Cargando…

Qualitative study on experience of healthcare staff who have undergone a hybrid root cause analysis training programme

BACKGROUND: Root cause analysis (RCA) is a structured investigation methodology aimed at identifying systems factors to prevent recurrence of incidents. To enhance staff’s knowledge and skills, a hybrid RCA training course was conducted in February 2021. Overseas instructors conducted training onlin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwok, Yick-ting, Mah, Alastair P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10083879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37003599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002153
_version_ 1785021617441603584
author Kwok, Yick-ting
Mah, Alastair P
author_facet Kwok, Yick-ting
Mah, Alastair P
author_sort Kwok, Yick-ting
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Root cause analysis (RCA) is a structured investigation methodology aimed at identifying systems factors to prevent recurrence of incidents. To enhance staff’s knowledge and skills, a hybrid RCA training course was conducted in February 2021. Overseas instructors conducted training online and local participants attended the training together physically with onsite facilitator support. This study aimed at understanding the experiences of trainees who have undergone the training, evaluated its effectiveness and identified opportunities to enhance RCA training quality in the future. METHODS: A qualitative study using virtual synchronous focus group interviews was conducted. Purposive sampling was adopted to invite all trainees from the RCA training course to join. A semistructured interview was used to guide the study participants to share their experiences. All groups were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and anonymised for data analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 6 focus groups with 19 participants were held between July and November 2021. Five key themes were identified including: (1) training contents, (2) perceptions of RCA, (3) challenges in RCA, (4) hybrid training and (5) future perspectives. Participants felt the RCA training was useful and broadened their understanding in incident investigation. More in-depth training in interviewing skills, report writing with practical sessions could further enhance their competencies in RCA. Participants accepted the use of hybrid online–offline training well. Most participants would welcome an independent organisation to conduct RCA as findings would be more objective and recommendations more effective. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided an evaluation on the effectiveness of a hybrid RCA training course. Healthcare and training organisations can consider this training mode as it could reduce the cost of training and enhance flexibility in course arrangement while preserving quality and effectiveness. Virtual focus groups to interview participants were found to be convenient as it minimised travelling time and onsite arrangement while maintaining the quality of discussion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10083879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100838792023-04-11 Qualitative study on experience of healthcare staff who have undergone a hybrid root cause analysis training programme Kwok, Yick-ting Mah, Alastair P BMJ Open Qual Original Research BACKGROUND: Root cause analysis (RCA) is a structured investigation methodology aimed at identifying systems factors to prevent recurrence of incidents. To enhance staff’s knowledge and skills, a hybrid RCA training course was conducted in February 2021. Overseas instructors conducted training online and local participants attended the training together physically with onsite facilitator support. This study aimed at understanding the experiences of trainees who have undergone the training, evaluated its effectiveness and identified opportunities to enhance RCA training quality in the future. METHODS: A qualitative study using virtual synchronous focus group interviews was conducted. Purposive sampling was adopted to invite all trainees from the RCA training course to join. A semistructured interview was used to guide the study participants to share their experiences. All groups were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and anonymised for data analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 6 focus groups with 19 participants were held between July and November 2021. Five key themes were identified including: (1) training contents, (2) perceptions of RCA, (3) challenges in RCA, (4) hybrid training and (5) future perspectives. Participants felt the RCA training was useful and broadened their understanding in incident investigation. More in-depth training in interviewing skills, report writing with practical sessions could further enhance their competencies in RCA. Participants accepted the use of hybrid online–offline training well. Most participants would welcome an independent organisation to conduct RCA as findings would be more objective and recommendations more effective. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided an evaluation on the effectiveness of a hybrid RCA training course. Healthcare and training organisations can consider this training mode as it could reduce the cost of training and enhance flexibility in course arrangement while preserving quality and effectiveness. Virtual focus groups to interview participants were found to be convenient as it minimised travelling time and onsite arrangement while maintaining the quality of discussion. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10083879/ /pubmed/37003599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002153 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Kwok, Yick-ting
Mah, Alastair P
Qualitative study on experience of healthcare staff who have undergone a hybrid root cause analysis training programme
title Qualitative study on experience of healthcare staff who have undergone a hybrid root cause analysis training programme
title_full Qualitative study on experience of healthcare staff who have undergone a hybrid root cause analysis training programme
title_fullStr Qualitative study on experience of healthcare staff who have undergone a hybrid root cause analysis training programme
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative study on experience of healthcare staff who have undergone a hybrid root cause analysis training programme
title_short Qualitative study on experience of healthcare staff who have undergone a hybrid root cause analysis training programme
title_sort qualitative study on experience of healthcare staff who have undergone a hybrid root cause analysis training programme
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10083879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37003599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002153
work_keys_str_mv AT kwokyickting qualitativestudyonexperienceofhealthcarestaffwhohaveundergoneahybridrootcauseanalysistrainingprogramme
AT mahalastairp qualitativestudyonexperienceofhealthcarestaffwhohaveundergoneahybridrootcauseanalysistrainingprogramme