Cargando…
Efficacy of air leak test in detection of anastomotic leaks after rectal excision: a retrospective case-controlled study
PURPOSE: Although its efficacy is uncertain, an intraoperative air leak test (ALT) is commonly used to detect mechanical defects following bowel anastomosis. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ALT to detect anastomotic leakage (AL) following rectal excision. METHODS: We reviewed our databa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Surgical Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10083345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37051157 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2023.104.4.214 |
_version_ | 1785021489404182528 |
---|---|
author | Song, Seung Ho Park, Jun Seok Choi, Gyu-Seog Park, Soo Yeon Kim, Hye Jin Lee, Sung-Min Na, Dong-Hee Jeong, Min Hye |
author_facet | Song, Seung Ho Park, Jun Seok Choi, Gyu-Seog Park, Soo Yeon Kim, Hye Jin Lee, Sung-Min Na, Dong-Hee Jeong, Min Hye |
author_sort | Song, Seung Ho |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Although its efficacy is uncertain, an intraoperative air leak test (ALT) is commonly used to detect mechanical defects following bowel anastomosis. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ALT to detect anastomotic leakage (AL) following rectal excision. METHODS: We reviewed our database for patients with rectal cancers who had undergone curative surgery between January 2012 and January 2018. Patients were grouped according to whether or not an ALT was performed. Propensity score analyses were performed to compare outcomes for groups in a 1:1 case-matched cohort. RESULTS: In total, 1,191 patients underwent rectal excision; 438 (219 in each group) formed the case-matched cohort for analysis. The protective stoma rate was 16.0% and 14.6% in the ALT and the no-ALT groups, respectively (P = 0.791). In the ALT group, 2 patients (0.9%) showed a positive result and were treated with rectal tube drainage, resulting in no leakage. There was no significant difference in postoperative AL rate between the groups (ALT group: 4.6% vs. no-ALT group: 4.1%, P > 0.999). CONCLUSION: ALT played a minimal role in detecting AL following rectal excision. Further studies are warranted to validate our results and clarify whether AL can be prevented with ALT or alternative methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10083345 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The Korean Surgical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100833452023-04-11 Efficacy of air leak test in detection of anastomotic leaks after rectal excision: a retrospective case-controlled study Song, Seung Ho Park, Jun Seok Choi, Gyu-Seog Park, Soo Yeon Kim, Hye Jin Lee, Sung-Min Na, Dong-Hee Jeong, Min Hye Ann Surg Treat Res Original Article PURPOSE: Although its efficacy is uncertain, an intraoperative air leak test (ALT) is commonly used to detect mechanical defects following bowel anastomosis. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ALT to detect anastomotic leakage (AL) following rectal excision. METHODS: We reviewed our database for patients with rectal cancers who had undergone curative surgery between January 2012 and January 2018. Patients were grouped according to whether or not an ALT was performed. Propensity score analyses were performed to compare outcomes for groups in a 1:1 case-matched cohort. RESULTS: In total, 1,191 patients underwent rectal excision; 438 (219 in each group) formed the case-matched cohort for analysis. The protective stoma rate was 16.0% and 14.6% in the ALT and the no-ALT groups, respectively (P = 0.791). In the ALT group, 2 patients (0.9%) showed a positive result and were treated with rectal tube drainage, resulting in no leakage. There was no significant difference in postoperative AL rate between the groups (ALT group: 4.6% vs. no-ALT group: 4.1%, P > 0.999). CONCLUSION: ALT played a minimal role in detecting AL following rectal excision. Further studies are warranted to validate our results and clarify whether AL can be prevented with ALT or alternative methods. The Korean Surgical Society 2023-04 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10083345/ /pubmed/37051157 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2023.104.4.214 Text en Copyright © 2023, the Korean Surgical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Song, Seung Ho Park, Jun Seok Choi, Gyu-Seog Park, Soo Yeon Kim, Hye Jin Lee, Sung-Min Na, Dong-Hee Jeong, Min Hye Efficacy of air leak test in detection of anastomotic leaks after rectal excision: a retrospective case-controlled study |
title | Efficacy of air leak test in detection of anastomotic leaks after rectal excision: a retrospective case-controlled study |
title_full | Efficacy of air leak test in detection of anastomotic leaks after rectal excision: a retrospective case-controlled study |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of air leak test in detection of anastomotic leaks after rectal excision: a retrospective case-controlled study |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of air leak test in detection of anastomotic leaks after rectal excision: a retrospective case-controlled study |
title_short | Efficacy of air leak test in detection of anastomotic leaks after rectal excision: a retrospective case-controlled study |
title_sort | efficacy of air leak test in detection of anastomotic leaks after rectal excision: a retrospective case-controlled study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10083345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37051157 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2023.104.4.214 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT songseungho efficacyofairleaktestindetectionofanastomoticleaksafterrectalexcisionaretrospectivecasecontrolledstudy AT parkjunseok efficacyofairleaktestindetectionofanastomoticleaksafterrectalexcisionaretrospectivecasecontrolledstudy AT choigyuseog efficacyofairleaktestindetectionofanastomoticleaksafterrectalexcisionaretrospectivecasecontrolledstudy AT parksooyeon efficacyofairleaktestindetectionofanastomoticleaksafterrectalexcisionaretrospectivecasecontrolledstudy AT kimhyejin efficacyofairleaktestindetectionofanastomoticleaksafterrectalexcisionaretrospectivecasecontrolledstudy AT leesungmin efficacyofairleaktestindetectionofanastomoticleaksafterrectalexcisionaretrospectivecasecontrolledstudy AT nadonghee efficacyofairleaktestindetectionofanastomoticleaksafterrectalexcisionaretrospectivecasecontrolledstudy AT jeongminhye efficacyofairleaktestindetectionofanastomoticleaksafterrectalexcisionaretrospectivecasecontrolledstudy |