Cargando…

Prevalence of repeat faecal immunochemical testing in symptomatic patients attending primary care

AIM: The faecal immunochemical test (FIT) for faecal haemoglobin (f‐Hb) helps determine the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and has been integrated into symptomatic referral pathways. ‘Safety netting’ advice includes considering referral for persistent symptoms, but no published data exists on repea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnstone, Mark S., MacLeod, Campbell, Digby, Jayne, Al‐Azzawi, Yassir, Pang, Grace, Watson, Angus J. M., Strachan, Judith, Mowat, Craig, McSorley, Stephen T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35776684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/codi.16240
_version_ 1785021666384936960
author Johnstone, Mark S.
MacLeod, Campbell
Digby, Jayne
Al‐Azzawi, Yassir
Pang, Grace
Watson, Angus J. M.
Strachan, Judith
Mowat, Craig
McSorley, Stephen T.
author_facet Johnstone, Mark S.
MacLeod, Campbell
Digby, Jayne
Al‐Azzawi, Yassir
Pang, Grace
Watson, Angus J. M.
Strachan, Judith
Mowat, Craig
McSorley, Stephen T.
author_sort Johnstone, Mark S.
collection PubMed
description AIM: The faecal immunochemical test (FIT) for faecal haemoglobin (f‐Hb) helps determine the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and has been integrated into symptomatic referral pathways. ‘Safety netting’ advice includes considering referral for persistent symptoms, but no published data exists on repeated FITs. We aimed to examine the prevalence of serial FITs in primary care and CRC risk in these patients. METHOD: A multicentre, retrospective, observational study was conducted of patients with two or more consecutive f‐Hb results within a year from three Scottish Health Boards which utilize FIT in primary care. Cancer registry data ensured identification of CRC cases. RESULTS: Overall, 135 396 FIT results were reviewed, of which 12 359 were serial results reported within 12 months (9.1%), derived from 5761 patients. Of these, 42 (0.7%) were diagnosed with CRC. A total of 3487 (60.5%) patients had two f‐Hb < 10 μg/g, 944 (16.4%) had f‐Hb ≥ 10 μg/g followed by <10 μg/g, 704 (12.2%) f‐Hb < 10 μg/g followed by ≥10 μg/g and 626 (10.9%) had two f‐Hb ≥ 10 μg/g. The CRC rate in each group was 0.1%, 0.4%, 1.4% and 4.0%, respectively. Seven hundred and thirty four patients submitted more than two FITs within a year. The likelihood of one or more f‐Hb ≥ 10 μg/g rose from 40.4% with two samples to 100% with six, while the CRC rate fell from 0.8% to 0%. CONCLUSION: Serial FITs within a year account for 9.1% of all results in our Boards. CRC prevalence amongst symptomatic patients with serial FIT is lower than in single‐FIT cohorts. Performing two FITs within a year for patients with persistent symptoms effectively acts as a safety net, while performing more than two within this timeframe is unlikely to be beneficial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10084108
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100841082023-04-11 Prevalence of repeat faecal immunochemical testing in symptomatic patients attending primary care Johnstone, Mark S. MacLeod, Campbell Digby, Jayne Al‐Azzawi, Yassir Pang, Grace Watson, Angus J. M. Strachan, Judith Mowat, Craig McSorley, Stephen T. Colorectal Dis Original Articles AIM: The faecal immunochemical test (FIT) for faecal haemoglobin (f‐Hb) helps determine the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and has been integrated into symptomatic referral pathways. ‘Safety netting’ advice includes considering referral for persistent symptoms, but no published data exists on repeated FITs. We aimed to examine the prevalence of serial FITs in primary care and CRC risk in these patients. METHOD: A multicentre, retrospective, observational study was conducted of patients with two or more consecutive f‐Hb results within a year from three Scottish Health Boards which utilize FIT in primary care. Cancer registry data ensured identification of CRC cases. RESULTS: Overall, 135 396 FIT results were reviewed, of which 12 359 were serial results reported within 12 months (9.1%), derived from 5761 patients. Of these, 42 (0.7%) were diagnosed with CRC. A total of 3487 (60.5%) patients had two f‐Hb < 10 μg/g, 944 (16.4%) had f‐Hb ≥ 10 μg/g followed by <10 μg/g, 704 (12.2%) f‐Hb < 10 μg/g followed by ≥10 μg/g and 626 (10.9%) had two f‐Hb ≥ 10 μg/g. The CRC rate in each group was 0.1%, 0.4%, 1.4% and 4.0%, respectively. Seven hundred and thirty four patients submitted more than two FITs within a year. The likelihood of one or more f‐Hb ≥ 10 μg/g rose from 40.4% with two samples to 100% with six, while the CRC rate fell from 0.8% to 0%. CONCLUSION: Serial FITs within a year account for 9.1% of all results in our Boards. CRC prevalence amongst symptomatic patients with serial FIT is lower than in single‐FIT cohorts. Performing two FITs within a year for patients with persistent symptoms effectively acts as a safety net, while performing more than two within this timeframe is unlikely to be beneficial. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-18 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10084108/ /pubmed/35776684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/codi.16240 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Colorectal Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Johnstone, Mark S.
MacLeod, Campbell
Digby, Jayne
Al‐Azzawi, Yassir
Pang, Grace
Watson, Angus J. M.
Strachan, Judith
Mowat, Craig
McSorley, Stephen T.
Prevalence of repeat faecal immunochemical testing in symptomatic patients attending primary care
title Prevalence of repeat faecal immunochemical testing in symptomatic patients attending primary care
title_full Prevalence of repeat faecal immunochemical testing in symptomatic patients attending primary care
title_fullStr Prevalence of repeat faecal immunochemical testing in symptomatic patients attending primary care
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of repeat faecal immunochemical testing in symptomatic patients attending primary care
title_short Prevalence of repeat faecal immunochemical testing in symptomatic patients attending primary care
title_sort prevalence of repeat faecal immunochemical testing in symptomatic patients attending primary care
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35776684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/codi.16240
work_keys_str_mv AT johnstonemarks prevalenceofrepeatfaecalimmunochemicaltestinginsymptomaticpatientsattendingprimarycare
AT macleodcampbell prevalenceofrepeatfaecalimmunochemicaltestinginsymptomaticpatientsattendingprimarycare
AT digbyjayne prevalenceofrepeatfaecalimmunochemicaltestinginsymptomaticpatientsattendingprimarycare
AT alazzawiyassir prevalenceofrepeatfaecalimmunochemicaltestinginsymptomaticpatientsattendingprimarycare
AT panggrace prevalenceofrepeatfaecalimmunochemicaltestinginsymptomaticpatientsattendingprimarycare
AT watsonangusjm prevalenceofrepeatfaecalimmunochemicaltestinginsymptomaticpatientsattendingprimarycare
AT strachanjudith prevalenceofrepeatfaecalimmunochemicaltestinginsymptomaticpatientsattendingprimarycare
AT mowatcraig prevalenceofrepeatfaecalimmunochemicaltestinginsymptomaticpatientsattendingprimarycare
AT mcsorleystephent prevalenceofrepeatfaecalimmunochemicaltestinginsymptomaticpatientsattendingprimarycare