Cargando…

A prognostic classification system for uveal melanoma based on a combination of patient age and sex, the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Cancer Genome Atlas models

PURPOSE: To revisit the independent importance of ciliary body involvement (CBI), monosomy 3 (M3), tumour size, histological and clinical factors in uveal melanoma (UM) and to devise a new prognostic classification based on a combination of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the Cance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gill, Viktor T., Sabazade, Shiva, Herrspiegel, Christina, Ewens, Kathryn G., Opalko, Adrianna, Dan, Nicole, Christersdottir, Tinna, Berg Rendahl, Alexander, Shields, Carol L., Seregard, Stefan, Ganguly, Arupa, Stålhammar, Gustav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10083913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35801361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.15210
_version_ 1785021623087136768
author Gill, Viktor T.
Sabazade, Shiva
Herrspiegel, Christina
Ewens, Kathryn G.
Opalko, Adrianna
Dan, Nicole
Christersdottir, Tinna
Berg Rendahl, Alexander
Shields, Carol L.
Seregard, Stefan
Ganguly, Arupa
Stålhammar, Gustav
author_facet Gill, Viktor T.
Sabazade, Shiva
Herrspiegel, Christina
Ewens, Kathryn G.
Opalko, Adrianna
Dan, Nicole
Christersdottir, Tinna
Berg Rendahl, Alexander
Shields, Carol L.
Seregard, Stefan
Ganguly, Arupa
Stålhammar, Gustav
author_sort Gill, Viktor T.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To revisit the independent importance of ciliary body involvement (CBI), monosomy 3 (M3), tumour size, histological and clinical factors in uveal melanoma (UM) and to devise a new prognostic classification based on a combination of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) models. METHODS: Two cohorts with a total of 1796 patients were included. Clinicopathological factors were compared between patients with and without CBI and M3. Development of the prognostic classification was performed in a training cohort and was then tested in two independent validation cohorts. RESULTS: Tumours with CBI were more common in women, had greater apical thickness, greater basal tumour diameter, greater rates of vasculogenic mimicry and greater rates of M3, were more often asymptomatic at diagnosis and had poorer 5‐ and 10‐year globe conservation rates (p < 0.023). In multivariate logistic regression, patient age at diagnosis, tumour diameter and CBI were independent predictors of M3 (p < 0.001). In multivariate Cox regression, male sex, age at diagnosis, tumour diameter, M3 and CBI were independent predictors of metastasis. The proposed prognostic classification combined patient age, sex, CBI, extraocular extension, M3, 8q (optional) and tumour size, and demonstrated greater prognostic acumen than both AJCC 4 T categories and TCGA groups A to D in validation cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Tumour size does not confound the prognostic implication of CBI, M3, male sex and age at diagnosis in UM. These factors were included in a new prognostic classification that outperforms AJCC T category and TCGA groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10083913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100839132023-04-11 A prognostic classification system for uveal melanoma based on a combination of patient age and sex, the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Cancer Genome Atlas models Gill, Viktor T. Sabazade, Shiva Herrspiegel, Christina Ewens, Kathryn G. Opalko, Adrianna Dan, Nicole Christersdottir, Tinna Berg Rendahl, Alexander Shields, Carol L. Seregard, Stefan Ganguly, Arupa Stålhammar, Gustav Acta Ophthalmol Original Articles PURPOSE: To revisit the independent importance of ciliary body involvement (CBI), monosomy 3 (M3), tumour size, histological and clinical factors in uveal melanoma (UM) and to devise a new prognostic classification based on a combination of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) models. METHODS: Two cohorts with a total of 1796 patients were included. Clinicopathological factors were compared between patients with and without CBI and M3. Development of the prognostic classification was performed in a training cohort and was then tested in two independent validation cohorts. RESULTS: Tumours with CBI were more common in women, had greater apical thickness, greater basal tumour diameter, greater rates of vasculogenic mimicry and greater rates of M3, were more often asymptomatic at diagnosis and had poorer 5‐ and 10‐year globe conservation rates (p < 0.023). In multivariate logistic regression, patient age at diagnosis, tumour diameter and CBI were independent predictors of M3 (p < 0.001). In multivariate Cox regression, male sex, age at diagnosis, tumour diameter, M3 and CBI were independent predictors of metastasis. The proposed prognostic classification combined patient age, sex, CBI, extraocular extension, M3, 8q (optional) and tumour size, and demonstrated greater prognostic acumen than both AJCC 4 T categories and TCGA groups A to D in validation cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Tumour size does not confound the prognostic implication of CBI, M3, male sex and age at diagnosis in UM. These factors were included in a new prognostic classification that outperforms AJCC T category and TCGA groups. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-08 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10083913/ /pubmed/35801361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.15210 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Gill, Viktor T.
Sabazade, Shiva
Herrspiegel, Christina
Ewens, Kathryn G.
Opalko, Adrianna
Dan, Nicole
Christersdottir, Tinna
Berg Rendahl, Alexander
Shields, Carol L.
Seregard, Stefan
Ganguly, Arupa
Stålhammar, Gustav
A prognostic classification system for uveal melanoma based on a combination of patient age and sex, the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Cancer Genome Atlas models
title A prognostic classification system for uveal melanoma based on a combination of patient age and sex, the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Cancer Genome Atlas models
title_full A prognostic classification system for uveal melanoma based on a combination of patient age and sex, the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Cancer Genome Atlas models
title_fullStr A prognostic classification system for uveal melanoma based on a combination of patient age and sex, the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Cancer Genome Atlas models
title_full_unstemmed A prognostic classification system for uveal melanoma based on a combination of patient age and sex, the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Cancer Genome Atlas models
title_short A prognostic classification system for uveal melanoma based on a combination of patient age and sex, the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Cancer Genome Atlas models
title_sort prognostic classification system for uveal melanoma based on a combination of patient age and sex, the american joint committee on cancer and the cancer genome atlas models
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10083913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35801361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.15210
work_keys_str_mv AT gillviktort aprognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels
AT sabazadeshiva aprognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels
AT herrspiegelchristina aprognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels
AT ewenskathryng aprognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels
AT opalkoadrianna aprognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels
AT dannicole aprognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels
AT christersdottirtinna aprognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels
AT bergrendahlalexander aprognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels
AT shieldscaroll aprognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels
AT seregardstefan aprognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels
AT gangulyarupa aprognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels
AT stalhammargustav aprognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels
AT gillviktort prognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels
AT sabazadeshiva prognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels
AT herrspiegelchristina prognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels
AT ewenskathryng prognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels
AT opalkoadrianna prognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels
AT dannicole prognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels
AT christersdottirtinna prognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels
AT bergrendahlalexander prognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels
AT shieldscaroll prognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels
AT seregardstefan prognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels
AT gangulyarupa prognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels
AT stalhammargustav prognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels