Cargando…

Mental health trajectories after juridical divorce: Does personality matter?

INTRODUCTION: This study investigated whether the Big Five personality dimensions were associated with mental health trajectories and/or intervention effects of a digital divorce intervention from juridical divorce to 12 months following juridical divorce. The study utilized a randomized controlled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hald, Gert Martin, Wimmelmann, Cathrine Lawaetz, Øverup, Camilla S., Cipric, Ana, Sander, Søren, Strizzi, Jenna Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10083938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35656740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12737
_version_ 1785021629033611264
author Hald, Gert Martin
Wimmelmann, Cathrine Lawaetz
Øverup, Camilla S.
Cipric, Ana
Sander, Søren
Strizzi, Jenna Marie
author_facet Hald, Gert Martin
Wimmelmann, Cathrine Lawaetz
Øverup, Camilla S.
Cipric, Ana
Sander, Søren
Strizzi, Jenna Marie
author_sort Hald, Gert Martin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study investigated whether the Big Five personality dimensions were associated with mental health trajectories and/or intervention effects of a digital divorce intervention from juridical divorce to 12 months following juridical divorce. The study utilized a randomized controlled trial study design (N = 676) and measured mental health outcomes (anxiety, depression, somatization, and stress) at study inclusion (i.e., at juridical divorce) and 3‐, 6‐, and 12 months after juridical divorce. Big Five personality dimensions were measured 1 month post study inclusion. RESULTS: The study found that neuroticism is the personality dimension most predictive of post‐divorce mental health outcomes. Specifically, divorcees with higher neuroticism scores indicated worse mental health immediately following divorce, but their symptom levels decreased more rapidly over a 12 months period after juridical divorce compared with lower neuroticism divorcees. It is also notable that their mean scores for the mental health outcomes remained higher at all time points (3, 6, and 12 months post baseline), relative to those lower in neuroticism. CONCLUSION: Findings are discussed in light of divorce‐adjustment‐theory and the stress‐buffering model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10083938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100839382023-04-11 Mental health trajectories after juridical divorce: Does personality matter? Hald, Gert Martin Wimmelmann, Cathrine Lawaetz Øverup, Camilla S. Cipric, Ana Sander, Søren Strizzi, Jenna Marie J Pers Original Articles INTRODUCTION: This study investigated whether the Big Five personality dimensions were associated with mental health trajectories and/or intervention effects of a digital divorce intervention from juridical divorce to 12 months following juridical divorce. The study utilized a randomized controlled trial study design (N = 676) and measured mental health outcomes (anxiety, depression, somatization, and stress) at study inclusion (i.e., at juridical divorce) and 3‐, 6‐, and 12 months after juridical divorce. Big Five personality dimensions were measured 1 month post study inclusion. RESULTS: The study found that neuroticism is the personality dimension most predictive of post‐divorce mental health outcomes. Specifically, divorcees with higher neuroticism scores indicated worse mental health immediately following divorce, but their symptom levels decreased more rapidly over a 12 months period after juridical divorce compared with lower neuroticism divorcees. It is also notable that their mean scores for the mental health outcomes remained higher at all time points (3, 6, and 12 months post baseline), relative to those lower in neuroticism. CONCLUSION: Findings are discussed in light of divorce‐adjustment‐theory and the stress‐buffering model. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-22 2023-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10083938/ /pubmed/35656740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12737 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Personality published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hald, Gert Martin
Wimmelmann, Cathrine Lawaetz
Øverup, Camilla S.
Cipric, Ana
Sander, Søren
Strizzi, Jenna Marie
Mental health trajectories after juridical divorce: Does personality matter?
title Mental health trajectories after juridical divorce: Does personality matter?
title_full Mental health trajectories after juridical divorce: Does personality matter?
title_fullStr Mental health trajectories after juridical divorce: Does personality matter?
title_full_unstemmed Mental health trajectories after juridical divorce: Does personality matter?
title_short Mental health trajectories after juridical divorce: Does personality matter?
title_sort mental health trajectories after juridical divorce: does personality matter?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10083938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35656740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12737
work_keys_str_mv AT haldgertmartin mentalhealthtrajectoriesafterjuridicaldivorcedoespersonalitymatter
AT wimmelmanncathrinelawaetz mentalhealthtrajectoriesafterjuridicaldivorcedoespersonalitymatter
AT øverupcamillas mentalhealthtrajectoriesafterjuridicaldivorcedoespersonalitymatter
AT cipricana mentalhealthtrajectoriesafterjuridicaldivorcedoespersonalitymatter
AT sandersøren mentalhealthtrajectoriesafterjuridicaldivorcedoespersonalitymatter
AT strizzijennamarie mentalhealthtrajectoriesafterjuridicaldivorcedoespersonalitymatter