Cargando…
Comparing biparametric to multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men (PRIME): a prospective, international, multicentre, non-inferiority within-patient, diagnostic yield trial protocol
INTRODUCTION: Prostate MRI is a well-established tool for the diagnostic work-up for men with suspected prostate cancer (PCa). Current recommendations advocate the use of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), which is composed of three sequences: T2-weighted sequence (T2W), diffusion-weighted sequence (DWI)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10083803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37019486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070280 |
_version_ | 1785021601124712448 |
---|---|
author | Asif, Aqua Nathan, Arjun Ng, Alexander Khetrapal, Pramit Chan, Vinson Wai-Shun Giganti, Francesco Allen, Clare Freeman, Alex Punwani, Shonit Lorgelly, Paula Clarke, Caroline S Brew-Graves, Chris Muirhead, Nicola Emberton, Mark Agarwal, Ridhi Takwoingi, Yemisi Deeks, Jonathan J Moore, Caroline M Kasivisvanathan, Veeru |
author_facet | Asif, Aqua Nathan, Arjun Ng, Alexander Khetrapal, Pramit Chan, Vinson Wai-Shun Giganti, Francesco Allen, Clare Freeman, Alex Punwani, Shonit Lorgelly, Paula Clarke, Caroline S Brew-Graves, Chris Muirhead, Nicola Emberton, Mark Agarwal, Ridhi Takwoingi, Yemisi Deeks, Jonathan J Moore, Caroline M Kasivisvanathan, Veeru |
author_sort | Asif, Aqua |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Prostate MRI is a well-established tool for the diagnostic work-up for men with suspected prostate cancer (PCa). Current recommendations advocate the use of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), which is composed of three sequences: T2-weighted sequence (T2W), diffusion-weighted sequence (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequence (DCE). Prior studies suggest that a biparametric MRI (bpMRI) approach, omitting the DCE sequences, may not compromise clinically significant cancer detection, though there are limitations to these studies, and it is not known how this may affect treatment eligibility. A bpMRI approach will reduce scanning time, may be more cost-effective and, at a population level, will allow more men to gain access to an MRI than an mpMRI approach. METHODS: Prostate Imaging Using MRI±Contrast Enhancement (PRIME) is a prospective, international, multicentre, within-patient diagnostic yield trial assessing whether bpMRI is non-inferior to mpMRI in the diagnosis of clinically significant PCa. Patients will undergo the full mpMRI scan. Radiologists will be blinded to the DCE and will initially report the MRI using only the bpMRI (T2W and DWI) sequences. They will then be unblinded to the DCE sequence and will then re-report the MRI using the mpMRI sequences (T2W, DWI and DCE). Men with suspicious lesions on either bpMRI or mpMRI will undergo prostate biopsy. The main inclusion criteria are men with suspected PCa, with a serum PSA of ≤20 ng/mL and without prior prostate biopsy. The primary outcome is the proportion of men with clinically significant PCa detected (Gleason score ≥3+4 or Gleason grade group ≥2). A sample size of at least 500 patients is required. Key secondary outcomes include the proportion of clinically insignificant PCa detected and treatment decision. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the National Research Ethics Committee West Midlands, Nottingham (21/WM/0091). Results of this trial will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications. Participants and relevant patient support groups will be informed about the results of the trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04571840. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10083803 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100838032023-04-11 Comparing biparametric to multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men (PRIME): a prospective, international, multicentre, non-inferiority within-patient, diagnostic yield trial protocol Asif, Aqua Nathan, Arjun Ng, Alexander Khetrapal, Pramit Chan, Vinson Wai-Shun Giganti, Francesco Allen, Clare Freeman, Alex Punwani, Shonit Lorgelly, Paula Clarke, Caroline S Brew-Graves, Chris Muirhead, Nicola Emberton, Mark Agarwal, Ridhi Takwoingi, Yemisi Deeks, Jonathan J Moore, Caroline M Kasivisvanathan, Veeru BMJ Open Urology INTRODUCTION: Prostate MRI is a well-established tool for the diagnostic work-up for men with suspected prostate cancer (PCa). Current recommendations advocate the use of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), which is composed of three sequences: T2-weighted sequence (T2W), diffusion-weighted sequence (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequence (DCE). Prior studies suggest that a biparametric MRI (bpMRI) approach, omitting the DCE sequences, may not compromise clinically significant cancer detection, though there are limitations to these studies, and it is not known how this may affect treatment eligibility. A bpMRI approach will reduce scanning time, may be more cost-effective and, at a population level, will allow more men to gain access to an MRI than an mpMRI approach. METHODS: Prostate Imaging Using MRI±Contrast Enhancement (PRIME) is a prospective, international, multicentre, within-patient diagnostic yield trial assessing whether bpMRI is non-inferior to mpMRI in the diagnosis of clinically significant PCa. Patients will undergo the full mpMRI scan. Radiologists will be blinded to the DCE and will initially report the MRI using only the bpMRI (T2W and DWI) sequences. They will then be unblinded to the DCE sequence and will then re-report the MRI using the mpMRI sequences (T2W, DWI and DCE). Men with suspicious lesions on either bpMRI or mpMRI will undergo prostate biopsy. The main inclusion criteria are men with suspected PCa, with a serum PSA of ≤20 ng/mL and without prior prostate biopsy. The primary outcome is the proportion of men with clinically significant PCa detected (Gleason score ≥3+4 or Gleason grade group ≥2). A sample size of at least 500 patients is required. Key secondary outcomes include the proportion of clinically insignificant PCa detected and treatment decision. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the National Research Ethics Committee West Midlands, Nottingham (21/WM/0091). Results of this trial will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications. Participants and relevant patient support groups will be informed about the results of the trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04571840. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10083803/ /pubmed/37019486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070280 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Urology Asif, Aqua Nathan, Arjun Ng, Alexander Khetrapal, Pramit Chan, Vinson Wai-Shun Giganti, Francesco Allen, Clare Freeman, Alex Punwani, Shonit Lorgelly, Paula Clarke, Caroline S Brew-Graves, Chris Muirhead, Nicola Emberton, Mark Agarwal, Ridhi Takwoingi, Yemisi Deeks, Jonathan J Moore, Caroline M Kasivisvanathan, Veeru Comparing biparametric to multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men (PRIME): a prospective, international, multicentre, non-inferiority within-patient, diagnostic yield trial protocol |
