Cargando…
A systematic review of frailty education programs for health care professionals
OBJECTIVES: To identify and examine the reported effectiveness of education programs for health professionals on frailty. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of articles published up to June 2021, examining the evaluation of frailty training or education programs targeting health professional...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35801297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajag.13096 |
_version_ | 1785021645487865856 |
---|---|
author | Warren, Nicola Gordon, Emily Pearson, Ella Siskind, Dan Hilmer, Sarah N. Etherton‐Beer, Christopher Hanjani, Leila Shafiee Young, Adrienne M. Reid, Natasha Hubbard, Ruth E. |
author_facet | Warren, Nicola Gordon, Emily Pearson, Ella Siskind, Dan Hilmer, Sarah N. Etherton‐Beer, Christopher Hanjani, Leila Shafiee Young, Adrienne M. Reid, Natasha Hubbard, Ruth E. |
author_sort | Warren, Nicola |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To identify and examine the reported effectiveness of education programs for health professionals on frailty. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of articles published up to June 2021, examining the evaluation of frailty training or education programs targeting health professionals/students. The participant demographics, program content and structure, effectiveness assessment methodology and outcomes, as well as participant feedback, were recorded with narrative synthesis of results. RESULTS: There were nine programs that have evaluated training of health professionals in frailty. These programs varied with respect to intensity, duration, and delivery modality, and targeted a range of health professionals and students. The programs were well‐received and found to be effective in increasing frailty knowledge and self‐perceived competence in frailty assessment. Common features of successful programs included having multidisciplinary participants, delivering a clinically tailored program and using flexible teaching modalities. Of note, many programs assessed self‐perceived efficacy rather than objective changes in patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing attention on frailty in clinical practice, this systematic review found that there continues to be limited reporting of frailty training programs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10084012 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100840122023-04-11 A systematic review of frailty education programs for health care professionals Warren, Nicola Gordon, Emily Pearson, Ella Siskind, Dan Hilmer, Sarah N. Etherton‐Beer, Christopher Hanjani, Leila Shafiee Young, Adrienne M. Reid, Natasha Hubbard, Ruth E. Australas J Ageing Review Article OBJECTIVES: To identify and examine the reported effectiveness of education programs for health professionals on frailty. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of articles published up to June 2021, examining the evaluation of frailty training or education programs targeting health professionals/students. The participant demographics, program content and structure, effectiveness assessment methodology and outcomes, as well as participant feedback, were recorded with narrative synthesis of results. RESULTS: There were nine programs that have evaluated training of health professionals in frailty. These programs varied with respect to intensity, duration, and delivery modality, and targeted a range of health professionals and students. The programs were well‐received and found to be effective in increasing frailty knowledge and self‐perceived competence in frailty assessment. Common features of successful programs included having multidisciplinary participants, delivering a clinically tailored program and using flexible teaching modalities. Of note, many programs assessed self‐perceived efficacy rather than objective changes in patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing attention on frailty in clinical practice, this systematic review found that there continues to be limited reporting of frailty training programs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-07 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10084012/ /pubmed/35801297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajag.13096 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Australasian Journal on Ageing published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of AJA Inc’. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Warren, Nicola Gordon, Emily Pearson, Ella Siskind, Dan Hilmer, Sarah N. Etherton‐Beer, Christopher Hanjani, Leila Shafiee Young, Adrienne M. Reid, Natasha Hubbard, Ruth E. A systematic review of frailty education programs for health care professionals |
title | A systematic review of frailty education programs for health care professionals |
title_full | A systematic review of frailty education programs for health care professionals |
title_fullStr | A systematic review of frailty education programs for health care professionals |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review of frailty education programs for health care professionals |
title_short | A systematic review of frailty education programs for health care professionals |
title_sort | systematic review of frailty education programs for health care professionals |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35801297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajag.13096 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT warrennicola asystematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals AT gordonemily asystematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals AT pearsonella asystematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals AT siskinddan asystematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals AT hilmersarahn asystematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals AT ethertonbeerchristopher asystematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals AT hanjanileilashafiee asystematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals AT youngadriennem asystematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals AT reidnatasha asystematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals AT hubbardruthe asystematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals AT warrennicola systematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals AT gordonemily systematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals AT pearsonella systematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals AT siskinddan systematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals AT hilmersarahn systematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals AT ethertonbeerchristopher systematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals AT hanjanileilashafiee systematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals AT youngadriennem systematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals AT reidnatasha systematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals AT hubbardruthe systematicreviewoffrailtyeducationprogramsforhealthcareprofessionals |