Cargando…

Shape differences in the semitendinosus following tendon harvesting for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Following hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), muscle length, cross‐sectional area, and volume are reduced. However, these discrete measures of morphology do not account for complex three‐dimensional muscle shape. The primary aim of this study was to determine betwee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: du Moulin, William, Bourne, Matthew, Diamond, Laura E., Konrath, Jason, Vertullo, Christopher, Lloyd, David, Saxby, David J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35434842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jor.25337
_version_ 1785021674062610432
author du Moulin, William
Bourne, Matthew
Diamond, Laura E.
Konrath, Jason
Vertullo, Christopher
Lloyd, David
Saxby, David J.
author_facet du Moulin, William
Bourne, Matthew
Diamond, Laura E.
Konrath, Jason
Vertullo, Christopher
Lloyd, David
Saxby, David J.
author_sort du Moulin, William
collection PubMed
description Following hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), muscle length, cross‐sectional area, and volume are reduced. However, these discrete measures of morphology do not account for complex three‐dimensional muscle shape. The primary aim of this study was to determine between‐limb semitendinosus (ST) shape and regional morphology differences in young adults following tendon harvest for ACLR and to compare these differences with those in healthy controls. In this cross‐sectional study, magnetic resonance imaging was performed on 18 individuals with unilateral ACLR and 18 healthy controls. Bilaterally, ST muscles were segmented, and shape differences assessed between limbs and compared between groups using Jaccard index (0–1) and Hausdorff distance (mm). Length (cm), peak cross‐sectional area (cm(2)), and volume (cm(3)) were measured for the entire muscle and proximal, middle, and distal regions, and compared between limbs and groups. Compared to healthy controls, the ACLR group had significantly (p < 0.001, Cohen's d = −2.33) lower bilateral ST shape similarity and shape deviation was significantly (p < 0.001, d = 2.12) greater. Shape deviation was greatest within the distal region of the ACLR (Hausdorff: 23.1 ± 8.68 mm). Compared to both the uninjured contralateral limb and healthy controls, deficits in peak cross‐sectional area and volume in ACLR group were largest in proximal (p < 0.001, d = −2.52 to −1.28) and middle (p < 0.001, d = −1.81 to −1.04) regions of the ST. Overall, shape analysis provides unique insight into regional adaptations in ST morphology post‐ACLR. Findings highlight morphological features in distal ST not identified by traditional discrete morphology measures. Clinical significance: Following ACLR, risk of a secondary knee or primary hamstring injury has been reported to be between 2‐to‐5 times greater compared to those without ACLR. Change in semitendinosus (ST) shape following ACLR may affect force transmission and distribution within the hamstrings and might contribute to persistent deficits in knee flexor and internal rotator strength.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10084140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100841402023-04-11 Shape differences in the semitendinosus following tendon harvesting for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction du Moulin, William Bourne, Matthew Diamond, Laura E. Konrath, Jason Vertullo, Christopher Lloyd, David Saxby, David J. J Orthop Res Research Articles Following hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), muscle length, cross‐sectional area, and volume are reduced. However, these discrete measures of morphology do not account for complex three‐dimensional muscle shape. The primary aim of this study was to determine between‐limb semitendinosus (ST) shape and regional morphology differences in young adults following tendon harvest for ACLR and to compare these differences with those in healthy controls. In this cross‐sectional study, magnetic resonance imaging was performed on 18 individuals with unilateral ACLR and 18 healthy controls. Bilaterally, ST muscles were segmented, and shape differences assessed between limbs and compared between groups using Jaccard index (0–1) and Hausdorff distance (mm). Length (cm), peak cross‐sectional area (cm(2)), and volume (cm(3)) were measured for the entire muscle and proximal, middle, and distal regions, and compared between limbs and groups. Compared to healthy controls, the ACLR group had significantly (p < 0.001, Cohen's d = −2.33) lower bilateral ST shape similarity and shape deviation was significantly (p < 0.001, d = 2.12) greater. Shape deviation was greatest within the distal region of the ACLR (Hausdorff: 23.1 ± 8.68 mm). Compared to both the uninjured contralateral limb and healthy controls, deficits in peak cross‐sectional area and volume in ACLR group were largest in proximal (p < 0.001, d = −2.52 to −1.28) and middle (p < 0.001, d = −1.81 to −1.04) regions of the ST. Overall, shape analysis provides unique insight into regional adaptations in ST morphology post‐ACLR. Findings highlight morphological features in distal ST not identified by traditional discrete morphology measures. Clinical significance: Following ACLR, risk of a secondary knee or primary hamstring injury has been reported to be between 2‐to‐5 times greater compared to those without ACLR. Change in semitendinosus (ST) shape following ACLR may affect force transmission and distribution within the hamstrings and might contribute to persistent deficits in knee flexor and internal rotator strength. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-17 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10084140/ /pubmed/35434842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jor.25337 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research® published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
du Moulin, William
Bourne, Matthew
Diamond, Laura E.
Konrath, Jason
Vertullo, Christopher
Lloyd, David
Saxby, David J.
Shape differences in the semitendinosus following tendon harvesting for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title Shape differences in the semitendinosus following tendon harvesting for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_full Shape differences in the semitendinosus following tendon harvesting for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_fullStr Shape differences in the semitendinosus following tendon harvesting for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Shape differences in the semitendinosus following tendon harvesting for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_short Shape differences in the semitendinosus following tendon harvesting for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_sort shape differences in the semitendinosus following tendon harvesting for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35434842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jor.25337
work_keys_str_mv AT dumoulinwilliam shapedifferencesinthesemitendinosusfollowingtendonharvestingforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT bournematthew shapedifferencesinthesemitendinosusfollowingtendonharvestingforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT diamondlaurae shapedifferencesinthesemitendinosusfollowingtendonharvestingforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT konrathjason shapedifferencesinthesemitendinosusfollowingtendonharvestingforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT vertullochristopher shapedifferencesinthesemitendinosusfollowingtendonharvestingforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT lloyddavid shapedifferencesinthesemitendinosusfollowingtendonharvestingforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT saxbydavidj shapedifferencesinthesemitendinosusfollowingtendonharvestingforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction