Cargando…

Prioritisation of Informed Health Choices (IHC) key concepts to be included in lower secondary school resources: A consensus study

BACKGROUND: The Informed Health Choices Key Concepts are principles for thinking critically about healthcare claims and deciding what to do. The Key Concepts provide a framework for designing curricula, learning resources, and evaluation tools. OBJECTIVES: To prioritise which of the 49 Key Concepts...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agaba, Joseph Jude, Chesire, Faith, Mugisha, Michael, Nandi, Pamela, Njue, Jane, Nsangi, Allen, Nsengimana, Venuste, Oyuga, Cyril, Rutiyomba, Florian, Semakula, Daniel, Ssenyonga, Ronald, Uwimana, Innocent, Oxman, Andrew David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37027357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267422
_version_ 1785021177328041984
author Agaba, Joseph Jude
Chesire, Faith
Mugisha, Michael
Nandi, Pamela
Njue, Jane
Nsangi, Allen
Nsengimana, Venuste
Oyuga, Cyril
Rutiyomba, Florian
Semakula, Daniel
Ssenyonga, Ronald
Uwimana, Innocent
Oxman, Andrew David
author_facet Agaba, Joseph Jude
Chesire, Faith
Mugisha, Michael
Nandi, Pamela
Njue, Jane
Nsangi, Allen
Nsengimana, Venuste
Oyuga, Cyril
Rutiyomba, Florian
Semakula, Daniel
Ssenyonga, Ronald
Uwimana, Innocent
Oxman, Andrew David
author_sort Agaba, Joseph Jude
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Informed Health Choices Key Concepts are principles for thinking critically about healthcare claims and deciding what to do. The Key Concepts provide a framework for designing curricula, learning resources, and evaluation tools. OBJECTIVES: To prioritise which of the 49 Key Concepts to include in resources for lower secondary schools in East Africa. METHODS: Twelve judges used an iterative process to reach a consensus. The judges were curriculum specialists, teachers, and researchers from Kenya, Uganda, and Rwanda. After familiarising themselves with the concepts, they pilot-tested draft criteria for selecting and ordering the concepts. After agreeing on the criteria, nine judges independently assessed all 49 concepts and reached an initial consensus. We sought feedback on the draft consensus from other stakeholders, including teachers. After considering the feedback, nine judges independently reassessed the prioritised concepts and reached a consensus. The final set of concepts was determined after user-testing prototypes and pilot-testing the resources. RESULTS: The first panel of judges prioritised 29 concepts. Based on feedback from teachers, students, curriculum specialists, and members of the research team, two concepts were dropped. A second panel of nine judges prioritised 17 of the 27 concepts that emerged from the initial prioritisation and feedback. Based on feedback on prototypes of lessons and pilot-testing a set of 10 lessons, we determined that it was possible to introduce nine concepts in 10 single-period (40-minute) lessons. We included eight of the 17 prioritised concepts and one additional concept. CONCLUSION: Using an iterative process with explicit criteria, we prioritised nine concepts as a starting point for students to learn to think critically about healthcare claims and choices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10081733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100817332023-04-08 Prioritisation of Informed Health Choices (IHC) key concepts to be included in lower secondary school resources: A consensus study Agaba, Joseph Jude Chesire, Faith Mugisha, Michael Nandi, Pamela Njue, Jane Nsangi, Allen Nsengimana, Venuste Oyuga, Cyril Rutiyomba, Florian Semakula, Daniel Ssenyonga, Ronald Uwimana, Innocent Oxman, Andrew David PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The Informed Health Choices Key Concepts are principles for thinking critically about healthcare claims and deciding what to do. The Key Concepts provide a framework for designing curricula, learning resources, and evaluation tools. OBJECTIVES: To prioritise which of the 49 Key Concepts to include in resources for lower secondary schools in East Africa. METHODS: Twelve judges used an iterative process to reach a consensus. The judges were curriculum specialists, teachers, and researchers from Kenya, Uganda, and Rwanda. After familiarising themselves with the concepts, they pilot-tested draft criteria for selecting and ordering the concepts. After