Cargando…

Assessment tools for elder abuse: scoping review

OBJECTIVE: to map assessment tools for elder abuse and determine the psychometric properties of each one. METHOD: scoping review developed according to recommendations of the JBI Institute Reviewer’s Manual in databases and gray literature. RESULTS: seventeen tools were identified for measuring situ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: dos Santos-Rodrigues, Renata Clemente, Brandão, Bárbara Maria Lopes da Silva, de Araújo-Monteiro, Gleicy Karine Nascimento, Marcolino, Emanuella de Castro, de Moraes, Ronei Marcos, Souto, Rafaella Queiroga
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36490228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0115en
_version_ 1785021154341158912
author dos Santos-Rodrigues, Renata Clemente
Brandão, Bárbara Maria Lopes da Silva
de Araújo-Monteiro, Gleicy Karine Nascimento
Marcolino, Emanuella de Castro
de Moraes, Ronei Marcos
Souto, Rafaella Queiroga
author_facet dos Santos-Rodrigues, Renata Clemente
Brandão, Bárbara Maria Lopes da Silva
de Araújo-Monteiro, Gleicy Karine Nascimento
Marcolino, Emanuella de Castro
de Moraes, Ronei Marcos
Souto, Rafaella Queiroga
author_sort dos Santos-Rodrigues, Renata Clemente
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: to map assessment tools for elder abuse and determine the psychometric properties of each one. METHOD: scoping review developed according to recommendations of the JBI Institute Reviewer’s Manual in databases and gray literature. RESULTS: seventeen tools were identified for measuring situations of elder abuse. They were categorized into 1) Tools for assessment of risk for abuse, and 2) Tools for identification of abuse. According to risk for abuse, Vulnerability to Abuse Screening Scale was the most prevalent in the literature, with factorial analysis acceptable through four domains, and good internal reliability (0,74). Therefore, Assessment Tool for Domestic Elder Abuse comprises the assessment of six types of elder abuse; however, the study shows psychometric limitation since the internal structure was not evaluated by validity evidences. CONCLUSION: seventeen tools to determine the occurrence or risk for elder abuse were identified with different psychometric properties. We recommend the use of more than one of the tools identified for an appropriate measurement of elder abuse situations given the complexity of the phenomenon and the lack of a single instrument that contemplates all its consequences and forms of expression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10081593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100815932023-04-14 Assessment tools for elder abuse: scoping review dos Santos-Rodrigues, Renata Clemente Brandão, Bárbara Maria Lopes da Silva de Araújo-Monteiro, Gleicy Karine Nascimento Marcolino, Emanuella de Castro de Moraes, Ronei Marcos Souto, Rafaella Queiroga Rev Esc Enferm USP Review OBJECTIVE: to map assessment tools for elder abuse and determine the psychometric properties of each one. METHOD: scoping review developed according to recommendations of the JBI Institute Reviewer’s Manual in databases and gray literature. RESULTS: seventeen tools were identified for measuring situations of elder abuse. They were categorized into 1) Tools for assessment of risk for abuse, and 2) Tools for identification of abuse. According to risk for abuse, Vulnerability to Abuse Screening Scale was the most prevalent in the literature, with factorial analysis acceptable through four domains, and good internal reliability (0,74). Therefore, Assessment Tool for Domestic Elder Abuse comprises the assessment of six types of elder abuse; however, the study shows psychometric limitation since the internal structure was not evaluated by validity evidences. CONCLUSION: seventeen tools to determine the occurrence or risk for elder abuse were identified with different psychometric properties. We recommend the use of more than one of the tools identified for an appropriate measurement of elder abuse situations given the complexity of the phenomenon and the lack of a single instrument that contemplates all its consequences and forms of expression. Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10081593/ /pubmed/36490228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0115en Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
dos Santos-Rodrigues, Renata Clemente
Brandão, Bárbara Maria Lopes da Silva
de Araújo-Monteiro, Gleicy Karine Nascimento
Marcolino, Emanuella de Castro
de Moraes, Ronei Marcos
Souto, Rafaella Queiroga
Assessment tools for elder abuse: scoping review
title Assessment tools for elder abuse: scoping review
title_full Assessment tools for elder abuse: scoping review
title_fullStr Assessment tools for elder abuse: scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Assessment tools for elder abuse: scoping review
title_short Assessment tools for elder abuse: scoping review
title_sort assessment tools for elder abuse: scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36490228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0115en
work_keys_str_mv AT dossantosrodriguesrenataclemente assessmenttoolsforelderabusescopingreview
AT brandaobarbaramarialopesdasilva assessmenttoolsforelderabusescopingreview
AT dearaujomonteirogleicykarinenascimento assessmenttoolsforelderabusescopingreview
AT marcolinoemanuelladecastro assessmenttoolsforelderabusescopingreview
AT demoraesroneimarcos assessmenttoolsforelderabusescopingreview
AT soutorafaellaqueiroga assessmenttoolsforelderabusescopingreview