Cargando…
Flexibly funding WHO? An analysis of its donors’ voluntary contributions
INTRODUCTION: Since the 1970s, voluntary contributions have become an increasingly important component of WHO’s budget. As voluntary contributions tend to be earmarked for donor-specified programmes and projects, there are concerns that this trend has diverted focus away from WHO’s strategic priorit...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10083790/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37024117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011232 |
_version_ | 1785021598543118336 |
---|---|
author | Iwunna, Obichukwu Kennedy, Jonathan Harmer, Andrew |
author_facet | Iwunna, Obichukwu Kennedy, Jonathan Harmer, Andrew |
author_sort | Iwunna, Obichukwu |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Since the 1970s, voluntary contributions have become an increasingly important component of WHO’s budget. As voluntary contributions tend to be earmarked for donor-specified programmes and projects, there are concerns that this trend has diverted focus away from WHO’s strategic priorities, made coordination and attaining coherence more difficult, undermined WHO’s democratic structures and given undue power to a handful of wealthy donors. In the past few years, the WHO Secretariat has pushed for donors to increase the amount of flexible funding they provide. METHODS: This paper aims to add to the literature on WHO financing by constructing and analysing a dataset based on figures extracted from WHO documents for the period 2010–21. It aims to answer two questions: who funds WHO and how flexible is that funding? RESULTS: Our analysis demonstrates that in the last decade voluntary contributions have steadily increased as a proportion of WHO’s budget, from 75% at the start of the period to 88% at the end. High-income countries and donors based in high-income countries provided 90% of voluntary contributions in 2020. Surprisingly, the share of voluntary contributions provided by upper middle-income countries was consistently less than the share by lower middle-income countries. Furthermore, in terms of their share of voluntary contributions, we found that upper middle-income countries contributed the least proportion of their gross national income to WHO. CONCLUSION: We conclude that WHO remains constrained by the conditions attached to the vast majority of funding that it receives from its donors. Further work on how to flexibly fund WHO is required. We recommend that the Agile Member States Task Group on Strengthening WHO’s Budgetary, Programmatic and Financing Governance continues the work of the Working Group on Sustainable Financing by focusing on the incentives that determine donor support for specified and flexible voluntary contributions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10083790 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100837902023-04-11 Flexibly funding WHO? An analysis of its donors’ voluntary contributions Iwunna, Obichukwu Kennedy, Jonathan Harmer, Andrew BMJ Glob Health Original Research INTRODUCTION: Since the 1970s, voluntary contributions have become an increasingly important component of WHO’s budget. As voluntary contributions tend to be earmarked for donor-specified programmes and projects, there are concerns that this trend has diverted focus away from WHO’s strategic priorities, made coordination and attaining coherence more difficult, undermined WHO’s democratic structures and given undue power to a handful of wealthy donors. In the past few years, the WHO Secretariat has pushed for donors to increase the amount of flexible funding they provide. METHODS: This paper aims to add to the literature on WHO financing by constructing and analysing a dataset based on figures extracted from WHO documents for the period 2010–21. It aims to answer two questions: who funds WHO and how flexible is that funding? RESULTS: Our analysis demonstrates that in the last decade voluntary contributions have steadily increased as a proportion of WHO’s budget, from 75% at the start of the period to 88% at the end. High-income countries and donors based in high-income countries provided 90% of voluntary contributions in 2020. Surprisingly, the share of voluntary contributions provided by upper middle-income countries was consistently less than the share by lower middle-income countries. Furthermore, in terms of their share of voluntary contributions, we found that upper middle-income countries contributed the least proportion of their gross national income to WHO. CONCLUSION: We conclude that WHO remains constrained by the conditions attached to the vast majority of funding that it receives from its donors. Further work on how to flexibly fund WHO is required. We recommend that the Agile Member States Task Group on Strengthening WHO’s Budgetary, Programmatic and Financing Governance continues the work of the Working Group on Sustainable Financing by focusing on the incentives that determine donor support for specified and flexible voluntary contributions. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10083790/ /pubmed/37024117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011232 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Iwunna, Obichukwu Kennedy, Jonathan Harmer, Andrew Flexibly funding WHO? An analysis of its donors’ voluntary contributions |
title | Flexibly funding WHO? An analysis of its donors’ voluntary contributions |
title_full | Flexibly funding WHO? An analysis of its donors’ voluntary contributions |
title_fullStr | Flexibly funding WHO? An analysis of its donors’ voluntary contributions |
title_full_unstemmed | Flexibly funding WHO? An analysis of its donors’ voluntary contributions |
title_short | Flexibly funding WHO? An analysis of its donors’ voluntary contributions |
title_sort | flexibly funding who? an analysis of its donors’ voluntary contributions |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10083790/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37024117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011232 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iwunnaobichukwu flexiblyfundingwhoananalysisofitsdonorsvoluntarycontributions AT kennedyjonathan flexiblyfundingwhoananalysisofitsdonorsvoluntarycontributions AT harmerandrew flexiblyfundingwhoananalysisofitsdonorsvoluntarycontributions |