Cargando…
Development and validation of a unifying pre-treatment decision tool for intracranial and extracranial metastasis-directed radiotherapy
BACKGROUND: Though metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) has the potential to improve overall survival (OS), appropriate patient selection remains challenging. We aimed to develop a model predictive of OS to refine patient selection for clinical trials and MDT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assembled a multi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10083422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37051531 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1095170 |
_version_ | 1785021508298473472 |
---|---|
author | Kowalchuk, Roman Mullikin, Trey C. Breen, William Gits, Hunter C. Florez, Marcus De, Brian Harmsen, William S. Rose, Peter Sean Siontis, Brittany L. Costello, Brian A. Morris, Jonathan M. Lucido, John J. Olivier, Kenneth R. Stish, Brad Laack, Nadia N. Park, Sean Owen, Dawn Ghia, Amol J. Brown, Paul D. Merrell, Kenneth Wing |
author_facet | Kowalchuk, Roman Mullikin, Trey C. Breen, William Gits, Hunter C. Florez, Marcus De, Brian Harmsen, William S. Rose, Peter Sean Siontis, Brittany L. Costello, Brian A. Morris, Jonathan M. Lucido, John J. Olivier, Kenneth R. Stish, Brad Laack, Nadia N. Park, Sean Owen, Dawn Ghia, Amol J. Brown, Paul D. Merrell, Kenneth Wing |
author_sort | Kowalchuk, Roman |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Though metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) has the potential to improve overall survival (OS), appropriate patient selection remains challenging. We aimed to develop a model predictive of OS to refine patient selection for clinical trials and MDT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assembled a multi-institutional cohort of patients treated with MDT (stereotactic body radiation therapy, radiosurgery, and whole brain radiation therapy). Candidate variables for recursive partitioning analysis were selected per prior studies: ECOG performance status, time from primary diagnosis, number of additional non-target organ systems involved (NOS), and intracranial metastases. RESULTS: A database of 1,362 patients was assembled with 424 intracranial, 352 lung, and 607 spinal treatments (n=1,383). Treatments were split into training (TC) (70%, n=968) and internal validation (IVC) (30%, n=415) cohorts. The TC had median ECOG of 0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0-1), NOS of 1 (IQR: 0-1), and OS of 18 months (IQR: 7-35). The resulting model components and weights were: ECOG = 0, 1, and > 1 (0, 1, and 2); 0, 1, and > 1 NOS (0, 1, and 2); and intracranial target (2), with lower scores indicating more favorable OS. The model demonstrated high concordance in the TC (0.72) and IVC (0.72). The score also demonstrated high concordance for each target site (spine, brain, and lung). CONCLUSION: This pre-treatment decision tool represents a unifying model for both intracranial and extracranial disease and identifies patients with the longest survival after MDT who may benefit most from aggressive local therapy. Carefully selected patients may benefit from MDT even in the presence of intracranial disease, and this model may help guide patient selection for MDT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10083422 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100834222023-04-11 Development and validation of a unifying pre-treatment decision tool for intracranial and extracranial metastasis-directed radiotherapy Kowalchuk, Roman Mullikin, Trey C. Breen, William Gits, Hunter C. Florez, Marcus De, Brian Harmsen, William S. Rose, Peter Sean Siontis, Brittany L. Costello, Brian A. Morris, Jonathan M. Lucido, John J. Olivier, Kenneth R. Stish, Brad Laack, Nadia N. Park, Sean Owen, Dawn Ghia, Amol J. Brown, Paul D. Merrell, Kenneth Wing Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Though metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) has the potential to improve overall survival (OS), appropriate patient selection remains challenging. We aimed to develop a model predictive of OS to refine patient selection for clinical trials and MDT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assembled a multi-institutional cohort of patients treated with MDT (stereotactic body radiation therapy, radiosurgery, and whole brain radiation therapy). Candidate variables for recursive partitioning analysis were selected per prior studies: ECOG performance status, time from primary diagnosis, number of additional non-target organ systems involved (NOS), and intracranial metastases. RESULTS: A database of 1,362 patients was assembled with 424 intracranial, 352 lung, and 607 spinal treatments (n=1,383). Treatments were split into training (TC) (70%, n=968) and internal validation (IVC) (30%, n=415) cohorts. The TC had median ECOG of 0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0-1), NOS of 1 (IQR: 0-1), and OS of 18 months (IQR: 7-35). The resulting model components and weights were: ECOG = 0, 1, and > 1 (0, 1, and 2); 0, 1, and > 1 NOS (0, 1, and 2); and intracranial target (2), with lower scores indicating more favorable OS. The model demonstrated high concordance in the TC (0.72) and IVC (0.72). The score also demonstrated high concordance for each target site (spine, brain, and lung). CONCLUSION: This pre-treatment decision tool represents a unifying model for both intracranial and extracranial disease and identifies patients with the longest survival after MDT who may benefit most from aggressive local therapy. Carefully selected patients may benefit from MDT even in the presence of intracranial disease, and this model may help guide patient selection for MDT. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10083422/ /pubmed/37051531 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1095170 Text en Copyright © 2023 Kowalchuk, Mullikin, Breen, Gits, Florez, De, Harmsen, Rose, Siontis, Costello, Morris, Lucido, Olivier, Stish, Laack, Park, Owen, Ghia, Brown and Merrell https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Kowalchuk, Roman Mullikin, Trey C. Breen, William Gits, Hunter C. Florez, Marcus De, Brian Harmsen, William S. Rose, Peter Sean Siontis, Brittany L. Costello, Brian A. Morris, Jonathan M. Lucido, John J. Olivier, Kenneth R. Stish, Brad Laack, Nadia N. Park, Sean Owen, Dawn Ghia, Amol J. Brown, Paul D. Merrell, Kenneth Wing Development and validation of a unifying pre-treatment decision tool for intracranial and extracranial metastasis-directed radiotherapy |
title | Development and validation of a unifying pre-treatment decision tool for intracranial and extracranial metastasis-directed radiotherapy |
title_full | Development and validation of a unifying pre-treatment decision tool for intracranial and extracranial metastasis-directed radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of a unifying pre-treatment decision tool for intracranial and extracranial metastasis-directed radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of a unifying pre-treatment decision tool for intracranial and extracranial metastasis-directed radiotherapy |
title_short | Development and validation of a unifying pre-treatment decision tool for intracranial and extracranial metastasis-directed radiotherapy |
title_sort | development and validation of a unifying pre-treatment decision tool for intracranial and extracranial metastasis-directed radiotherapy |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10083422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37051531 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1095170 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kowalchukroman developmentandvalidationofaunifyingpretreatmentdecisiontoolforintracranialandextracranialmetastasisdirectedradiotherapy AT mullikintreyc developmentandvalidationofaunifyingpretreatmentdecisiontoolforintracranialandextracranialmetastasisdirectedradiotherapy AT breenwilliam developmentandvalidationofaunifyingpretreatmentdecisiontoolforintracranialandextracranialmetastasisdirectedradiotherapy AT gitshunterc developmentandvalidationofaunifyingpretreatmentdecisiontoolforintracranialandextracranialmetastasisdirectedradiotherapy AT florezmarcus developmentandvalidationofaunifyingpretreatmentdecisiontoolforintracranialandextracranialmetastasisdirectedradiotherapy AT debrian developmentandvalidationofaunifyingpretreatmentdecisiontoolforintracranialandextracranialmetastasisdirectedradiotherapy AT harmsenwilliams developmentandvalidationofaunifyingpretreatmentdecisiontoolforintracranialandextracranialmetastasisdirectedradiotherapy AT rosepetersean developmentandvalidationofaunifyingpretreatmentdecisiontoolforintracranialandextracranialmetastasisdirectedradiotherapy AT siontisbrittanyl developmentandvalidationofaunifyingpretreatmentdecisiontoolforintracranialandextracranialmetastasisdirectedradiotherapy AT costellobriana developmentandvalidationofaunifyingpretreatmentdecisiontoolforintracranialandextracranialmetastasisdirectedradiotherapy AT morrisjonathanm developmentandvalidationofaunifyingpretreatmentdecisiontoolforintracranialandextracranialmetastasisdirectedradiotherapy AT lucidojohnj developmentandvalidationofaunifyingpretreatmentdecisiontoolforintracranialandextracranialmetastasisdirectedradiotherapy AT olivierkennethr developmentandvalidationofaunifyingpretreatmentdecisiontoolforintracranialandextracranialmetastasisdirectedradiotherapy AT stishbrad developmentandvalidationofaunifyingpretreatmentdecisiontoolforintracranialandextracranialmetastasisdirectedradiotherapy AT laacknadian developmentandvalidationofaunifyingpretreatmentdecisiontoolforintracranialandextracranialmetastasisdirectedradiotherapy AT parksean developmentandvalidationofaunifyingpretreatmentdecisiontoolforintracranialandextracranialmetastasisdirectedradiotherapy AT owendawn developmentandvalidationofaunifyingpretreatmentdecisiontoolforintracranialandextracranialmetastasisdirectedradiotherapy AT ghiaamolj developmentandvalidationofaunifyingpretreatmentdecisiontoolforintracranialandextracranialmetastasisdirectedradiotherapy AT brownpauld developmentandvalidationofaunifyingpretreatmentdecisiontoolforintracranialandextracranialmetastasisdirectedradiotherapy AT merrellkennethwing developmentandvalidationofaunifyingpretreatmentdecisiontoolforintracranialandextracranialmetastasisdirectedradiotherapy |