Cargando…

Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development” (*)

OBJECTIVE: To validate clinically the risk factors of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development”. METHOD: Cross-sectional quantitative study carried out in a specialty outpatient clinic and in family health units with 124 children. The data was collected through interviews with the c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Melo, Nádia Proença, de Souza, Juliana Martins, Cordeiro, Samara Macedo, Veríssimo, Maria de La Ó Ramallo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36541418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0229en
_version_ 1785021165699334144
author de Melo, Nádia Proença
de Souza, Juliana Martins
Cordeiro, Samara Macedo
Veríssimo, Maria de La Ó Ramallo
author_facet de Melo, Nádia Proença
de Souza, Juliana Martins
Cordeiro, Samara Macedo
Veríssimo, Maria de La Ó Ramallo
author_sort de Melo, Nádia Proença
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To validate clinically the risk factors of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development”. METHOD: Cross-sectional quantitative study carried out in a specialty outpatient clinic and in family health units with 124 children. The data was collected through interviews with the children’s guardians to investigate the risk factors for delay in child development. RESULTS: The tested risk factors affected 108 of the evaluated children (87.1%). In the accuracy tests, most specificity values were above 80% and sensitivity values were lower than 30%. Most risk factors had odds ratio >1, three of which were noteworthy: genetic disorder (OR = 38, p < 0.05) and congenital disorder (OR = 4.4, p < 0.05), among child-related aspects, and impaired cognitive development in parents (OR = 27, p < 0.05), among caregiver-related aspects. CONCLUSION: The study contributed to a refined diagnostic accuracy, identifying potential associated factors of the evaluated diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10081643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100816432023-04-14 Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development” (*) de Melo, Nádia Proença de Souza, Juliana Martins Cordeiro, Samara Macedo Veríssimo, Maria de La Ó Ramallo Rev Esc Enferm USP Original Article OBJECTIVE: To validate clinically the risk factors of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development”. METHOD: Cross-sectional quantitative study carried out in a specialty outpatient clinic and in family health units with 124 children. The data was collected through interviews with the children’s guardians to investigate the risk factors for delay in child development. RESULTS: The tested risk factors affected 108 of the evaluated children (87.1%). In the accuracy tests, most specificity values were above 80% and sensitivity values were lower than 30%. Most risk factors had odds ratio >1, three of which were noteworthy: genetic disorder (OR = 38, p < 0.05) and congenital disorder (OR = 4.4, p < 0.05), among child-related aspects, and impaired cognitive development in parents (OR = 27, p < 0.05), among caregiver-related aspects. CONCLUSION: The study contributed to a refined diagnostic accuracy, identifying potential associated factors of the evaluated diagnosis. Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem 2022-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10081643/ /pubmed/36541418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0229en Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
de Melo, Nádia Proença
de Souza, Juliana Martins
Cordeiro, Samara Macedo
Veríssimo, Maria de La Ó Ramallo
Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development” (*)
title Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development” (*)
title_full Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development” (*)
title_fullStr Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development” (*)
title_full_unstemmed Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development” (*)
title_short Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development” (*)
title_sort clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “risk for delayed child development” (*)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36541418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0229en
work_keys_str_mv AT demelonadiaproenca clinicalvalidationofthenursingdiagnosisriskfordelayedchilddevelopment
AT desouzajulianamartins clinicalvalidationofthenursingdiagnosisriskfordelayedchilddevelopment
AT cordeirosamaramacedo clinicalvalidationofthenursingdiagnosisriskfordelayedchilddevelopment
AT verissimomariadelaoramallo clinicalvalidationofthenursingdiagnosisriskfordelayedchilddevelopment