Cargando…

Facilitators and barriers to community engagement in the Global Polio Eradication Initiative–A mixed methods study

Community engagement (CE) is an important component of public health research and program implementation, especially in low- and middle-income countries. More recently, CE activities have been utilized to develop partnerships in research and program implementation processes, and advocate for policy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agrawal, Priyanka, Neel, Abigail, Deresse, Assefa Seme, Gerber, Sue, Alonge, Olakunle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37027352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001643
_version_ 1785021178018004992
author Agrawal, Priyanka
Neel, Abigail
Deresse, Assefa Seme
Gerber, Sue
Alonge, Olakunle
author_facet Agrawal, Priyanka
Neel, Abigail
Deresse, Assefa Seme
Gerber, Sue
Alonge, Olakunle
author_sort Agrawal, Priyanka
collection PubMed
description Community engagement (CE) is an important component of public health research and program implementation, especially in low- and middle-income countries. More recently, CE activities have been utilized to develop partnerships in research and program implementation processes, and advocate for policy recommendations with the aim to improve acceptance and reduce disparities of public health research activities and benefits in the involved communities. Utilizing the tacit knowledge gained from the Global Polio Eradication Initiative, this paper highlights the contributors and challenges to the implementation of the GPEI program’s community engagement initiatives from an implementers’ perspective. The study took a mixed methods approach to analyze data collected from the Synthesis and Translation of Research and Innovations from Polio Eradication (STRIPE) project, which conducted an online survey and hosted key informant interviews with individuals who had been engaged with the GPEI program from 1988 onwards for at least 12 or more continuous months. An analysis of data limited to individuals (32%, N = 3659) who were primarily involved in CE activities revealed that around 24% were front-line healthcare workers, 21% were supervisors and 8% were surveillance officers. CE activities mainly focused on building trust within the communities, addressing misinformation, myths and fears around vaccinations, mobilization to reach high-risk or hard to reach populations, as well as building ownership and buy in from the communities. The strength of the implemental process of a program (38.7%) was among the key drivers of success, coupled with personal beliefs and characteristics of the implementers (25.3%). Social, political, and financial forces received mixed opinions as to their importance, depending on the stage of execution and readiness of the communities to accept the programs. Lessons learnt from the GPEI program provide tried and tested best practices and evidence for strategies that would work in diverse backgrounds with some customization to suit the needs of the situation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10081736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100817362023-04-08 Facilitators and barriers to community engagement in the Global Polio Eradication Initiative–A mixed methods study Agrawal, Priyanka Neel, Abigail Deresse, Assefa Seme Gerber, Sue Alonge, Olakunle PLOS Glob Public Health Research Article Community engagement (CE) is an important component of public health research and program implementation, especially in low- and middle-income countries. More recently, CE activities have been utilized to develop partnerships in research and program implementation processes, and advocate for policy recommendations with the aim to improve acceptance and reduce disparities of public health research activities and benefits in the involved communities. Utilizing the tacit knowledge gained from the Global Polio Eradication Initiative, this paper highlights the contributors and challenges to the implementation of the GPEI program’s community engagement initiatives from an implementers’ perspective. The study took a mixed methods approach to analyze data collected from the Synthesis and Translation of Research and Innovations from Polio Eradication (STRIPE) project, which conducted an online survey and hosted key informant interviews with individuals who had been engaged with the GPEI program from 1988 onwards for at least 12 or more continuous months. An analysis of data limited to individuals (32%, N = 3659) who were primarily involved in CE activities revealed that around 24% were front-line healthcare workers, 21% were supervisors and 8% were surveillance officers. CE activities mainly focused on building trust within the communities, addressing misinformation, myths and fears around vaccinations, mobilization to reach high-risk or hard to reach populations, as well as building ownership and buy in from the communities. The strength of the implemental process of a program (38.7%) was among the key drivers of success, coupled with personal beliefs and characteristics of the implementers (25.3%). Social, political, and financial forces received mixed opinions as to their importance, depending on the stage of execution and readiness of the communities to accept the programs. Lessons learnt from the GPEI program provide tried and tested best practices and evidence for strategies that would work in diverse backgrounds with some customization to suit the needs of the situation. Public Library of Science 2023-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10081736/ /pubmed/37027352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001643 Text en © 2023 Agrawal et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Agrawal, Priyanka
Neel, Abigail
Deresse, Assefa Seme
Gerber, Sue
Alonge, Olakunle
Facilitators and barriers to community engagement in the Global Polio Eradication Initiative–A mixed methods study
title Facilitators and barriers to community engagement in the Global Polio Eradication Initiative–A mixed methods study
title_full Facilitators and barriers to community engagement in the Global Polio Eradication Initiative–A mixed methods study
title_fullStr Facilitators and barriers to community engagement in the Global Polio Eradication Initiative–A mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Facilitators and barriers to community engagement in the Global Polio Eradication Initiative–A mixed methods study
title_short Facilitators and barriers to community engagement in the Global Polio Eradication Initiative–A mixed methods study
title_sort facilitators and barriers to community engagement in the global polio eradication initiative–a mixed methods study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37027352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001643
work_keys_str_mv AT agrawalpriyanka facilitatorsandbarrierstocommunityengagementintheglobalpolioeradicationinitiativeamixedmethodsstudy
AT neelabigail facilitatorsandbarrierstocommunityengagementintheglobalpolioeradicationinitiativeamixedmethodsstudy
AT deresseassefaseme facilitatorsandbarrierstocommunityengagementintheglobalpolioeradicationinitiativeamixedmethodsstudy
AT gerbersue facilitatorsandbarrierstocommunityengagementintheglobalpolioeradicationinitiativeamixedmethodsstudy
AT alongeolakunle facilitatorsandbarrierstocommunityengagementintheglobalpolioeradicationinitiativeamixedmethodsstudy