Cargando…

A Prospective Evaluation of the Association of Ureteral Wall Thickness With Intraoperative Stone Impaction in Ureteroscopy

Background and objective In this study, we aimed to analyze the association of ureteral wall thickness (UWT) measured on non-contrast CT (NCCT) with stone impaction as found in ureteroscopy (URS). Materials and methods We analyzed 43 patients who underwent URS and pneumatic/laser lithotripsy for ure...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rasheed, Yasir, Nazim, Syed M, Mirani, Kaleem K, Zakaria, Maheen, Nasir, Muhammad Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10082950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37041922
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35972
_version_ 1785021408072433664
author Rasheed, Yasir
Nazim, Syed M
Mirani, Kaleem K
Zakaria, Maheen
Nasir, Muhammad Bin
author_facet Rasheed, Yasir
Nazim, Syed M
Mirani, Kaleem K
Zakaria, Maheen
Nasir, Muhammad Bin
author_sort Rasheed, Yasir
collection PubMed
description Background and objective In this study, we aimed to analyze the association of ureteral wall thickness (UWT) measured on non-contrast CT (NCCT) with stone impaction as found in ureteroscopy (URS). Materials and methods We analyzed 43 patients who underwent URS and pneumatic/laser lithotripsy for ureteric stones from May to November 2022. The UWT was measured by an experienced radiologist on NCCT. Clinical predictors of the impacted stone were calculated by univariate and multivariate regression analysis. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated for the UWT cutoff to apply it for impaction with different parameters. We also evaluated the association of intra- and postoperative parameters of the two groups with UWT. Results Out of the 43 patients with stones, 26 (60.46%) patients had impacted stones. Univariate analysis was used to analyze the site (left-sided stone impacted more commonly), stone size, stone density [Hounsfield unit (HU)], hydronephrosis, UWT, and duration between initial presentation and surgery, and multivariate analysis was utilized to assess stone density, as well as UWT's association with impacted stones. The ROC curve showed a cutoff of 3.5 mm for UWT with an accuracy of 0.83. High UWT (≥3.5 mm) was associated with a significantly lower stone-free rate, more complications, and mean operative time as compared to low UWT (<3.5 mm) (p<0.05). Conclusion Based on our findings, high UWT is associated with high rates of impacted stones and a lower stone-free rate when compared to low UWT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10082950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100829502023-04-10 A Prospective Evaluation of the Association of Ureteral Wall Thickness With Intraoperative Stone Impaction in Ureteroscopy Rasheed, Yasir Nazim, Syed M Mirani, Kaleem K Zakaria, Maheen Nasir, Muhammad Bin Cureus Urology Background and objective In this study, we aimed to analyze the association of ureteral wall thickness (UWT) measured on non-contrast CT (NCCT) with stone impaction as found in ureteroscopy (URS). Materials and methods We analyzed 43 patients who underwent URS and pneumatic/laser lithotripsy for ureteric stones from May to November 2022. The UWT was measured by an experienced radiologist on NCCT. Clinical predictors of the impacted stone were calculated by univariate and multivariate regression analysis. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated for the UWT cutoff to apply it for impaction with different parameters. We also evaluated the association of intra- and postoperative parameters of the two groups with UWT. Results Out of the 43 patients with stones, 26 (60.46%) patients had impacted stones. Univariate analysis was used to analyze the site (left-sided stone impacted more commonly), stone size, stone density [Hounsfield unit (HU)], hydronephrosis, UWT, and duration between initial presentation and surgery, and multivariate analysis was utilized to assess stone density, as well as UWT's association with impacted stones. The ROC curve showed a cutoff of 3.5 mm for UWT with an accuracy of 0.83. High UWT (≥3.5 mm) was associated with a significantly lower stone-free rate, more complications, and mean operative time as compared to low UWT (<3.5 mm) (p<0.05). Conclusion Based on our findings, high UWT is associated with high rates of impacted stones and a lower stone-free rate when compared to low UWT. Cureus 2023-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10082950/ /pubmed/37041922 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35972 Text en Copyright © 2023, Rasheed et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Urology
Rasheed, Yasir
Nazim, Syed M
Mirani, Kaleem K
Zakaria, Maheen
Nasir, Muhammad Bin
A Prospective Evaluation of the Association of Ureteral Wall Thickness With Intraoperative Stone Impaction in Ureteroscopy
title A Prospective Evaluation of the Association of Ureteral Wall Thickness With Intraoperative Stone Impaction in Ureteroscopy
title_full A Prospective Evaluation of the Association of Ureteral Wall Thickness With Intraoperative Stone Impaction in Ureteroscopy
title_fullStr A Prospective Evaluation of the Association of Ureteral Wall Thickness With Intraoperative Stone Impaction in Ureteroscopy
title_full_unstemmed A Prospective Evaluation of the Association of Ureteral Wall Thickness With Intraoperative Stone Impaction in Ureteroscopy
title_short A Prospective Evaluation of the Association of Ureteral Wall Thickness With Intraoperative Stone Impaction in Ureteroscopy
title_sort prospective evaluation of the association of ureteral wall thickness with intraoperative stone impaction in ureteroscopy
topic Urology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10082950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37041922
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35972
work_keys_str_mv AT rasheedyasir aprospectiveevaluationoftheassociationofureteralwallthicknesswithintraoperativestoneimpactioninureteroscopy
AT nazimsyedm aprospectiveevaluationoftheassociationofureteralwallthicknesswithintraoperativestoneimpactioninureteroscopy
AT miranikaleemk aprospectiveevaluationoftheassociationofureteralwallthicknesswithintraoperativestoneimpactioninureteroscopy
AT zakariamaheen aprospectiveevaluationoftheassociationofureteralwallthicknesswithintraoperativestoneimpactioninureteroscopy
AT nasirmuhammadbin aprospectiveevaluationoftheassociationofureteralwallthicknesswithintraoperativestoneimpactioninureteroscopy
AT rasheedyasir prospectiveevaluationoftheassociationofureteralwallthicknesswithintraoperativestoneimpactioninureteroscopy
AT nazimsyedm prospectiveevaluationoftheassociationofureteralwallthicknesswithintraoperativestoneimpactioninureteroscopy
AT miranikaleemk prospectiveevaluationoftheassociationofureteralwallthicknesswithintraoperativestoneimpactioninureteroscopy
AT zakariamaheen prospectiveevaluationoftheassociationofureteralwallthicknesswithintraoperativestoneimpactioninureteroscopy
AT nasirmuhammadbin prospectiveevaluationoftheassociationofureteralwallthicknesswithintraoperativestoneimpactioninureteroscopy