Cargando…

Poultry farmers’ knowledge, attitude, and practices toward poultry waste management in Bangladesh

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The improper handling of poultry litter and waste poses risks to humans and environment by introducing certain compounds, elements, and pathogenic microorganisms into the surrounding environment and food chain. However, understanding the farmers’ knowledge, attitude, and practice...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmed, Soshe, Moni, Mst. I. Z., Begum, Maksuda, Sultana, Mst. R., Kabir, Aurangazeb, Eqbal, Md. J., Das, Sunny K., Ullah, Woli, Haque, Tasmin S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Veterinary World 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10082732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37041846
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2023.554-563
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND AIM: The improper handling of poultry litter and waste poses risks to humans and environment by introducing certain compounds, elements, and pathogenic microorganisms into the surrounding environment and food chain. However, understanding the farmers’ knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) could provide insights into the constraints that hinder the appropriate adoption of waste management. Therefore, this study aimed to assess poultry farmers’ KAP regarding waste management issues. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional KAP study was conducted with native poultry keepers and small-scale commercial poultry farmers in seven districts of Bangladesh. In the survey, 385 poultry producers were interviewed using validated structured questionnaires through face-to-face interviews to collect the quantitative data in their domiciles. RESULTS: The overall KAP of farmers regarding poultry waste management issues demonstrated a low level of KAP (p = 0.001). The analysis shows that roughly 5% of farmers have a high level of knowledge of poultry waste management issues, followed by around one-third of respondents having a moderate level of knowledge. Considering the attitude domain, more than one-fifth of native poultry keepers and nearly two-thirds of commercial producers demonstrated a low level of attitude toward poultry waste management. Considering the overall analysis, roughly half of the respondents found a high level of attitude, and over half of the farmers showed a moderate level of attitude toward poultry waste management issues. The analysis showed that the level of good practices for native and commercial poultry production systems is estimated at 77.3% versus 45.9%, respectively, despite the farmers’ lesser knowledge and attitudes toward poultry waste management systems. Overall, analysis showed that nearly 60% and 40% of poultry producers had high and moderate levels, respectively, of good practices in poultry waste management issues. CONCLUSION: Analysis of the KAP data shows that farmers had a low level of KAP toward poultry waste management. The result of this study will assist in formulating appropriate strategies and to adopt poultry waste management solutions by poultry farmers to reduce environmental degradation.