title | Comparing biparametric to multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men (PRIME): a prospective, international, multicentre, non-inferiority within-patient, diagnostic yield trial protocol |
title_full | Comparing biparametric to multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men (PRIME): a prospective, international, multicentre, non-inferiority within-patient, diagnostic yield trial protocol |
title_fullStr | Comparing biparametric to multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men (PRIME): a prospective, international, multicentre, non-inferiority within-patient, diagnostic yield trial protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing biparametric to multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men (PRIME): a prospective, international, multicentre, non-inferiority within-patient, diagnostic yield trial protocol |
title_short | Comparing biparametric to multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men (PRIME): a prospective, international, multicentre, non-inferiority within-patient, diagnostic yield trial protocol |
title_sort | comparing biparametric to multiparametric mri in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men (prime): a prospective, international, multicentre, non-inferiority within-patient, diagnostic yield trial protocol |
topic | Urology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10083803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37019486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070280 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT asifaqua comparingbiparametrictomultiparametricmriinthediagnosisofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivemenprimeaprospectiveinternationalmulticentrenoninferioritywithinpatientdiagnosticyieldtrialprotocol AT nathanarjun comparingbiparametrictomultiparametricmriinthediagnosisofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivemenprimeaprospectiveinternationalmulticentrenoninferioritywithinpatientdiagnosticyieldtrialprotocol AT ngalexander comparingbiparametrictomultiparametricmriinthediagnosisofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivemenprimeaprospectiveinternationalmulticentrenoninferioritywithinpatientdiagnosticyieldtrialprotocol AT khetrapalpramit comparingbiparametrictomultiparametricmriinthediagnosisofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivemenprimeaprospectiveinternationalmulticentrenoninferioritywithinpatientdiagnosticyieldtrialprotocol AT chanvinsonwaishun comparingbiparametrictomultiparametricmriinthediagnosisofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivemenprimeaprospectiveinternationalmulticentrenoninferioritywithinpatientdiagnosticyieldtrialprotocol AT gigantifrancesco comparingbiparametrictomultiparametricmriinthediagnosisofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivemenprimeaprospectiveinternationalmulticentrenoninferioritywithinpatientdiagnosticyieldtrialprotocol AT allenclare comparingbiparametrictomultiparametricmriinthediagnosisofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivemenprimeaprospectiveinternationalmulticentrenoninferioritywithinpatientdiagnosticyieldtrialprotocol AT freemanalex comparingbiparametrictomultiparametricmriinthediagnosisofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivemenprimeaprospectiveinternationalmulticentrenoninferioritywithinpatientdiagnosticyieldtrialprotocol AT punwanishonit comparingbiparametrictomultiparametricmriinthediagnosisofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivemenprimeaprospectiveinternationalmulticentrenoninferioritywithinpatientdiagnosticyieldtrialprotocol AT lorgellypaula comparingbiparametrictomultiparametricmriinthediagnosisofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivemenprimeaprospectiveinternationalmulticentrenoninferioritywithinpatientdiagnosticyieldtrialprotocol AT clarkecarolines comparingbiparametrictomultiparametricmriinthediagnosisofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivemenprimeaprospectiveinternationalmulticentrenoninferioritywithinpatientdiagnosticyieldtrialprotocol AT brewgraveschris comparingbiparametrictomultiparametricmriinthediagnosisofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivemenprimeaprospectiveinternationalmulticentrenoninferioritywithinpatientdiagnosticyieldtrialprotocol AT muirheadnicola comparingbiparametrictomultiparametricmriinthediagnosisofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivemenprimeaprospectiveinternationalmulticentrenoninferioritywithinpatientdiagnosticyieldtrialprotocol AT embertonmark comparingbiparametrictomultiparametricmriinthediagnosisofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivemenprimeaprospectiveinternationalmulticentrenoninferioritywithinpatientdiagnosticyieldtrialprotocol AT agarwalridhi comparingbiparametrictomultiparametricmriinthediagnosisofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivemenprimeaprospectiveinternationalmulticentrenoninferioritywithinpatientdiagnosticyieldtrialprotocol AT takwoingiyemisi comparingbiparametrictomultiparametricmriinthediagnosisofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivemenprimeaprospectiveinternationalmulticentrenoninferioritywithinpatientdiagnosticyieldtrialprotocol AT deeksjonathanj comparingbiparametrictomultiparametricmriinthediagnosisofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivemenprimeaprospectiveinternationalmulticentrenoninferioritywithinpatientdiagnosticyieldtrialprotocol AT moorecarolinem comparingbiparametrictomultiparametricmriinthediagnosisofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivemenprimeaprospectiveinternationalmulticentrenoninferioritywithinpatientdiagnosticyieldtrialprotocol AT kasivisvanathanveeru comparingbiparametrictomultiparametricmriinthediagnosisofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivemenprimeaprospectiveinternationalmulticentrenoninferioritywithinpatientdiagnosticyieldtrialprotocol AT comparingbiparametrictomultiparametricmriinthediagnosisofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivemenprimeaprospectiveinternationalmulticentrenoninferioritywithinpatientdiagnosticyieldtrialprotocol |