Cargando…

Revision of the Advanced Cancer Patients’ Distress Scale (ACPDS): a mixed-methods study among palliative patients and healthcare professionals in Germany

OBJECTIVES: To revise the 37-item Advanced Cancer Patients’ Distress Scale (ACPDS) regarding its content, comprehensibility, applicability, and relevance by healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients in order to enhance an existing instrument that is appropriate for the needs of patients with adva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Züger, Andrea, Fischbeck, Sabine, Weber, Martin, Mai, Sandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10083778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37015787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066998
_version_ 1785021596192210944
author Züger, Andrea
Fischbeck, Sabine
Weber, Martin
Mai, Sandra
author_facet Züger, Andrea
Fischbeck, Sabine
Weber, Martin
Mai, Sandra
author_sort Züger, Andrea
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To revise the 37-item Advanced Cancer Patients’ Distress Scale (ACPDS) regarding its content, comprehensibility, applicability, and relevance by healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients in order to enhance an existing instrument that is appropriate for the needs of patients with advanced cancer admitted to palliative care. DESIGN: A preliminary revision of items regarding psychometric indices and relevance to initially shorten the scale, complemented by cognitive interviews with patients combining think-aloud and verbal-probe techniques and an HCP focus group on the detected remaining items. Interviews and the focus group were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using MAXQDA. SETTING: The study took place at a German palliative care unit. PARTICIPANTS: 10 patients were interviewed (50% female) and 6 HCPs (3 physicians, 2 nurses and 1 psychologist) participated in the focus group. OUTCOME MEASURES: Comprehensibility, applicability, and relevance of the ACPDS were evaluated. RESULTS: Based on the psychometric revision, a reduced number of 17 items was discussed by the HCP focus group and within cognitive interviews with patients. For the rest of the analysis of the HCP focus group and the patient interview data, the introduction of the ACPDS was simplified and adapted to everyday language. As recommended by HCPs and patients, the example question was replaced. Nine items were reworded to boost clarity, openness, redundancy and mitigation. Three items were eliminated, and another three items were added. CONCLUSION: With this revised 17-item version of the ACPDS, we constructed an instrument that seems to be appropriate for the needs of patients with advanced cancer in a palliative care setting. In the next step, the shortened scale will be tested on psychometric data and validated by a large sample of inpatients on palliative care suffering from advanced cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS ID: DRKS00022425.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10083778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100837782023-04-11 Revision of the Advanced Cancer Patients’ Distress Scale (ACPDS): a mixed-methods study among palliative patients and healthcare professionals in Germany Züger, Andrea Fischbeck, Sabine Weber, Martin Mai, Sandra BMJ Open Palliative Care OBJECTIVES: To revise the 37-item Advanced Cancer Patients’ Distress Scale (ACPDS) regarding its content, comprehensibility, applicability, and relevance by healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients in order to enhance an existing instrument that is appropriate for the needs of patients with advanced cancer admitted to palliative care. DESIGN: A preliminary revision of items regarding psychometric indices and relevance to initially shorten the scale, complemented by cognitive interviews with patients combining think-aloud and verbal-probe techniques and an HCP focus group on the detected remaining items. Interviews and the focus group were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using MAXQDA. SETTING: The study took place at a German palliative care unit. PARTICIPANTS: 10 patients were interviewed (50% female) and 6 HCPs (3 physicians, 2 nurses and 1 psychologist) participated in the focus group. OUTCOME MEASURES: Comprehensibility, applicability, and relevance of the ACPDS were evaluated. RESULTS: Based on the psychometric revision, a reduced number of 17 items was discussed by the HCP focus group and within cognitive interviews with patients. For the rest of the analysis of the HCP focus group and the patient interview data, the introduction of the ACPDS was simplified and adapted to everyday language. As recommended by HCPs and patients, the example question was replaced. Nine items were reworded to boost clarity, openness, redundancy and mitigation. Three items were eliminated, and another three items were added. CONCLUSION: With this revised 17-item version of the ACPDS, we constructed an instrument that seems to be appropriate for the needs of patients with advanced cancer in a palliative care setting. In the next step, the shortened scale will be tested on psychometric data and validated by a large sample of inpatients on palliative care suffering from advanced cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS ID: DRKS00022425. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10083778/ /pubmed/37015787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066998 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Palliative Care
Züger, Andrea
Fischbeck, Sabine
Weber, Martin
Mai, Sandra
Revision of the Advanced Cancer Patients’ Distress Scale (ACPDS): a mixed-methods study among palliative patients and healthcare professionals in Germany
title Revision of the Advanced Cancer Patients’ Distress Scale (ACPDS): a mixed-methods study among palliative patients and healthcare professionals in Germany
title_full Revision of the Advanced Cancer Patients’ Distress Scale (ACPDS): a mixed-methods study among palliative patients and healthcare professionals in Germany
title_fullStr Revision of the Advanced Cancer Patients’ Distress Scale (ACPDS): a mixed-methods study among palliative patients and healthcare professionals in Germany
title_full_unstemmed Revision of the Advanced Cancer Patients’ Distress Scale (ACPDS): a mixed-methods study among palliative patients and healthcare professionals in Germany
title_short Revision of the Advanced Cancer Patients’ Distress Scale (ACPDS): a mixed-methods study among palliative patients and healthcare professionals in Germany
title_sort revision of the advanced cancer patients’ distress scale (acpds): a mixed-methods study among palliative patients and healthcare professionals in germany
topic Palliative Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10083778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37015787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066998
work_keys_str_mv AT zugerandrea revisionoftheadvancedcancerpatientsdistressscaleacpdsamixedmethodsstudyamongpalliativepatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsingermany
AT fischbecksabine revisionoftheadvancedcancerpatientsdistressscaleacpdsamixedmethodsstudyamongpalliativepatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsingermany
AT webermartin revisionoftheadvancedcancerpatientsdistressscaleacpdsamixedmethodsstudyamongpalliativepatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsingermany
AT maisandra revisionoftheadvancedcancerpatientsdistressscaleacpdsamixedmethodsstudyamongpalliativepatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsingermany