Cargando…
Efficiency determination of J-PET: first plastic scintillators-based PET scanner
BACKGROUND: The Jagiellonian Positron Emission Tomograph is the 3-layer prototype of the first scanner based on plastic scintillators, consisting of 192 half-metre-long strips with readouts at both ends. Compared to crystal-based detectors, plastic scintillators are several times cheaper and could b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10082891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37029849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-023-00546-7 |
_version_ | 1785021402458357760 |
---|---|
author | Sharma, S. Baran, J. Chug, N. Curceanu, C. Czerwiński, E. Dadgar, M. Dulski, K. Eliyan, K. Gajos, A. Gupta-Sharma, N. Hiesmayr, B. C. Kacprzak, K. Kapłon, Ł. Klimaszewski, K. Konieczka, P. Korcyl, G. Kozik, T. Krzemień, W. Kumar, D. Niedźwiecki, Sz. Panek, D. Parzych, S. del Rio, E. Perez Raczyński, L. Choudhary, Shivani Shopa, R. Y. Skurzok, M. Stępień, E. Ł. Tayefi, F. Tayefi, K. Wiślicki, W. Moskal, P. |
author_facet | Sharma, S. Baran, J. Chug, N. Curceanu, C. Czerwiński, E. Dadgar, M. Dulski, K. Eliyan, K. Gajos, A. Gupta-Sharma, N. Hiesmayr, B. C. Kacprzak, K. Kapłon, Ł. Klimaszewski, K. Konieczka, P. Korcyl, G. Kozik, T. Krzemień, W. Kumar, D. Niedźwiecki, Sz. Panek, D. Parzych, S. del Rio, E. Perez Raczyński, L. Choudhary, Shivani Shopa, R. Y. Skurzok, M. Stępień, E. Ł. Tayefi, F. Tayefi, K. Wiślicki, W. Moskal, P. |
author_sort | Sharma, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Jagiellonian Positron Emission Tomograph is the 3-layer prototype of the first scanner based on plastic scintillators, consisting of 192 half-metre-long strips with readouts at both ends. Compared to crystal-based detectors, plastic scintillators are several times cheaper and could be considered as a more economical alternative to crystal scintillators in future PETs. JPET is also a first multi-photon PET prototype. For the development of multi-photon detection, with photon characterized by the continuous energy spectrum, it is important to estimate the efficiency of J-PET as a function of energy deposition. The aim of this work is to determine the registration efficiency of the J-PET tomograph as a function of energy deposition by incident photons and the intrinsic efficiency of the J-PET scanner in detecting photons of different incident energies. In this study, 3-hit events are investigated, where 2-hits are caused by 511 keV photons emitted in [Formula: see text] annihilations, while the third hit is caused by one of the scattered photons. The scattered photon is used to accurately measure the scattering angle and thus the energy deposition. Two hits by a primary and a scattered photon are sufficient to calculate the scattering angle of a photon, while the third hit ensures the precise labeling of the 511 keV photons. RESULTS: By comparing experimental and simulated energy distribution spectra, the registration efficiency of the J-PET scanner was determined in the energy deposition range of 70–270 keV, where it varies between 20 and 100[Formula: see text] . In addition, the intrinsic efficiency of the J-PET was also determined as a function of the energy of the incident photons. CONCLUSION: A method for determining registration efficiency as a function of energy deposition and intrinsic efficiency as a function of incident photon energy of the J-PET scanner was demonstrated. This study is crucial for evaluating the performance of the scanner based on plastic scintillators and its applications as a standard and multi-photon PET systems. The method may be also used in the calibration of Compton-cameras developed for the ion−beam therapy monitoring and simultaneous multi-radionuclide imaging in nuclear medicine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10082891 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100828912023-04-10 Efficiency determination of J-PET: first plastic scintillators-based PET scanner Sharma, S. Baran, J. Chug, N. Curceanu, C. Czerwiński, E. Dadgar, M. Dulski, K. Eliyan, K. Gajos, A. Gupta-Sharma, N. Hiesmayr, B. C. Kacprzak, K. Kapłon, Ł. Klimaszewski, K. Konieczka, P. Korcyl, G. Kozik, T. Krzemień, W. Kumar, D. Niedźwiecki, Sz. Panek, D. Parzych, S. del Rio, E. Perez Raczyński, L. Choudhary, Shivani Shopa, R. Y. Skurzok, M. Stępień, E. Ł. Tayefi, F. Tayefi, K. Wiślicki, W. Moskal, P. EJNMMI Phys Original Research BACKGROUND: The Jagiellonian Positron Emission Tomograph is the 3-layer prototype of the first scanner based on plastic scintillators, consisting of 192 half-metre-long strips with readouts at both ends. Compared to crystal-based detectors, plastic scintillators are several times cheaper and could be considered as a more economical alternative to crystal scintillators in future PETs. JPET is also a first multi-photon PET prototype. For the development of multi-photon detection, with photon characterized by the continuous energy spectrum, it is important to estimate the efficiency of J-PET as a function of energy deposition. The aim of this work is to determine the registration efficiency of the J-PET tomograph as a function of energy deposition by incident photons