Cargando…
Prioritisation of Informed Health Choices (IHC) key concepts to be included in lower secondary school resources: A consensus study
BACKGROUND: The Informed Health Choices Key Concepts are principles for thinking critically about healthcare claims and deciding what to do. The Key Concepts provide a framework for designing curricula, learning resources, and evaluation tools. OBJECTIVES: To prioritise which of the 49 Key Concepts...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37027357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267422 |
_version_ | 1785021177328041984 |
---|---|
author | Agaba, Joseph Jude Chesire, Faith Mugisha, Michael Nandi, Pamela Njue, Jane Nsangi, Allen Nsengimana, Venuste Oyuga, Cyril Rutiyomba, Florian Semakula, Daniel Ssenyonga, Ronald Uwimana, Innocent Oxman, Andrew David |
author_facet | Agaba, Joseph Jude Chesire, Faith Mugisha, Michael Nandi, Pamela Njue, Jane Nsangi, Allen Nsengimana, Venuste Oyuga, Cyril Rutiyomba, Florian Semakula, Daniel Ssenyonga, Ronald Uwimana, Innocent Oxman, Andrew David |
author_sort | Agaba, Joseph Jude |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Informed Health Choices Key Concepts are principles for thinking critically about healthcare claims and deciding what to do. The Key Concepts provide a framework for designing curricula, learning resources, and evaluation tools. OBJECTIVES: To prioritise which of the 49 Key Concepts to include in resources for lower secondary schools in East Africa. METHODS: Twelve judges used an iterative process to reach a consensus. The judges were curriculum specialists, teachers, and researchers from Kenya, Uganda, and Rwanda. After familiarising themselves with the concepts, they pilot-tested draft criteria for selecting and ordering the concepts. After agreeing on the criteria, nine judges independently assessed all 49 concepts and reached an initial consensus. We sought feedback on the draft consensus from other stakeholders, including teachers. After considering the feedback, nine judges independently reassessed the prioritised concepts and reached a consensus. The final set of concepts was determined after user-testing prototypes and pilot-testing the resources. RESULTS: The first panel of judges prioritised 29 concepts. Based on feedback from teachers, students, curriculum specialists, and members of the research team, two concepts were dropped. A second panel of nine judges prioritised 17 of the 27 concepts that emerged from the initial prioritisation and feedback. Based on feedback on prototypes of lessons and pilot-testing a set of 10 lessons, we determined that it was possible to introduce nine concepts in 10 single-period (40-minute) lessons. We included eight of the 17 prioritised concepts and one additional concept. CONCLUSION: Using an iterative process with explicit criteria, we prioritised nine concepts as a starting point for students to learn to think critically about healthcare claims and choices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10081733 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100817332023-04-08 Prioritisation of Informed Health Choices (IHC) key concepts to be included in lower secondary school resources: A consensus study Agaba, Joseph Jude Chesire, Faith Mugisha, Michael Nandi, Pamela Njue, Jane Nsangi, Allen Nsengimana, Venuste Oyuga, Cyril Rutiyomba, Florian Semakula, Daniel Ssenyonga, Ronald Uwimana, Innocent Oxman, Andrew David PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The Informed Health Choices Key Concepts are principles for thinking critically about healthcare claims and deciding what to do. The Key Concepts provide a framework for designing curricula, learning resources, and evaluation tools. OBJECTIVES: To prioritise which of the 49 Key Concepts to include in resources for lower secondary schools in East Africa. METHODS: Twelve judges used an iterative process to reach a consensus. The judges were curriculum specialists, teachers, and researchers from Kenya, Uganda, and Rwanda. After familiarising themselves with the concepts, they pilot-tested draft criteria for selecting and ordering the concepts. After agreeing on the criteria, nine judges independently assessed all 49 concepts and reached an initial consensus. We sought feedback on the draft consensus from