Cargando…

Efficacy of air leak test in detection of anastomotic leaks after rectal excision: a retrospective case-controlled study

PURPOSE: Although its efficacy is uncertain, an intraoperative air leak test (ALT) is commonly used to detect mechanical defects following bowel anastomosis. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ALT to detect anastomotic leakage (AL) following rectal excision. METHODS: We reviewed our databa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Seung Ho, Park, Jun Seok, Choi, Gyu-Seog, Park, Soo Yeon, Kim, Hye Jin, Lee, Sung-Min, Na, Dong-Hee, Jeong, Min Hye
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Surgical Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10083345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37051157
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2023.104.4.214
_version_ 1785021489404182528
author Song, Seung Ho
Park, Jun Seok
Choi, Gyu-Seog
Park, Soo Yeon
Kim, Hye Jin
Lee, Sung-Min
Na, Dong-Hee
Jeong, Min Hye
author_facet Song, Seung Ho
Park, Jun Seok
Choi, Gyu-Seog
Park, Soo Yeon
Kim, Hye Jin
Lee, Sung-Min
Na, Dong-Hee
Jeong, Min Hye
author_sort Song, Seung Ho
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Although its efficacy is uncertain, an intraoperative air leak test (ALT) is commonly used to detect mechanical defects following bowel anastomosis. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ALT to detect anastomotic leakage (AL) following rectal excision. METHODS: We reviewed our database for patients with rectal cancers who had undergone curative surgery between January 2012 and January 2018. Patients were grouped according to whether or not an ALT was performed. Propensity score analyses were performed to compare outcomes for groups in a 1:1 case-matched cohort. RESULTS: In total, 1,191 patients underwent rectal excision; 438 (219 in each group) formed the case-matched cohort for analysis. The protective stoma rate was 16.0% and 14.6% in the ALT and the no-ALT groups, respectively (P = 0.791). In the ALT group, 2 patients (0.9%) showed a positive result and were treated with rectal tube drainage, resulting in no leakage. There was no significant difference in postoperative AL rate between the groups (ALT group: 4.6% vs. no-ALT group: 4.1%, P > 0.999). CONCLUSION: ALT played a minimal role in detecting AL following rectal excision. Further studies are warranted to validate our results and clarify whether AL can be prevented with ALT or alternative methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10083345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Korean Surgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100833452023-04-11 Efficacy of air leak test in detection of anastomotic leaks after rectal excision: a retrospective case-controlled study Song, Seung Ho Park, Jun Seok Choi, Gyu-Seog Park, Soo Yeon Kim, Hye Jin Lee, Sung-Min Na, Dong-Hee Jeong, Min Hye Ann Surg Treat Res Original Article PURPOSE: Although its efficacy is uncertain, an intraoperative air leak test (ALT) is commonly used to detect mechanical defects following bowel anastomosis. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ALT to detect anastomotic leakage (AL) following rectal excision. METHODS: We reviewed our database for patients with rectal cancers who had undergone curative surgery between January 2012 and January 2018. Patients were grouped according to whether or not an ALT was performed. Propensity score analyses were performed to compare outcomes for groups in a 1:1 case-matched cohort. RESULTS: In total, 1,191 patients underwent rectal excision; 438 (219 in each group) formed the case-matched cohort for analysis. The protective stoma rate was 16.0% and 14.6% in the ALT and the no-ALT groups, respectively (P = 0.791). In the ALT group, 2 patients (0.9%) showed a positive result and were treated with rectal tube drainage, resulting in no leakage. There was no significant difference in postoperative AL rate between the groups (ALT group: 4.6% vs. no-ALT group: 4.1%, P > 0.999). CONCLUSION: ALT played a minimal role in detecting AL following rectal excision. Further studies are warranted to validate our results and clarify whether AL can be prevented with ALT or alternative methods. The Korean Surgical Society 2023-04 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10083345/ /pubmed/37051157 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2023.104.4.214 Text en Copyright © 2023, the Korean Surgical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Song, Seung Ho
Park, Jun Seok
Choi, Gyu-Seog
Park, Soo Yeon
Kim, Hye Jin
Lee, Sung-Min
Na, Dong-Hee
Jeong, Min Hye
Efficacy of air leak test in detection of anastomotic leaks after rectal excision: a retrospective case-controlled study
title Efficacy of air leak test in detection of anastomotic leaks after rectal excision: a retrospective case-controlled study
title_full Efficacy of air leak test in detection of anastomotic leaks after rectal excision: a retrospective case-controlled study
title_fullStr Efficacy of air leak test in detection of anastomotic leaks after rectal excision: a retrospective case-controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of air leak test in detection of anastomotic leaks after rectal excision: a retrospective case-controlled study
title_short Efficacy of air leak test in detection of anastomotic leaks after rectal excision: a retrospective case-controlled study
title_sort efficacy of air leak test in detection of anastomotic leaks after rectal excision: a retrospective case-controlled study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10083345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37051157
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2023.104.4.214
work_keys_str_mv AT songseungho efficacyofairleaktestindetectionofanastomoticleaksafterrectalexcisionaretrospectivecasecontrolledstudy
AT parkjunseok efficacyofairleaktestindetectionofanastomoticleaksafterrectalexcisionaretrospectivecasecontrolledstudy
AT choigyuseog efficacyofairleaktestindetectionofanastomoticleaksafterrectalexcisionaretrospectivecasecontrolledstudy
AT parksooyeon efficacyofairleaktestindetectionofanastomoticleaksafterrectalexcisionaretrospectivecasecontrolledstudy
AT kimhyejin efficacyofairleaktestindetectionofanastomoticleaksafterrectalexcisionaretrospectivecasecontrolledstudy
AT leesungmin efficacyofairleaktestindetectionofanastomoticleaksafterrectalexcisionaretrospectivecasecontrolledstudy
AT nadonghee efficacyofairleaktestindetectionofanastomoticleaksafterrectalexcisionaretrospectivecasecontrolledstudy
AT jeongminhye efficacyofairleaktestindetectionofanastomoticleaksafterrectalexcisionaretrospectivecasecontrolledstudy