Cargando…
A prognostic classification system for uveal melanoma based on a combination of patient age and sex, the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Cancer Genome Atlas models
PURPOSE: To revisit the independent importance of ciliary body involvement (CBI), monosomy 3 (M3), tumour size, histological and clinical factors in uveal melanoma (UM) and to devise a new prognostic classification based on a combination of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the Cance...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10083913/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35801361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.15210 |
_version_ | 1785021623087136768 |
---|---|
author | Gill, Viktor T. Sabazade, Shiva Herrspiegel, Christina Ewens, Kathryn G. Opalko, Adrianna Dan, Nicole Christersdottir, Tinna Berg Rendahl, Alexander Shields, Carol L. Seregard, Stefan Ganguly, Arupa Stålhammar, Gustav |
author_facet | Gill, Viktor T. Sabazade, Shiva Herrspiegel, Christina Ewens, Kathryn G. Opalko, Adrianna Dan, Nicole Christersdottir, Tinna Berg Rendahl, Alexander Shields, Carol L. Seregard, Stefan Ganguly, Arupa Stålhammar, Gustav |
author_sort | Gill, Viktor T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To revisit the independent importance of ciliary body involvement (CBI), monosomy 3 (M3), tumour size, histological and clinical factors in uveal melanoma (UM) and to devise a new prognostic classification based on a combination of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) models. METHODS: Two cohorts with a total of 1796 patients were included. Clinicopathological factors were compared between patients with and without CBI and M3. Development of the prognostic classification was performed in a training cohort and was then tested in two independent validation cohorts. RESULTS: Tumours with CBI were more common in women, had greater apical thickness, greater basal tumour diameter, greater rates of vasculogenic mimicry and greater rates of M3, were more often asymptomatic at diagnosis and had poorer 5‐ and 10‐year globe conservation rates (p < 0.023). In multivariate logistic regression, patient age at diagnosis, tumour diameter and CBI were independent predictors of M3 (p < 0.001). In multivariate Cox regression, male sex, age at diagnosis, tumour diameter, M3 and CBI were independent predictors of metastasis. The proposed prognostic classification combined patient age, sex, CBI, extraocular extension, M3, 8q (optional) and tumour size, and demonstrated greater prognostic acumen than both AJCC 4 T categories and TCGA groups A to D in validation cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Tumour size does not confound the prognostic implication of CBI, M3, male sex and age at diagnosis in UM. These factors were included in a new prognostic classification that outperforms AJCC T category and TCGA groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10083913 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100839132023-04-11 A prognostic classification system for uveal melanoma based on a combination of patient age and sex, the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Cancer Genome Atlas models Gill, Viktor T. Sabazade, Shiva Herrspiegel, Christina Ewens, Kathryn G. Opalko, Adrianna Dan, Nicole Christersdottir, Tinna Berg Rendahl, Alexander Shields, Carol L. Seregard, Stefan Ganguly, Arupa Stålhammar, Gustav Acta Ophthalmol Original Articles PURPOSE: To revisit the independent importance of ciliary body involvement (CBI), monosomy 3 (M3), tumour size, histological and clinical factors in uveal melanoma (UM) and to devise a new prognostic classification based on a combination of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) models. METHODS: Two cohorts with a total of 1796 patients were included. Clinicopathological factors were compared between patients with and without CBI and M3. Development of the prognostic classification was performed in a training cohort and was then tested in two independent validation cohorts. RESULTS: Tumours with CBI were more common in women, had greater apical thickness, greater basal tumour diameter, greater rates of vasculogenic mimicry and greater rates of M3, were more often asymptomatic at diagnosis and had poorer 5‐ and 10‐year globe conservation rates (p < 0.023). In multivariate logistic regression, patient age at diagnosis, tumour diameter and CBI were independent predictors of M3 (p < 0.001). In multivariate Cox regression, male sex, age at diagnosis, tumour diameter, M3 and CBI were independent predictors of metastasis. The proposed prognostic classification combined patient age, sex, CBI, extraocular extension, M3, 8q (optional) and tumour size, and demonstrated greater prognostic acumen than both AJCC 4 T categories and TCGA groups A to D in validation cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Tumour size does not confound the prognostic implication of CBI, M3, male sex and age at diagnosis in UM. These factors were included in a new prognostic classification that outperforms AJCC T category and TCGA groups. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-08 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10083913/ /pubmed/35801361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.15210 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Gill, Viktor T. Sabazade, Shiva Herrspiegel, Christina Ewens, Kathryn G. Opalko, Adrianna Dan, Nicole Christersdottir, Tinna Berg Rendahl, Alexander Shields, Carol L. Seregard, Stefan Ganguly, Arupa Stålhammar, Gustav A prognostic classification system for uveal melanoma based on a combination of patient age and sex, the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Cancer Genome Atlas models |
title | A prognostic classification system for uveal melanoma based on a combination of patient age and sex, the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Cancer Genome Atlas models |
title_full | A prognostic classification system for uveal melanoma based on a combination of patient age and sex, the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Cancer Genome Atlas models |
title_fullStr | A prognostic classification system for uveal melanoma based on a combination of patient age and sex, the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Cancer Genome Atlas models |
title_full_unstemmed | A prognostic classification system for uveal melanoma based on a combination of patient age and sex, the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Cancer Genome Atlas models |
title_short | A prognostic classification system for uveal melanoma based on a combination of patient age and sex, the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Cancer Genome Atlas models |
title_sort | prognostic classification system for uveal melanoma based on a combination of patient age and sex, the american joint committee on cancer and the cancer genome atlas models |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10083913/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35801361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.15210 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gillviktort aprognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels AT sabazadeshiva aprognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels AT herrspiegelchristina aprognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels AT ewenskathryng aprognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels AT opalkoadrianna aprognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels AT dannicole aprognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels AT christersdottirtinna aprognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels AT bergrendahlalexander aprognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels AT shieldscaroll aprognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels AT seregardstefan aprognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels AT gangulyarupa aprognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels AT stalhammargustav aprognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels AT gillviktort prognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels AT sabazadeshiva prognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels AT herrspiegelchristina prognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels AT ewenskathryng prognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels AT opalkoadrianna prognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels AT dannicole prognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels AT christersdottirtinna prognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels AT bergrendahlalexander prognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels AT shieldscaroll prognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels AT seregardstefan prognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels AT gangulyarupa prognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels AT stalhammargustav prognosticclassificationsystemforuvealmelanomabasedonacombinationofpatientageandsextheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerandthecancergenomeatlasmodels |