Cargando…

Thinking biases and their role in persecutory delusions: A systematic review

AIM: Thinking biases are posited to be involved in the genesis and maintenance of delusions. Persecutory delusions are one of the most commonly occurring delusional subtypes and cause substantial distress and disability to the individuals experiencing them. Their clinical relevance confers a rationa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Rossi, Giorgia, Georgiades, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35396904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eip.13292
_version_ 1785021666162638848
author De Rossi, Giorgia
Georgiades, Anna
author_facet De Rossi, Giorgia
Georgiades, Anna
author_sort De Rossi, Giorgia
collection PubMed
description AIM: Thinking biases are posited to be involved in the genesis and maintenance of delusions. Persecutory delusions are one of the most commonly occurring delusional subtypes and cause substantial distress and disability to the individuals experiencing them. Their clinical relevance confers a rationale for investigating them. Particularly, this review aims to elucidate which cognitive biases are involved in their development and persistence. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Global Health were searched from the year 2000 to June 2020. A formal narrative synthesis was employed to report the findings and a quality assessment of included studies was conducted. RESULTS: Twenty five studies were included. Overall, 18 thinking biases were identified. Hostility and trustworthiness judgement biases appeared to be specific to persecutory delusions while jumping to conclusions, self‐serving attributional biases and belief inflexibility were proposed to be more closely related to other delusional subtypes. While the majority of the biases identified were suggested to be involved in delusion maintenance, hostility biases, need for closure and personalizing attributional biases were believed to also have aetiological influences. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that some cognitive biases are specific to paranoid psychosis and appear to be involved in the formation and/or persistence of persecutory delusions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10084105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100841052023-04-11 Thinking biases and their role in persecutory delusions: A systematic review De Rossi, Giorgia Georgiades, Anna Early Interv Psychiatry Review AIM: Thinking biases are posited to be involved in the genesis and maintenance of delusions. Persecutory delusions are one of the most commonly occurring delusional subtypes and cause substantial distress and disability to the individuals experiencing them. Their clinical relevance confers a rationale for investigating them. Particularly, this review aims to elucidate which cognitive biases are involved in their development and persistence. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Global Health were searched from the year 2000 to June 2020. A formal narrative synthesis was employed to report the findings and a quality assessment of included studies was conducted. RESULTS: Twenty five studies were included. Overall, 18 thinking biases were identified. Hostility and trustworthiness judgement biases appeared to be specific to persecutory delusions while jumping to conclusions, self‐serving attributional biases and belief inflexibility were proposed to be more closely related to other delusional subtypes. While the majority of the biases identified were suggested to be involved in delusion maintenance, hostility biases, need for closure and personalizing attributional biases were believed to also have aetiological influences. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that some cognitive biases are specific to paranoid psychosis and appear to be involved in the formation and/or persistence of persecutory delusions. Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2022-04-09 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10084105/ /pubmed/35396904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eip.13292 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Early Intervention in Psychiatry published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review
De Rossi, Giorgia
Georgiades, Anna
Thinking biases and their role in persecutory delusions: A systematic review
title Thinking biases and their role in persecutory delusions: A systematic review
title_full Thinking biases and their role in persecutory delusions: A systematic review
title_fullStr Thinking biases and their role in persecutory delusions: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Thinking biases and their role in persecutory delusions: A systematic review
title_short Thinking biases and their role in persecutory delusions: A systematic review
title_sort thinking biases and their role in persecutory delusions: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35396904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eip.13292
work_keys_str_mv AT derossigiorgia thinkingbiasesandtheirroleinpersecutorydelusionsasystematicreview
AT georgiadesanna thinkingbiasesandtheirroleinpersecutorydelusionsasystematicreview