Cargando…

Study protocol: evaluation of the 0–5 public health investment in England – a mixed-methods study integrating analyses of national linked administrative data with in-depth case studies

INTRODUCTION: Health visiting is a long-established, nationally implemented programme that works with other services at a local level to improve the health and well-being of children and families. To maximise the impact and efficiency of the health visiting programme, policy-makers and commissioners...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harron, Katie, Cavallaro, Francesca L, Bunting, Catherine, Clery, Amanda, Kendall, Sally, Cassidy, Rebecca, Atkins, Julie, Saloniki, Eirini-Christina, Bedford, Helen, Woodman, Jenny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10083857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37019495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073313
_version_ 1785021612482887680
author Harron, Katie
Cavallaro, Francesca L
Bunting, Catherine
Clery, Amanda
Kendall, Sally
Cassidy, Rebecca
Atkins, Julie
Saloniki, Eirini-Christina
Bedford, Helen
Woodman, Jenny
author_facet Harron, Katie
Cavallaro, Francesca L
Bunting, Catherine
Clery, Amanda
Kendall, Sally
Cassidy, Rebecca
Atkins, Julie
Saloniki, Eirini-Christina
Bedford, Helen
Woodman, Jenny
author_sort Harron, Katie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Health visiting is a long-established, nationally implemented programme that works with other services at a local level to improve the health and well-being of children and families. To maximise the impact and efficiency of the health visiting programme, policy-makers and commissioners need robust evidence on the costs and benefits of different levels and types of health visiting, for different families, in different local contexts. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This mixed-methods study will analyse individual-level health visiting data for 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 linked with longitudinal data from children’s social care, hospitals and schools to estimate the association of number and type of health visiting contacts with a range of children and maternal outcomes. We will also use aggregate local authority data to estimate the association between local models of health visiting and area-level outcomes. Outcomes will include hospitalisations, breast feeding, vaccination, childhood obesity and maternal mental health. Where possible, outcomes will be valued in monetary terms, and we will compare total costs to total benefits of different health visiting service delivery models. Qualitative case studies and extensive stakeholder input will help explain the quantitative analyses and interpret the results in the context of local policy, practice and circumstance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The University College London Research Ethics Committee approved this study (ref 20561/002). Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and findings will be shared and debated with national policy-makers, commissioners and managers of health visiting services, health visitors and parents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10083857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100838572023-04-11 Study protocol: evaluation of the 0–5 public health investment in England – a mixed-methods study integrating analyses of national linked administrative data with in-depth case studies Harron, Katie Cavallaro, Francesca L Bunting, Catherine Clery, Amanda Kendall, Sally Cassidy, Rebecca Atkins, Julie Saloniki, Eirini-Christina Bedford, Helen Woodman, Jenny BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: Health visiting is a long-established, nationally implemented programme that works with other services at a local level to improve the health and well-being of children and families. To maximise the impact and efficiency of the health visiting programme, policy-makers and commissioners need robust evidence on the costs and benefits of different levels and types of health visiting, for different families, in different local contexts. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This mixed-methods study will analyse individual-level health visiting data for 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 linked with longitudinal data from children’s social care, hospitals and schools to estimate the association of number and type of health visiting contacts with a range of children and maternal outcomes. We will also use aggregate local authority data to estimate the association between local models of health visiting and area-level outcomes. Outcomes will include hospitalisations, breast feeding, vaccination, childhood obesity and maternal mental health. Where possible, outcomes will be valued in monetary terms, and we will compare total costs to total benefits of different health visiting service delivery models. Qualitative case studies and extensive stakeholder input will help explain the quantitative analyses and interpret the results in the context of local policy, practice and circumstance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The University College London Research Ethics Committee approved this study (ref 20561/002). Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and findings will be shared and debated with national policy-makers, commissioners and managers of health visiting services, health visitors and parents. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10083857/ /pubmed/37019495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073313 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Harron, Katie
Cavallaro, Francesca L
Bunting, Catherine
Clery, Amanda
Kendall, Sally
Cassidy, Rebecca
Atkins, Julie
Saloniki, Eirini-Christina
Bedford, Helen
Woodman, Jenny
Study protocol: evaluation of the 0–5 public health investment in England – a mixed-methods study integrating analyses of national linked administrative data with in-depth case studies
title Study protocol: evaluation of the 0–5 public health investment in England – a mixed-methods study integrating analyses of national linked administrative data with in-depth case studies
title_full Study protocol: evaluation of the 0–5 public health investment in England – a mixed-methods study integrating analyses of national linked administrative data with in-depth case studies
title_fullStr Study protocol: evaluation of the 0–5 public health investment in England – a mixed-methods study integrating analyses of national linked administrative data with in-depth case studies
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol: evaluation of the 0–5 public health investment in England – a mixed-methods study integrating analyses of national linked administrative data with in-depth case studies
title_short Study protocol: evaluation of the 0–5 public health investment in England – a mixed-methods study integrating analyses of national linked administrative data with in-depth case studies
title_sort study protocol: evaluation of the 0–5 public health investment in england – a mixed-methods study integrating analyses of national linked administrative data with in-depth case studies
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10083857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37019495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073313
work_keys_str_mv AT harronkatie studyprotocolevaluationofthe05publichealthinvestmentinenglandamixedmethodsstudyintegratinganalysesofnationallinkedadministrativedatawithindepthcasestudies
AT cavallarofrancescal studyprotocolevaluationofthe05publichealthinvestmentinenglandamixedmethodsstudyintegratinganalysesofnationallinkedadministrativedatawithindepthcasestudies
AT buntingcatherine studyprotocolevaluationofthe05publichealthinvestmentinenglandamixedmethodsstudyintegratinganalysesofnationallinkedadministrativedatawithindepthcasestudies
AT cleryamanda studyprotocolevaluationofthe05publichealthinvestmentinenglandamixedmethodsstudyintegratinganalysesofnationallinkedadministrativedatawithindepthcasestudies
AT kendallsally studyprotocolevaluationofthe05publichealthinvestmentinenglandamixedmethodsstudyintegratinganalysesofnationallinkedadministrativedatawithindepthcasestudies
AT cassidyrebecca studyprotocolevaluationofthe05publichealthinvestmentinenglandamixedmethodsstudyintegratinganalysesofnationallinkedadministrativedatawithindepthcasestudies
AT atkinsjulie studyprotocolevaluationofthe05publichealthinvestmentinenglandamixedmethodsstudyintegratinganalysesofnationallinkedadministrativedatawithindepthcasestudies
AT salonikieirinichristina studyprotocolevaluationofthe05publichealthinvestmentinenglandamixedmethodsstudyintegratinganalysesofnationallinkedadministrativedatawithindepthcasestudies
AT bedfordhelen studyprotocolevaluationofthe05publichealthinvestmentinenglandamixedmethodsstudyintegratinganalysesofnationallinkedadministrativedatawithindepthcasestudies
AT woodmanjenny studyprotocolevaluationofthe05publichealthinvestmentinenglandamixedmethodsstudyintegratinganalysesofnationallinkedadministrativedatawithindepthcasestudies