Cargando…
Thinking biases and their role in persecutory delusions: A systematic review
AIM: Thinking biases are posited to be involved in the genesis and maintenance of delusions. Persecutory delusions are one of the most commonly occurring delusional subtypes and cause substantial distress and disability to the individuals experiencing them. Their clinical relevance confers a rationa...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35396904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eip.13292 |
_version_ | 1785021666162638848 |
---|---|
author | De Rossi, Giorgia Georgiades, Anna |
author_facet | De Rossi, Giorgia Georgiades, Anna |
author_sort | De Rossi, Giorgia |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: Thinking biases are posited to be involved in the genesis and maintenance of delusions. Persecutory delusions are one of the most commonly occurring delusional subtypes and cause substantial distress and disability to the individuals experiencing them. Their clinical relevance confers a rationale for investigating them. Particularly, this review aims to elucidate which cognitive biases are involved in their development and persistence. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Global Health were searched from the year 2000 to June 2020. A formal narrative synthesis was employed to report the findings and a quality assessment of included studies was conducted. RESULTS: Twenty five studies were included. Overall, 18 thinking biases were identified. Hostility and trustworthiness judgement biases appeared to be specific to persecutory delusions while jumping to conclusions, self‐serving attributional biases and belief inflexibility were proposed to be more closely related to other delusional subtypes. While the majority of the biases identified were suggested to be involved in delusion maintenance, hostility biases, need for closure and personalizing attributional biases were believed to also have aetiological influences. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that some cognitive biases are specific to paranoid psychosis and appear to be involved in the formation and/or persistence of persecutory delusions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10084105 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100841052023-04-11 Thinking biases and their role in persecutory delusions: A systematic review De Rossi, Giorgia Georgiades, Anna Early Interv Psychiatry Review AIM: Thinking biases are posited to be involved in the genesis and maintenance of delusions. Persecutory delusions are one of the most commonly occurring delusional subtypes and cause substantial distress and disability to the individuals experiencing them. Their clinical relevance confers a rationale for investigating them. Particularly, this review aims to elucidate which cognitive biases are involved in their development and persistence. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Global Health were searched from the year 2000 to June 2020. A formal narrative synthesis was employed to report the findings and a quality assessment of included studies was conducted. RESULTS: Twenty five studies were included. Overall, 18 thinking biases were identified. Hostility and trustworthiness judgement biases appeared to be specific to persecutory delusions while jumping to conclusions, self‐serving attributional biases and belief inflexibility were proposed to be more closely related to other delusional subtypes. While the majority of the biases identified were suggested to be involved in delusion maintenance, hostility biases, need for closure and personalizing attributional biases were believed to also have aetiological influences. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that some cognitive biases are specific to paranoid psychosis and appear to be involved in the formation and/or persistence of persecutory delusions. Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2022-04-09 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10084105/ /pubmed/35396904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eip.13292 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Early Intervention in Psychiatry published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Review De Rossi, Giorgia Georgiades, Anna Thinking biases and their role in persecutory delusions: A systematic review |
title | Thinking biases and their role in persecutory delusions: A systematic review |
title_full | Thinking biases and their role in persecutory delusions: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Thinking biases and their role in persecutory delusions: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Thinking biases and their role in persecutory delusions: A systematic review |
title_short | Thinking biases and their role in persecutory delusions: A systematic review |
title_sort | thinking biases and their role in persecutory delusions: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35396904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eip.13292 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT derossigiorgia thinkingbiasesandtheirroleinpersecutorydelusionsasystematicreview AT georgiadesanna thinkingbiasesandtheirroleinpersecutorydelusionsasystematicreview |