Cargando…

Dermal Regeneration Template: Reconstruction in Oral Cancer Defects

BACKGROUND: Post ablative oral mucosal defect resulting from the removal of tumors can be treated with various techniques. PURPOSE: In this paper, we are showing what, in our experience, are the advantages and disadvantages given using biosynthetic skin substitutes when dealing with this kind of les...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mangini, Nicolò, Galvano, Francesca, Pucci, Resi, Battisti, Andrea, Cassoni, Andrea, Valentini, Valentino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer India 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10082868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37041955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12663-023-01889-5
_version_ 1785021401406636032
author Mangini, Nicolò
Galvano, Francesca
Pucci, Resi
Battisti, Andrea
Cassoni, Andrea
Valentini, Valentino
author_facet Mangini, Nicolò
Galvano, Francesca
Pucci, Resi
Battisti, Andrea
Cassoni, Andrea
Valentini, Valentino
author_sort Mangini, Nicolò
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Post ablative oral mucosal defect resulting from the removal of tumors can be treated with various techniques. PURPOSE: In this paper, we are showing what, in our experience, are the advantages and disadvantages given using biosynthetic skin substitutes when dealing with this kind of lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients included in the sample came to our attention with both neoplastic lesions (11 subjects) and important scar retraction after previous oncologic surgery (1 subject). All patients underwent trans-oral resection surgery following the same surgical protocol and post ablative oral mucosal defect were treated using the dermal regeneration template. The surgical defect location, size, and time of removal of the silicone layer varied from one subject to the other. RESULTS: Most patients showed good healing with reduced scarring and adequate remucosalisation of the defect. The main complications were shown in a palatal lesion treated with concomitant osteal resection, which developed an oroantral fistula at follow up, and tongue lesions which showed some scarring. CONCLUSIONS: Given our experience, we would advise using dermal substitutes when reconstructing oral defects only after a cautious evaluation of the area of the lesion, the gap size, the possible adherence of the membrane to the gap, and the presence of tissue supporting the overlying membrane.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10082868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer India
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100828682023-04-10 Dermal Regeneration Template: Reconstruction in Oral Cancer Defects Mangini, Nicolò Galvano, Francesca Pucci, Resi Battisti, Andrea Cassoni, Andrea Valentini, Valentino J Maxillofac Oral Surg Clinical Paper BACKGROUND: Post ablative oral mucosal defect resulting from the removal of tumors can be treated with various techniques. PURPOSE: In this paper, we are showing what, in our experience, are the advantages and disadvantages given using biosynthetic skin substitutes when dealing with this kind of lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients included in the sample came to our attention with both neoplastic lesions (11 subjects) and important scar retraction after previous oncologic surgery (1 subject). All patients underwent trans-oral resection surgery following the same surgical protocol and post ablative oral mucosal defect were treated using the dermal regeneration template. The surgical defect location, size, and time of removal of the silicone layer varied from one subject to the other. RESULTS: Most patients showed good healing with reduced scarring and adequate remucosalisation of the defect. The main complications were shown in a palatal lesion treated with concomitant osteal resection, which developed an oroantral fistula at follow up, and tongue lesions which showed some scarring. CONCLUSIONS: Given our experience, we would advise using dermal substitutes when reconstructing oral defects only after a cautious evaluation of the area of the lesion, the gap size, the possible adherence of the membrane to the gap, and the presence of tissue supporting the overlying membrane. Springer India 2023-03-21 2023-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10082868/ /pubmed/37041955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12663-023-01889-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Clinical Paper
Mangini, Nicolò
Galvano, Francesca
Pucci, Resi
Battisti, Andrea
Cassoni, Andrea
Valentini, Valentino
Dermal Regeneration Template: Reconstruction in Oral Cancer Defects
title Dermal Regeneration Template: Reconstruction in Oral Cancer Defects
title_full Dermal Regeneration Template: Reconstruction in Oral Cancer Defects
title_fullStr Dermal Regeneration Template: Reconstruction in Oral Cancer Defects
title_full_unstemmed Dermal Regeneration Template: Reconstruction in Oral Cancer Defects
title_short Dermal Regeneration Template: Reconstruction in Oral Cancer Defects
title_sort dermal regeneration template: reconstruction in oral cancer defects
topic Clinical Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10082868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37041955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12663-023-01889-5
work_keys_str_mv AT mangininicolo dermalregenerationtemplatereconstructioninoralcancerdefects
AT galvanofrancesca dermalregenerationtemplatereconstructioninoralcancerdefects
AT pucciresi dermalregenerationtemplatereconstructioninoralcancerdefects
AT battistiandrea dermalregenerationtemplatereconstructioninoralcancerdefects
AT cassoniandrea dermalregenerationtemplatereconstructioninoralcancerdefects
AT valentinivalentino dermalregenerationtemplatereconstructioninoralcancerdefects