other stakeholders, including teachers. After considering the feedback, nine judges independently reassessed the prioritised concepts and reached a consensus. The final set of concepts was determined after user-testing prototypes and pilot-testing the resources. RESULTS: The first panel of judges prioritised 29 concepts. Based on feedback from teachers, students, curriculum specialists, and members of the research team, two concepts were dropped. A second panel of nine judges prioritised 17 of the 27 concepts that emerged from the initial prioritisation and feedback. Based on feedback on prototypes of lessons and pilot-testing a set of 10 lessons, we determined that it was possible to introduce nine concepts in 10 single-period (40-minute) lessons. We included eight of the 17 prioritised concepts and one additional concept. CONCLUSION: Using an iterative process with explicit criteria, we prioritised nine concepts as a starting point for students to learn to think critically about healthcare claims and choices. Public Library of Science 2023-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10081733/ /pubmed/37027357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267422 Text en © 2023 Agaba et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Agaba, Joseph Jude Chesire, Faith Mugisha, Michael Nandi, Pamela Njue, Jane Nsangi, Allen Nsengimana, Venuste Oyuga, Cyril Rutiyomba, Florian Semakula, Daniel Ssenyonga, Ronald Uwimana, Innocent Oxman, Andrew David Prioritisation of Informed Health Choices (IHC) key concepts to be included in lower secondary school resources: A consensus study |
title | Prioritisation of Informed Health Choices (IHC) key concepts to be included in lower secondary school resources: A consensus study |
title_full | Prioritisation of Informed Health Choices (IHC) key concepts to be included in lower secondary school resources: A consensus study |
title_fullStr | Prioritisation of Informed Health Choices (IHC) key concepts to be included in lower secondary school resources: A consensus study |
title_full_unstemmed | Prioritisation of Informed Health Choices (IHC) key concepts to be included in lower secondary school resources: A consensus study |
title_short | Prioritisation of Informed Health Choices (IHC) key concepts to be included in lower secondary school resources: A consensus study |
title_sort | prioritisation of informed health choices (ihc) key concepts to be included in lower secondary school resources: a consensus study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37027357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267422 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT agabajosephjude prioritisationofinformedhealthchoicesihckeyconceptstobeincludedinlowersecondaryschoolresourcesaconsensusstudy AT chesirefaith prioritisationofinformedhealthchoicesihckeyconceptstobeincludedinlowersecondaryschoolresourcesaconsensusstudy AT mugishamichael prioritisationofinformedhealthchoicesihckeyconceptstobeincludedinlowersecondaryschoolresourcesaconsensusstudy AT nandipamela prioritisationofinformedhealthchoicesihckeyconceptstobeincludedinlowersecondaryschoolresourcesaconsensusstudy AT njuejane prioritisationofinformedhealthchoicesihckeyconceptstobeincludedinlowersecondaryschoolresourcesaconsensusstudy AT nsangiallen prioritisationofinformedhealthchoicesihckeyconceptstobeincludedinlowersecondaryschoolresourcesaconsensusstudy AT nsengimanavenuste prioritisationofinformedhealthchoicesihckeyconceptstobeincludedinlowersecondaryschoolresourcesaconsensusstudy AT oyugacyril prioritisationofinformedhealthchoicesihckeyconceptstobeincludedinlowersecondaryschoolresourcesaconsensusstudy AT rutiyombaflorian prioritisationofinformedhealthchoicesihckeyconceptstobeincludedinlowersecondaryschoolresourcesaconsensusstudy AT semakuladaniel prioritisationofinformedhealthchoicesihckeyconceptstobeincludedinlowersecondaryschoolresourcesaconsensusstudy AT ssenyongaronald prioritisationofinformedhealthchoicesihckeyconceptstobeincludedinlowersecondaryschoolresourcesaconsensusstudy AT uwimanainnocent prioritisationofinformedhealthchoicesihckeyconceptstobeincludedinlowersecondaryschoolresourcesaconsensusstudy AT oxmanandrewdavid prioritisationofinformedhealthchoicesihckeyconceptstobeincludedinlowersecondaryschoolresourcesaconsensusstudy |