agreeing on the criteria, nine judges independently assessed all 49 concepts and reached an initial consensus. We sought feedback on the draft consensus from other stakeholders, including teachers. After considering the feedback, nine judges independently reassessed the prioritised concepts and reached a consensus. The final set of concepts was determined after user-testing prototypes and pilot-testing the resources. RESULTS: The first panel of judges prioritised 29 concepts. Based on feedback from teachers, students, curriculum specialists, and members of the research team, two concepts were dropped. A second panel of nine judges prioritised 17 of the 27 concepts that emerged from the initial prioritisation and feedback. Based on feedback on prototypes of lessons and pilot-testing a set of 10 lessons, we determined that it was possible to introduce nine concepts in 10 single-period (40-minute) lessons. We included eight of the 17 prioritised concepts and one additional concept. CONCLUSION: Using an iterative process with explicit criteria, we prioritised nine concepts as a starting point for students to learn to think critically about healthcare claims and choices. Public Library of Science 2023-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10081733/ /pubmed/37027357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267422 Text en © 2023 Agaba et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Agaba, Joseph Jude
Chesire, Faith
Mugisha, Michael
Nandi, Pamela
Njue, Jane
Nsangi, Allen
Nsengimana, Venuste
Oyuga, Cyril
Rutiyomba, Florian
Semakula, Daniel
Ssenyonga, Ronald
Uwimana, Innocent
Oxman, Andrew David
Prioritisation of Informed Health Choices (IHC) key concepts to be included in lower secondary school resources: A consensus study
title Prioritisation of Informed Health Choices (IHC) key concepts to be included in lower secondary school resources: A consensus study
title_full Prioritisation of Informed Health Choices (IHC) key concepts to be included in lower secondary school resources: A consensus study
title_fullStr Prioritisation of Informed Health Choices (IHC) key concepts to be included in lower secondary school resources: A consensus study
title_full_unstemmed Prioritisation of Informed Health Choices (IHC) key concepts to be included in lower secondary school resources: A consensus study
title_short Prioritisation of Informed Health Choices (IHC) key concepts to be included in lower secondary school resources: A consensus study
title_sort prioritisation of informed health choices (ihc) key concepts to be included in lower secondary school resources: a consensus study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37027357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267422
work_keys_str_mv AT agabajosephjude prioritisationofinformedhealthchoicesihckeyconceptstobeincludedinlowersecondaryschoolresourcesaconsensusstudy
AT chesirefaith prioritisationofinformedhealthchoicesihckeyconceptstobeincludedinlowersecondaryschoolresourcesaconsensusstudy
AT mugishamichael prioritisationofinformedhealthchoicesihckeyconceptstobeincludedinlowersecondaryschoolresourcesaconsensusstudy
AT nandipamela prioritisationofinformedhealthchoicesihckeyconceptstobeincludedinlowersecondaryschoolresourcesaconsensusstudy
AT njuejane prioritisationofinformedhealthchoicesihckeyconceptstobeincludedinlowersecondaryschoolresourcesaconsensusstudy
AT nsangiallen prioritisationofinformedhealthchoicesihckeyconceptstobeincludedinlowersecondaryschoolresourcesaconsensusstudy
AT nsengimanavenuste prioritisationofinformedhealthchoicesihckeyconceptstobeincludedinlowersecondaryschoolresourcesaconsensusstudy
AT oyugacyril prioritisationofinformedhealthchoicesihckeyconceptstobeincludedinlowersecondaryschoolresourcesaconsensusstudy
AT rutiyombaflorian prioritisationofinformedhealthchoicesihckeyconceptstobeincludedinlowersecondaryschoolresourcesaconsensusstudy
AT semakuladaniel prioritisationofinformedhealthchoicesihckeyconceptstobeincludedinlowersecondaryschoolresourcesaconsensusstudy
AT ssenyongaronald prioritisationofinformedhealthchoicesihckeyconceptstobeincludedinlowersecondaryschoolresourcesaconsensusstudy
AT uwimanainnocent prioritisationofinformedhealthchoicesihckeyconceptstobeincludedinlowersecondaryschoolresourcesaconsensusstudy
AT oxmanandrewdavid prioritisationofinformedhealthchoicesihckeyconceptstobeincludedinlowersecondaryschoolresourcesaconsensusstudy