Cargando…
Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development” (*)
OBJECTIVE: To validate clinically the risk factors of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development”. METHOD: Cross-sectional quantitative study carried out in a specialty outpatient clinic and in family health units with 124 children. The data was collected through interviews with the c...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081643/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36541418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0229en |
_version_ | 1785021165699334144 |
---|---|
author | de Melo, Nádia Proença de Souza, Juliana Martins Cordeiro, Samara Macedo Veríssimo, Maria de La Ó Ramallo |
author_facet | de Melo, Nádia Proença de Souza, Juliana Martins Cordeiro, Samara Macedo Veríssimo, Maria de La Ó Ramallo |
author_sort | de Melo, Nádia Proença |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To validate clinically the risk factors of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development”. METHOD: Cross-sectional quantitative study carried out in a specialty outpatient clinic and in family health units with 124 children. The data was collected through interviews with the children’s guardians to investigate the risk factors for delay in child development. RESULTS: The tested risk factors affected 108 of the evaluated children (87.1%). In the accuracy tests, most specificity values were above 80% and sensitivity values were lower than 30%. Most risk factors had odds ratio >1, three of which were noteworthy: genetic disorder (OR = 38, p < 0.05) and congenital disorder (OR = 4.4, p < 0.05), among child-related aspects, and impaired cognitive development in parents (OR = 27, p < 0.05), among caregiver-related aspects. CONCLUSION: The study contributed to a refined diagnostic accuracy, identifying potential associated factors of the evaluated diagnosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10081643 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100816432023-04-14 Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development” (*) de Melo, Nádia Proença de Souza, Juliana Martins Cordeiro, Samara Macedo Veríssimo, Maria de La Ó Ramallo Rev Esc Enferm USP Original Article OBJECTIVE: To validate clinically the risk factors of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development”. METHOD: Cross-sectional quantitative study carried out in a specialty outpatient clinic and in family health units with 124 children. The data was collected through interviews with the children’s guardians to investigate the risk factors for delay in child development. RESULTS: The tested risk factors affected 108 of the evaluated children (87.1%). In the accuracy tests, most specificity values were above 80% and sensitivity values were lower than 30%. Most risk factors had odds ratio >1, three of which were noteworthy: genetic disorder (OR = 38, p < 0.05) and congenital disorder (OR = 4.4, p < 0.05), among child-related aspects, and impaired cognitive development in parents (OR = 27, p < 0.05), among caregiver-related aspects. CONCLUSION: The study contributed to a refined diagnostic accuracy, identifying potential associated factors of the evaluated diagnosis. Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem 2022-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10081643/ /pubmed/36541418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0229en Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article de Melo, Nádia Proença de Souza, Juliana Martins Cordeiro, Samara Macedo Veríssimo, Maria de La Ó Ramallo Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development” (*) |
title | Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development”
(*)
|
title_full | Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development”
(*)
|
title_fullStr | Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development”
(*)
|
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development”
(*)
|
title_short | Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development”
(*)
|
title_sort | clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “risk for delayed child development”
(*) |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081643/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36541418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0229en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demelonadiaproenca clinicalvalidationofthenursingdiagnosisriskfordelayedchilddevelopment AT desouzajulianamartins clinicalvalidationofthenursingdiagnosisriskfordelayedchilddevelopment AT cordeirosamaramacedo clinicalvalidationofthenursingdiagnosisriskfordelayedchilddevelopment AT verissimomariadelaoramallo clinicalvalidationofthenursingdiagnosisriskfordelayedchilddevelopment |