and the intrinsic efficiency of the J-PET scanner in detecting photons of different incident energies. In this study, 3-hit events are investigated, where 2-hits are caused by 511 keV photons emitted in [Formula: see text] annihilations, while the third hit is caused by one of the scattered photons. The scattered photon is used to accurately measure the scattering angle and thus the energy deposition. Two hits by a primary and a scattered photon are sufficient to calculate the scattering angle of a photon, while the third hit ensures the precise labeling of the 511 keV photons. RESULTS: By comparing experimental and simulated energy distribution spectra, the registration efficiency of the J-PET scanner was determined in the energy deposition range of 70–270 keV, where it varies between 20 and 100[Formula: see text] . In addition, the intrinsic efficiency of the J-PET was also determined as a function of the energy of the incident photons. CONCLUSION: A method for determining registration efficiency as a function of energy deposition and intrinsic efficiency as a function of incident photon energy of the J-PET scanner was demonstrated. This study is crucial for evaluating the performance of the scanner based on plastic scintillators and its applications as a standard and multi-photon PET systems. The method may be also used in the calibration of Compton-cameras developed for the ion−beam therapy monitoring and simultaneous multi-radionuclide imaging in nuclear medicine. Springer International Publishing 2023-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10082891/ /pubmed/37029849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-023-00546-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Sharma, S. Baran, J. Chug, N. Curceanu, C. Czerwiński, E. Dadgar, M. Dulski, K. Eliyan, K. Gajos, A. Gupta-Sharma, N. Hiesmayr, B. C. Kacprzak, K. Kapłon, Ł. Klimaszewski, K. Konieczka, P. Korcyl, G. Kozik, T. Krzemień, W. Kumar, D. Niedźwiecki, Sz. Panek, D. Parzych, S. del Rio, E. Perez Raczyński, L. Choudhary, Shivani Shopa, R. Y. Skurzok, M. Stępień, E. Ł. Tayefi, F. Tayefi, K. Wiślicki, W. Moskal, P. Efficiency determination of J-PET: first plastic scintillators-based PET scanner |
title | Efficiency determination of J-PET: first plastic scintillators-based PET scanner |
title_full | Efficiency determination of J-PET: first plastic scintillators-based PET scanner |
title_fullStr | Efficiency determination of J-PET: first plastic scintillators-based PET scanner |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficiency determination of J-PET: first plastic scintillators-based PET scanner |
title_short | Efficiency determination of J-PET: first plastic scintillators-based PET scanner |
title_sort | efficiency determination of j-pet: first plastic scintillators-based pet scanner |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10082891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37029849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-023-00546-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharmas efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT baranj efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT chugn efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT curceanuc efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT czerwinskie efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT dadgarm efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT dulskik efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT eliyank efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT gajosa efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT guptasharman efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT hiesmayrbc efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT kacprzakk efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT kapłonł efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT klimaszewskik efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT konieczkap efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT korcylg efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT kozikt efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT krzemienw efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT kumard efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT niedzwieckisz efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT panekd efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT parzychs efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT delrioeperez efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT raczynskil efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT choudharyshivani efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT shopary efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT skurzokm efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT stepieneł efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT tayefif efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT tayefik efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT wislickiw efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner AT moskalp efficiencydeterminationofjpetfirstplasticscintillatorsbasedpetscanner |