Cargando…

Mining and quantitative evaluation of COVID-19 policy tools in China

Policy quantitative analysis can effectively evaluate the government’s response to COVID-19 emergency management effect, and provide reference for the government to formulate follow-up policies. The content mining method is used to explore the 301 COVID-19 policies issued by the Central government o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Jianzhao, Li, Na, Cheng, Luming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37027438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284143
_version_ 1785021181454188544
author Liu, Jianzhao
Li, Na
Cheng, Luming
author_facet Liu, Jianzhao
Li, Na
Cheng, Luming
author_sort Liu, Jianzhao
collection PubMed
description Policy quantitative analysis can effectively evaluate the government’s response to COVID-19 emergency management effect, and provide reference for the government to formulate follow-up policies. The content mining method is used to explore the 301 COVID-19 policies issued by the Central government of China since the outbreak of the epidemic in a multi-dimensional manner and comprehensively analyze the characteristics of epidemic prevention policies. Then, based on policy evaluation theory and data fusion theory, a COVID-19 policy evaluation model based on PMC-AE is established to evaluate quantitatively eight representative COVID-19 policy texts. The results show that: Firstly, China’s COVID-19 policies are mainly aimed at providing economic support to enterprises and individuals affected by the epidemic, issued by 49 departments, and include 32.7 percent supply-level and 28.5 percent demand-level, and 25.8 percent environment-level. In addition, strategy-level policies accounted for at least 13 percent. Secondly, according to the principle of openness, authority, relevance and normative principle, eight COVID-19 policies are evaluated by PMC-AE model. Four policies are level Ⅰ policies, three policies are level Ⅱ policies and one policy is level Ⅲ policies. The reason for its low score is mainly affected by four indexes: policy evaluation, incentive measures, policy emphasis and policy receptor. To sum up, China has taken both non-structural and structural measures to prevent and control the epidemic. The introduction of specific epidemic prevention and control policy has realized complex intervention in the whole process of epidemic prevention and control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10081750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100817502023-04-08 Mining and quantitative evaluation of COVID-19 policy tools in China Liu, Jianzhao Li, Na Cheng, Luming PLoS One Research Article Policy quantitative analysis can effectively evaluate the government’s response to COVID-19 emergency management effect, and provide reference for the government to formulate follow-up policies. The content mining method is used to explore the 301 COVID-19 policies issued by the Central government of China since the outbreak of the epidemic in a multi-dimensional manner and comprehensively analyze the characteristics of epidemic prevention policies. Then, based on policy evaluation theory and data fusion theory, a COVID-19 policy evaluation model based on PMC-AE is established to evaluate quantitatively eight representative COVID-19 policy texts. The results show that: Firstly, China’s COVID-19 policies are mainly aimed at providing economic support to enterprises and individuals affected by the epidemic, issued by 49 departments, and include 32.7 percent supply-level and 28.5 percent demand-level, and 25.8 percent environment-level. In addition, strategy-level policies accounted for at least 13 percent. Secondly, according to the principle of openness, authority, relevance and normative principle, eight COVID-19 policies are evaluated by PMC-AE model. Four policies are level Ⅰ policies, three policies are level Ⅱ policies and one policy is level Ⅲ policies. The reason for its low score is mainly affected by four indexes: policy evaluation, incentive measures, policy emphasis and policy receptor. To sum up, China has taken both non-structural and structural measures to prevent and control the epidemic. The introduction of specific epidemic prevention and control policy has realized complex intervention in the whole process of epidemic prevention and control. Public Library of Science 2023-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10081750/ /pubmed/37027438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284143 Text en © 2023 Liu et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Jianzhao
Li, Na
Cheng, Luming
Mining and quantitative evaluation of COVID-19 policy tools in China
title Mining and quantitative evaluation of COVID-19 policy tools in China
title_full Mining and quantitative evaluation of COVID-19 policy tools in China
title_fullStr Mining and quantitative evaluation of COVID-19 policy tools in China
title_full_unstemmed Mining and quantitative evaluation of COVID-19 policy tools in China
title_short Mining and quantitative evaluation of COVID-19 policy tools in China
title_sort mining and quantitative evaluation of covid-19 policy tools in china
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37027438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284143
work_keys_str_mv AT liujianzhao miningandquantitativeevaluationofcovid19policytoolsinchina
AT lina miningandquantitativeevaluationofcovid19policytoolsinchina
AT chengluming miningandquantitativeevaluationofcovid19policytoolsinchina