Cargando…
Implementation of eMental health technologies for informal caregivers: A multiple case study
INTRODUCTION: Informal caregivers offer continuous unpaid support to loved ones who are unable to live independently. Providing care can be a very burdensome commitment, that heavily impacts informal caregivers’ mental health. eMental health is a possible, yet challenging, solution to improve caregi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081674/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035479 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2023.1130866 |
_version_ | 1785021172900954112 |
---|---|
author | Bastoni, Sofia van Gemert-Pijnen, Lisette Sanderman, Robbert van Dongen, Anne |
author_facet | Bastoni, Sofia van Gemert-Pijnen, Lisette Sanderman, Robbert van Dongen, Anne |
author_sort | Bastoni, Sofia |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Informal caregivers offer continuous unpaid support to loved ones who are unable to live independently. Providing care can be a very burdensome commitment, that heavily impacts informal caregivers’ mental health. eMental health is a possible, yet challenging, solution to improve caregivers’ mental health and their overall experience of caregiving. In fact, eMental health technologies often face challenges of implementation. The present work gathers knowledge on how to best deal with these challenges by collecting testimonies of implementation experts of eight eMental health technologies for informal caregivers with the aim of comparing them and extracting lessons learned. METHODS: For this multiple case study, technologies were selected (through informal suggestions and independent search) according to the following inclusion criteria: they were intended for informal caregivers as main user group, were aimed at improving informal caregivers’ mental wellbeing and caregiving experience and were available and running in real life settings in Europe. Ten interviews were conducted (two pilots and eight included cases). The interviewees were asked to provide a description of the technology and its aims and their implementation approach, method and frameworks used. Finally, determinants of implementation, the influence of the Covid-19 pandemic on implementation processes and lessons learned were investigated. RESULTS: The results highlight key differences between technologies developed within academia and the industry regarding efficacy testing and use and use and choice of frameworks. Also, similarities in terms of recognized barriers such as financing are illustrated. DISCUSSION: Possible ways to overcome main barriers and examples of best practices, such as structuring a business model and discussing tool maintenance and long-term hosting in advance, are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10081674 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100816742023-04-08 Implementation of eMental health technologies for informal caregivers: A multiple case study Bastoni, Sofia van Gemert-Pijnen, Lisette Sanderman, Robbert van Dongen, Anne Front Digit Health Digital Health INTRODUCTION: Informal caregivers offer continuous unpaid support to loved ones who are unable to live independently. Providing care can be a very burdensome commitment, that heavily impacts informal caregivers’ mental health. eMental health is a possible, yet challenging, solution to improve caregivers’ mental health and their overall experience of caregiving. In fact, eMental health technologies often face challenges of implementation. The present work gathers knowledge on how to best deal with these challenges by collecting testimonies of implementation experts of eight eMental health technologies for informal caregivers with the aim of comparing them and extracting lessons learned. METHODS: For this multiple case study, technologies were selected (through informal suggestions and independent search) according to the following inclusion criteria: they were intended for informal caregivers as main user group, were aimed at improving informal caregivers’ mental wellbeing and caregiving experience and were available and running in real life settings in Europe. Ten interviews were conducted (two pilots and eight included cases). The interviewees were asked to provide a description of the technology and its aims and their implementation approach, method and frameworks used. Finally, determinants of implementation, the influence of the Covid-19 pandemic on implementation processes and lessons learned were investigated. RESULTS: The results highlight key differences between technologies developed within academia and the industry regarding efficacy testing and use and use and choice of frameworks. Also, similarities in terms of recognized barriers such as financing are illustrated. DISCUSSION: Possible ways to overcome main barriers and examples of best practices, such as structuring a business model and discussing tool maintenance and long-term hosting in advance, are discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10081674/ /pubmed/37035479 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2023.1130866 Text en © 2023 Bastoni, van Gemert-Pijnen, Sanderman and van Dongen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Digital Health Bastoni, Sofia van Gemert-Pijnen, Lisette Sanderman, Robbert van Dongen, Anne Implementation of eMental health technologies for informal caregivers: A multiple case study |
title | Implementation of eMental health technologies for informal caregivers: A multiple case study |
title_full | Implementation of eMental health technologies for informal caregivers: A multiple case study |
title_fullStr | Implementation of eMental health technologies for informal caregivers: A multiple case study |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of eMental health technologies for informal caregivers: A multiple case study |
title_short | Implementation of eMental health technologies for informal caregivers: A multiple case study |
title_sort | implementation of emental health technologies for informal caregivers: a multiple case study |
topic | Digital Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081674/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035479 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2023.1130866 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bastonisofia implementationofementalhealthtechnologiesforinformalcaregiversamultiplecasestudy AT vangemertpijnenlisette implementationofementalhealthtechnologiesforinformalcaregiversamultiplecasestudy AT sandermanrobbert implementationofementalhealthtechnologiesforinformalcaregiversamultiplecasestudy AT vandongenanne implementationofementalhealthtechnologiesforinformalcaregiversamultiplecasestudy |