Cargando…
Neurotherapeutics for ADHD: Do they work?
This paper reflects on the use of neurotherapeutics for attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). ADHD is the most imaged child psychiatric disorder, with over 3 decades of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) research. Findings are relatively homogeneous compared to other psychiatric conditions...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10083951/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35359026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pchj.544 |
_version_ | 1785021631548096512 |
---|---|
author | Rubia, Katya |
author_facet | Rubia, Katya |
author_sort | Rubia, Katya |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper reflects on the use of neurotherapeutics for attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). ADHD is the most imaged child psychiatric disorder, with over 3 decades of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) research. Findings are relatively homogeneous compared to other psychiatric conditions with consistent evidence for differences, albeit small, relative to healthy controls in the structure and function of several frontal, parietotemporal, and striatal brain regions as well as their inter‐regional structural and functional connections. The functional deficits have been targeted with modern neurotherapeutics, including neurofeedback (using most commonly electroencephalography and more recently functional near‐infrared spectroscopy and functional MRI) and non‐invasive brain stimulation (such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, or external trigeminal nerve stimulation). Except for electroencephalography‐neurofeedback, the majority of neurotherapeutic studies have been relatively small, with very heterogenous research protocols and outcome measures and—likely as a consequence—inconsistent findings. Furthermore, most brain stimulation studies have tested effects on cognitive functions rather than clinical symptoms. So far, findings have not been very promising. Future studies require systematic testing of optimal protocols in large samples or homogenous subgroups to understand response prediction that could lead to individualized treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10083951 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100839512023-04-11 Neurotherapeutics for ADHD: Do they work? Rubia, Katya Psych J Opinion Paper This paper reflects on the use of neurotherapeutics for attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). ADHD is the most imaged child psychiatric disorder, with over 3 decades of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) research. Findings are relatively homogeneous compared to other psychiatric conditions with consistent evidence for differences, albeit small, relative to healthy controls in the structure and function of several frontal, parietotemporal, and striatal brain regions as well as their inter‐regional structural and functional connections. The functional deficits have been targeted with modern neurotherapeutics, including neurofeedback (using most commonly electroencephalography and more recently functional near‐infrared spectroscopy and functional MRI) and non‐invasive brain stimulation (such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, or external trigeminal nerve stimulation). Except for electroencephalography‐neurofeedback, the majority of neurotherapeutic studies have been relatively small, with very heterogenous research protocols and outcome measures and—likely as a consequence—inconsistent findings. Furthermore, most brain stimulation studies have tested effects on cognitive functions rather than clinical symptoms. So far, findings have not been very promising. Future studies require systematic testing of optimal protocols in large samples or homogenous subgroups to understand response prediction that could lead to individualized treatment. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-03-31 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10083951/ /pubmed/35359026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pchj.544 Text en © 2022 The Author. PsyCh Journal published by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Opinion Paper Rubia, Katya Neurotherapeutics for ADHD: Do they work? |
title | Neurotherapeutics for ADHD: Do they work? |
title_full | Neurotherapeutics for ADHD: Do they work? |
title_fullStr | Neurotherapeutics for ADHD: Do they work? |
title_full_unstemmed | Neurotherapeutics for ADHD: Do they work? |
title_short | Neurotherapeutics for ADHD: Do they work? |
title_sort | neurotherapeutics for adhd: do they work? |
topic | Opinion Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10083951/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35359026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pchj.544 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rubiakatya neurotherapeuticsforadhddotheywork |