Cargando…

Flexibly funding WHO? An analysis of its donors’ voluntary contributions

INTRODUCTION: Since the 1970s, voluntary contributions have become an increasingly important component of WHO’s budget. As voluntary contributions tend to be earmarked for donor-specified programmes and projects, there are concerns that this trend has diverted focus away from WHO’s strategic priorit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iwunna, Obichukwu, Kennedy, Jonathan, Harmer, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10083790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37024117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011232
_version_ 1785021598543118336
author Iwunna, Obichukwu
Kennedy, Jonathan
Harmer, Andrew
author_facet Iwunna, Obichukwu
Kennedy, Jonathan
Harmer, Andrew
author_sort Iwunna, Obichukwu
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Since the 1970s, voluntary contributions have become an increasingly important component of WHO’s budget. As voluntary contributions tend to be earmarked for donor-specified programmes and projects, there are concerns that this trend has diverted focus away from WHO’s strategic priorities, made coordination and attaining coherence more difficult, undermined WHO’s democratic structures and given undue power to a handful of wealthy donors. In the past few years, the WHO Secretariat has pushed for donors to increase the amount of flexible funding they provide. METHODS: This paper aims to add to the literature on WHO financing by constructing and analysing a dataset based on figures extracted from WHO documents for the period 2010–21. It aims to answer two questions: who funds WHO and how flexible is that funding? RESULTS: Our analysis demonstrates that in the last decade voluntary contributions have steadily increased as a proportion of WHO’s budget, from 75% at the start of the period to 88% at the end. High-income countries and donors based in high-income countries provided 90% of voluntary contributions in 2020. Surprisingly, the share of voluntary contributions provided by upper middle-income countries was consistently less than the share by lower middle-income countries. Furthermore, in terms of their share of voluntary contributions, we found that upper middle-income countries contributed the least proportion of their gross national income to WHO. CONCLUSION: We conclude that WHO remains constrained by the conditions attached to the vast majority of funding that it receives from its donors. Further work on how to flexibly fund WHO is required. We recommend that the Agile Member States Task Group on Strengthening WHO’s Budgetary, Programmatic and Financing Governance continues the work of the Working Group on Sustainable Financing by focusing on the incentives that determine donor support for specified and flexible voluntary contributions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10083790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100837902023-04-11 Flexibly funding WHO? An analysis of its donors’ voluntary contributions Iwunna, Obichukwu Kennedy, Jonathan Harmer, Andrew BMJ Glob Health Original Research INTRODUCTION: Since the 1970s, voluntary contributions have become an increasingly important component of WHO’s budget. As voluntary contributions tend to be earmarked for donor-specified programmes and projects, there are concerns that this trend has diverted focus away from WHO’s strategic priorities, made coordination and attaining coherence more difficult, undermined WHO’s democratic structures and given undue power to a handful of wealthy donors. In the past few years, the WHO Secretariat has pushed for donors to increase the amount of flexible funding they provide. METHODS: This paper aims to add to the literature on WHO financing by constructing and analysing a dataset based on figures extracted from WHO documents for the period 2010–21. It aims to answer two questions: who funds WHO and how flexible is that funding? RESULTS: Our analysis demonstrates that in the last decade voluntary contributions have steadily increased as a proportion of WHO’s budget, from 75% at the start of the period to 88% at the end. High-income countries and donors based in high-income countries provided 90% of voluntary contributions in 2020. Surprisingly, the share of voluntary contributions provided by upper middle-income countries was consistently less than the share by lower middle-income countries. Furthermore, in terms of their share of voluntary contributions, we found that upper middle-income countries contributed the least proportion of their gross national income to WHO. CONCLUSION: We conclude that WHO remains constrained by the conditions attached to the vast majority of funding that it receives from its donors. Further work on how to flexibly fund WHO is required. We recommend that the Agile Member States Task Group on Strengthening WHO’s Budgetary, Programmatic and Financing Governance continues the work of the Working Group on Sustainable Financing by focusing on the incentives that determine donor support for specified and flexible voluntary contributions. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10083790/ /pubmed/37024117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011232 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Iwunna, Obichukwu
Kennedy, Jonathan
Harmer, Andrew
Flexibly funding WHO? An analysis of its donors’ voluntary contributions
title Flexibly funding WHO? An analysis of its donors’ voluntary contributions
title_full Flexibly funding WHO? An analysis of its donors’ voluntary contributions
title_fullStr Flexibly funding WHO? An analysis of its donors’ voluntary contributions
title_full_unstemmed Flexibly funding WHO? An analysis of its donors’ voluntary contributions
title_short Flexibly funding WHO? An analysis of its donors’ voluntary contributions
title_sort flexibly funding who? an analysis of its donors’ voluntary contributions
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10083790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37024117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011232
work_keys_str_mv AT iwunnaobichukwu flexiblyfundingwhoananalysisofitsdonorsvoluntarycontributions
AT kennedyjonathan flexiblyfundingwhoananalysisofitsdonorsvoluntarycontributions
AT harmerandrew flexiblyfundingwhoananalysisofitsdonorsvoluntarycontributions