Cargando…

A systematic review of frailty education programs for health care professionals

OBJECTIVES: To identify and examine the reported effectiveness of education programs for health professionals on frailty. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of articles published up to June 2021, examining the evaluation of frailty training or education programs targeting health professional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Warren, Nicola, Gordon, Emily, Pearson, Ella, Siskind, Dan, Hilmer, Sarah N., Etherton‐Beer, Christopher, Hanjani, Leila Shafiee, Young, Adrienne M., Reid, Natasha, Hubbard, Ruth E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35801297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajag.13096
_version_ 1785021645487865856
author Warren, Nicola
Gordon, Emily
Pearson, Ella
Siskind, Dan
Hilmer, Sarah N.
Etherton‐Beer, Christopher
Hanjani, Leila Shafiee
Young, Adrienne M.
Reid, Natasha
Hubbard, Ruth E.
author_facet Warren, Nicola
Gordon, Emily
Pearson, Ella
Siskind, Dan
Hilmer, Sarah N.
Etherton‐Beer, Christopher
Hanjani, Leila Shafiee
Young, Adrienne M.
Reid, Natasha
Hubbard, Ruth E.
author_sort Warren, Nicola
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To identify and examine the reported effectiveness of education programs for health professionals on frailty. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of articles published up to June 2021, examining the evaluation of frailty training or education programs targeting health professionals/students. The participant demographics, program content and structure, effectiveness assessment methodology and outcomes, as well as participant feedback, were recorded with narrative synthesis of results. RESULTS: There were nine programs that have evaluated training of health professionals in frailty. These programs varied with respect to intensity, duration, and delivery modality, and targeted a range of health professionals and students. The programs were well‐received and found to be effective in increasing frailty knowledge and self‐perceived competence in frailty assessment. Common features of successful programs included having multidisciplinary participants, delivering a clinically tailored program and using flexible teaching modalities. Of note, many programs assessed self‐perceived efficacy rather than objective changes in patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing attention on frailty in clinical practice, this systematic review found that there continues to be limited reporting of frailty training programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10084012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100840122023-04-11 A systematic review of frailty education programs for health care professionals Warren, Nicola Gordon, Emily Pearson, Ella Siskind, Dan Hilmer, Sarah N. Etherton‐Beer, Christopher Hanjani, Leila Shafiee Young, Adrienne M. Reid, Natasha Hubbard, Ruth E. Australas J Ageing Review Article OBJECTIVES: To identify and examine the reported effectiveness of education programs for health professionals on frailty. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of articles published up to June 2021, examining the evaluation of frailty training or education programs targeting health professionals/students. The participant demographics, program content and structure, effectiveness assessment methodology and outcomes, as well as participant feedback, were recorded with narrative synthesis of results. RESULTS: There were nine programs that have evaluated training of health professionals in frailty. These programs varied with respect to intensity, duration, and delivery modality, and targeted a range of health professionals and students. The programs were well‐received and found to be effective in increasing frailty knowledge and self‐perceived competence in frailty assessment. Common features of successful programs included having multidisciplinary participants, delivering a clinically tailored program and using flexible teaching modalities. Of note, many programs assessed self‐perceived efficacy rather than objective changes in patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing attention on frailty in clinical practice, this systematic review found that there continues to be limited reporting of frailty training programs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-07 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10084012/ /pubmed/35801297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajag.13096 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Australasian Journal on Ageing published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of AJA Inc’. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review Article
Warren, Nicola
Gordon, Emily
Pearson, Ella
Siskind, Dan
Hilmer, Sarah N.
Etherton‐Beer, Christopher
Hanjani, Leila Shafiee
Young, Adrienne M.
Reid, Natasha
Hubbard, Ruth E.
A systematic review of frailty education programs for health care professionals
title A systematic review of frailty education programs for health care professionals
title_full A systematic review of frailty education programs for health care professionals
title_fullStr A systematic review of frailty education programs for health care professionals
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of frailty education programs for health care professionals
title_short A systematic review of frailty education programs for health care professionals
title_sort systematic review of frailty education programs for health care professionals
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35801297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajag.13096
work_keys_str_mv AT warrennicola asystematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals
AT gordonemily asystematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals
AT pearsonella asystematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals
AT siskinddan asystematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals
AT hilmersarahn asystematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals
AT ethertonbeerchristopher asystematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals
AT hanjanileilashafiee asystematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals
AT youngadriennem asystematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals
AT reidnatasha asystematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals
AT hubbardruthe asystematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals
AT warrennicola systematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals
AT gordonemily systematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals
AT pearsonella systematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals
AT siskinddan systematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals
AT hilmersarahn systematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals
AT ethertonbeerchristopher systematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals
AT hanjanileilashafiee systematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals
AT youngadriennem systematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals
AT reidnatasha systematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals
AT hubbardruthe systematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals