10(6) Gy/s), under varying ionizing radiation (IR) doses and oxygen tensions. Normoxic and physioxic irradiation of HEK293T cells increased translocations at the cost of decreasing bait-proximal repair but were indistinguishable between CONV-RT and FLASH-RT. Although no apparent increase in chromosome translocations was observed with hypoxia-induced apoptosis, the combined decrease in oxygen tension with IR dose-rate modulation did not reveal significant differences in the level of translocations nor in their junction structures. Thus, Irrespective of oxygen tension, FLASH-RT produces translocations and junction structures at levels and proportions that are indistinguishable from CONV-RT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10081175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100811752023-04-08 FLASH-RT does not affect chromosome translocations and junction structures beyond that of CONV-RT dose-rates Barghouth, Paul G. Melemenidis, Stavros Montay-Gruel, Pierre Ollivier, Jonathan Viswanathan, Vignesh Jorge, Patrik G. Soto, Luis A. Lau, Brianna C. Sadeghi, Cheyenne Edlabadkar, Anushka Manjappa, Rakesh Wang, Jinghui Le Bouteiller, Marie Surucu, Murat Yu, Amy Bush, Karl Skinner, Lawrie Maxim, Peter G. Loo, Billy W. Limoli, Charles L. Vozenin, Marie-Catherine Frock, Richard L. bioRxiv Article The molecular and cellular mechanisms driving the enhanced therapeutic ratio of ultra-high dose-rate radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) over slower conventional (CONV-RT) radiotherapy dose-rate remain to be elucidated. However, attenuated DNA damage and transient oxygen depletion are among several proposed models. Here, we tested whether FLASH-RT under physioxic (4% O(2)) and hypoxic conditions (≤2% O(2)) reduces genome-wide translocations relative to CONV-RT and whether any differences identified revert under normoxic (21% O(2)) conditions. We employed high-throughput rejoin and genome-wide translocation sequencing (HTGTS-JoinT-seq), using S. aureus and S. pyogenes Cas9 “bait” DNA double strand breaks (DSBs), to measure differences in bait-proximal repair and their genome-wide translocations to “prey” DSBs generated by electron beam CONV-RT (0.08–0.13Gy/s) and FLASH-RT (1×10(2)–5×10(6) Gy/s), under varying ionizing radiation (IR) doses and oxygen tensions. Normoxic and physioxic irradiation of HEK293T cells increased translocations at the cost of decreasing bait-proximal repair but were indistinguishable between CONV-RT and FLASH-RT. Although no apparent increase in chromosome translocations was observed with hypoxia-induced apoptosis, the combined decrease in oxygen tension with IR dose-rate modulation did not reveal significant differences in the level of translocations nor in their junction structures. Thus, Irrespective of oxygen tension, FLASH-RT produces translocations and junction structures at levels and proportions that are indistinguishable from CONV-RT. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10081175/ /pubmed/37034651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.27.534408 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
spellingShingle Article
Barghouth, Paul G.
Melemenidis, Stavros
Montay-Gruel, Pierre
Ollivier, Jonathan
Viswanathan, Vignesh
Jorge, Patrik G.
Soto, Luis A.
Lau, Brianna C.
Sadeghi, Cheyenne
Edlabadkar, Anushka
Manjappa, Rakesh
Wang, Jinghui
Le Bouteiller, Marie
Surucu, Murat
Yu, Amy
Bush, Karl
Skinner, Lawrie
Maxim, Peter G.
Loo, Billy W.
Limoli, Charles L.
Vozenin, Marie-Catherine
Frock, Richard L.
FLASH-RT does not affect chromosome translocations and junction structures beyond that of CONV-RT dose-rates
title FLASH-RT does not affect chromosome translocations and junction structures beyond that of CONV-RT dose-rates
title_full FLASH-RT does not affect chromosome translocations and junction structures beyond that of CONV-RT dose-rates
title_fullStr FLASH-RT does not affect chromosome translocations and junction structures beyond that of CONV-RT dose-rates
title_full_unstemmed FLASH-RT does not affect chromosome translocations and junction structures beyond that of CONV-RT dose-rates
title_short FLASH-RT does not affect chromosome translocations and junction structures beyond that of CONV-RT dose-rates
title_sort flash-rt does not affect chromosome translocations and junction structures beyond that of conv-rt dose-rates
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37034651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.27.534408
work_keys_str_mv AT barghouthpaulg flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates
AT melemenidisstavros flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates
AT montaygruelpierre flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates
AT ollivierjonathan flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates
AT viswanathanvignesh flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates
AT jorgepatrikg flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates
AT sotoluisa flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates
AT laubriannac flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates
AT sadeghicheyenne flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates
AT edlabadkaranushka flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates
AT manjapparakesh flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates
AT wangjinghui flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates
AT lebouteillermarie flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates
AT surucumurat flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates
AT yuamy flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates
AT bushkarl flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates
AT skinnerlawrie flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates
AT maximpeterg flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates
AT loobillyw flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates
AT limolicharlesl flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates
AT vozeninmariecatherine flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates
AT frockrichardl flashrtdoesnotaffectchromosometranslocationsandjunctionstructuresbeyondthatofconvrtdoserates