Cargando…

Sensitivity of outcome instruments in a priori selected patient groups after traumatic brain injury: Results from the CENTER-TBI study

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can negatively impact patients’ lives on many dimensions. Multiple instruments are available for evaluating TBI outcomes, but it is still unclear which instruments are the most sensitive for that purpose. This study examines the sensitivity of nine outcome instruments in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: von Steinbuechel, Nicole, Rauen, Katrin, Covic, Amra, Krenz, Ugne, Bockhop, Fabian, Mueller, Isabelle, Cunitz, Katrin, Polinder, Suzanne, Steyerberg, Ewout W., Vester, Johannes, Zeldovich, Marina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37027437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280796
_version_ 1785021193423683584
author von Steinbuechel, Nicole
Rauen, Katrin
Covic, Amra
Krenz, Ugne
Bockhop, Fabian
Mueller, Isabelle
Cunitz, Katrin
Polinder, Suzanne
Steyerberg, Ewout W.
Vester, Johannes
Zeldovich, Marina
author_facet von Steinbuechel, Nicole
Rauen, Katrin
Covic, Amra
Krenz, Ugne
Bockhop, Fabian
Mueller, Isabelle
Cunitz, Katrin
Polinder, Suzanne
Steyerberg, Ewout W.
Vester, Johannes
Zeldovich, Marina
author_sort von Steinbuechel, Nicole
collection PubMed
description Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can negatively impact patients’ lives on many dimensions. Multiple instruments are available for evaluating TBI outcomes, but it is still unclear which instruments are the most sensitive for that purpose. This study examines the sensitivity of nine outcome instruments in terms of their ability to discriminate within and between specific patient groups, selected a priori as identified from the literature, at three different time points within a year after TBI (i.e., 3, 6, and 12 months post injury). The sensitivity of the instruments to sociodemographic (sex, age, education), premorbid (psychological health status), and injury-related (clinical care pathways, TBI and extracranial injury severity) factors was assessed by means of cross-sectional multivariate Wei-Lachin analyses. The Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE)–the standard in the field of TBI for measuring functional recovery–demonstrated the highest sensitivity in most group comparisons. However, as single functional scale, it may not be able to reflect the multidimensional nature of the outcome. Therefore, the GOSE was used as a reference for further sensitivity analyses on more specific outcome scales, addressing further potential deficits following TBI. The physical component summary score (PCS) of the generic health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments (SF-36v2/-12v2) and the TBI-specific HRQOL instruments (QOLIBRI/-OS) were most sensitive in distinguishing recovery after TBI across all time points and patient groups, followed by the RPQ assessing post-concussion symptoms and the PHQ-9 measuring depression. The SF-36v2/-12v2 mental component summary score and the GAD-7 measuring anxiety were less sensitive in several group comparisons. The assessment of the functional recovery status combined with generic HRQOL (the PCS of the SF-12v2), disease-specific HRQOL (QOLIBRI-OS), and post-concussion symptoms (RPQ) can provide a sensitive, comprehensive, yet time-efficient evaluation of the health status of individuals after TBI in different patient groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10081802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100818022023-04-08 Sensitivity of outcome instruments in a priori selected patient groups after traumatic brain injury: Results from the CENTER-TBI study von Steinbuechel, Nicole Rauen, Katrin Covic, Amra Krenz, Ugne Bockhop, Fabian Mueller, Isabelle Cunitz, Katrin Polinder, Suzanne Steyerberg, Ewout W. Vester, Johannes Zeldovich, Marina PLoS One Research Article Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can negatively impact patients’ lives on many dimensions. Multiple instruments are available for evaluating TBI outcomes, but it is still unclear which instruments are the most sensitive for that purpose. This study examines the sensitivity of nine outcome instruments in terms of their ability to discriminate within and between specific patient groups, selected a priori as identified from the literature, at three different time points within a year after TBI (i.e., 3, 6, and 12 months post injury). The sensitivity of the instruments to sociodemographic (sex, age, education), premorbid (psychological health status), and injury-related (clinical care pathways, TBI and extracranial injury severity) factors was assessed by means of cross-sectional multivariate Wei-Lachin analyses. The Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE)–the standard in the field of TBI for measuring functional recovery–demonstrated the highest sensitivity in most group comparisons. However, as single functional scale, it may not be able to reflect the multidimensional nature of the outcome. Therefore, the GOSE was used as a reference for further sensitivity analyses on more specific outcome scales, addressing further potential deficits following TBI. The physical component summary score (PCS) of the generic health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments (SF-36v2/-12v2) and the TBI-specific HRQOL instruments (QOLIBRI/-OS) were most sensitive in distinguishing recovery after TBI across all time points and patient groups, followed by the RPQ assessing post-concussion symptoms and the PHQ-9 measuring depression. The SF-36v2/-12v2 mental component summary score and the GAD-7 measuring anxiety were less sensitive in several group comparisons. The assessment of the functional recovery status combined with generic HRQOL (the PCS of the SF-12v2), disease-specific HRQOL (QOLIBRI-OS), and post-concussion symptoms (RPQ) can provide a sensitive, comprehensive, yet time-efficient evaluation of the health status of individuals after TBI in different patient groups. Public Library of Science 2023-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10081802/ /pubmed/37027437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280796 Text en © 2023 von Steinbuechel et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
von Steinbuechel, Nicole
Rauen, Katrin
Covic, Amra
Krenz, Ugne
Bockhop, Fabian
Mueller, Isabelle
Cunitz, Katrin
Polinder, Suzanne
Steyerberg, Ewout W.
Vester, Johannes
Zeldovich, Marina
Sensitivity of outcome instruments in a priori selected patient groups after traumatic brain injury: Results from the CENTER-TBI study
title Sensitivity of outcome instruments in a priori selected patient groups after traumatic brain injury: Results from the CENTER-TBI study
title_full Sensitivity of outcome instruments in a priori selected patient groups after traumatic brain injury: Results from the CENTER-TBI study
title_fullStr Sensitivity of outcome instruments in a priori selected patient groups after traumatic brain injury: Results from the CENTER-TBI study
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity of outcome instruments in a priori selected patient groups after traumatic brain injury: Results from the CENTER-TBI study
title_short Sensitivity of outcome instruments in a priori selected patient groups after traumatic brain injury: Results from the CENTER-TBI study
title_sort sensitivity of outcome instruments in a priori selected patient groups after traumatic brain injury: results from the center-tbi study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37027437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280796
work_keys_str_mv AT vonsteinbuechelnicole sensitivityofoutcomeinstrumentsinaprioriselectedpatientgroupsaftertraumaticbraininjuryresultsfromthecentertbistudy
AT rauenkatrin sensitivityofoutcomeinstrumentsinaprioriselectedpatientgroupsaftertraumaticbraininjuryresultsfromthecentertbistudy
AT covicamra sensitivityofoutcomeinstrumentsinaprioriselectedpatientgroupsaftertraumaticbraininjuryresultsfromthecentertbistudy
AT krenzugne sensitivityofoutcomeinstrumentsinaprioriselectedpatientgroupsaftertraumaticbraininjuryresultsfromthecentertbistudy
AT bockhopfabian sensitivityofoutcomeinstrumentsinaprioriselectedpatientgroupsaftertraumaticbraininjuryresultsfromthecentertbistudy
AT muellerisabelle sensitivityofoutcomeinstrumentsinaprioriselectedpatientgroupsaftertraumaticbraininjuryresultsfromthecentertbistudy
AT cunitzkatrin sensitivityofoutcomeinstrumentsinaprioriselectedpatientgroupsaftertraumaticbraininjuryresultsfromthecentertbistudy
AT polindersuzanne sensitivityofoutcomeinstrumentsinaprioriselectedpatientgroupsaftertraumaticbraininjuryresultsfromthecentertbistudy
AT steyerbergewoutw sensitivityofoutcomeinstrumentsinaprioriselectedpatientgroupsaftertraumaticbraininjuryresultsfromthecentertbistudy
AT vesterjohannes sensitivityofoutcomeinstrumentsinaprioriselectedpatientgroupsaftertraumaticbraininjuryresultsfromthecentertbistudy
AT zeldovichmarina sensitivityofoutcomeinstrumentsinaprioriselectedpatientgroupsaftertraumaticbraininjuryresultsfromthecentertbistudy
AT sensitivityofoutcomeinstrumentsinaprioriselectedpatientgroupsaftertraumaticbraininjuryresultsfromthecentertbistudy