Cargando…

Urban‐rural disparities in childhood obesogenic environments in the United States: Application of differing rural definitions

BACKGROUND: Research is needed that identifies environmental resource disparities and applies multiple rural definitions. Therefore, this study aims to examine urban‐rural differences in food and physical activity (PA) environment resource availability by applying several commonly used rural definit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wende, Marilyn E., Meyer, M. Renée Umstattd, Abildso, Christiaan G., Davis, Kara, Kaczynski, Andrew T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35635492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12677
_version_ 1785021679382036480
author Wende, Marilyn E.
Meyer, M. Renée Umstattd
Abildso, Christiaan G.
Davis, Kara
Kaczynski, Andrew T.
author_facet Wende, Marilyn E.
Meyer, M. Renée Umstattd
Abildso, Christiaan G.
Davis, Kara
Kaczynski, Andrew T.
author_sort Wende, Marilyn E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Research is needed that identifies environmental resource disparities and applies multiple rural definitions. Therefore, this study aims to examine urban‐rural differences in food and physical activity (PA) environment resource availability by applying several commonly used rural definitions. We also examine differences in resource availability within urban‐rural categories that are typically aggregated. METHODS: Six food environment variables (access to grocery/superstores, farmers' markets, fast food, full‐service restaurants, convenience stores, and breastfeeding‐friendly facilities) and 4 PA environment variables (access to exercise opportunities and schools, walkability, and violent crimes) were included in the childhood obesogenic environment index (COEI). Total COEI, PA environment, and food environment index scores were generated by calculating the average percentile for related variables. US Department of Agriculture Urban Influence Codes, Office of Management and Budget codes, Rural‐Urban Continuum Codes, Census Bureau Population Estimates for percent rural, and Rural Urban Commuting Area Codes were used. One‐way ANOVA was used to detect urban‐rural differences. RESULTS: The greatest urban‐rural disparities in COEI (F=310.2, P<.0001) and PA environment (F=562.5, P<.0001) were seen using RUCC codes. For food environments, the greatest urban‐rural disparities were seen using Census Bureau percent rural categories (food: F=24.9, P<.0001). Comparing remote rural categories, differences were seen for food environments (F=3.1, P=.0270) and PA environments (F=10.2, P<.0001). Comparing metro‐adjacent rural categories, differences were seen for PA environment (F=4.7, P=.0090). CONCLUSION: Findings inform future research on urban and rural environments by outlining major differences between urban‐rural classifications in identifying disparities in access to health‐promoting resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10084162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100841622023-04-11 Urban‐rural disparities in childhood obesogenic environments in the United States: Application of differing rural definitions Wende, Marilyn E. Meyer, M. Renée Umstattd Abildso, Christiaan G. Davis, Kara Kaczynski, Andrew T. J Rural Health Maternal, Prenatal, and Child Health BACKGROUND: Research is needed that identifies environmental resource disparities and applies multiple rural definitions. Therefore, this study aims to examine urban‐rural differences in food and physical activity (PA) environment resource availability by applying several commonly used rural definitions. We also examine differences in resource availability within urban‐rural categories that are typically aggregated. METHODS: Six food environment variables (access to grocery/superstores, farmers' markets, fast food, full‐service restaurants, convenience stores, and breastfeeding‐friendly facilities) and 4 PA environment variables (access to exercise opportunities and schools, walkability, and violent crimes) were included in the childhood obesogenic environment index (COEI). Total COEI, PA environment, and food environment index scores were generated by calculating the average percentile for related variables. US Department of Agriculture Urban Influence Codes, Office of Management and Budget codes, Rural‐Urban Continuum Codes, Census Bureau Population Estimates for percent rural, and Rural Urban Commuting Area Codes were used. One‐way ANOVA was used to detect urban‐rural differences. RESULTS: The greatest urban‐rural disparities in COEI (F=310.2, P<.0001) and PA environment (F=562.5, P<.0001) were seen using RUCC codes. For food environments, the greatest urban‐rural disparities were seen using Census Bureau percent rural categories (food: F=24.9, P<.0001). Comparing remote rural categories, differences were seen for food environments (F=3.1, P=.0270) and PA environments (F=10.2, P<.0001). Comparing metro‐adjacent rural categories, differences were seen for PA environment (F=4.7, P=.0090). CONCLUSION: Findings inform future research on urban and rural environments by outlining major differences between urban‐rural classifications in identifying disparities in access to health‐promoting resources. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-30 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10084162/ /pubmed/35635492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12677 Text en © 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Rural Health published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of National Rural Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Maternal, Prenatal, and Child Health
Wende, Marilyn E.
Meyer, M. Renée Umstattd
Abildso, Christiaan G.
Davis, Kara
Kaczynski, Andrew T.
Urban‐rural disparities in childhood obesogenic environments in the United States: Application of differing rural definitions
title Urban‐rural disparities in childhood obesogenic environments in the United States: Application of differing rural definitions
title_full Urban‐rural disparities in childhood obesogenic environments in the United States: Application of differing rural definitions
title_fullStr Urban‐rural disparities in childhood obesogenic environments in the United States: Application of differing rural definitions
title_full_unstemmed Urban‐rural disparities in childhood obesogenic environments in the United States: Application of differing rural definitions
title_short Urban‐rural disparities in childhood obesogenic environments in the United States: Application of differing rural definitions
title_sort urban‐rural disparities in childhood obesogenic environments in the united states: application of differing rural definitions
topic Maternal, Prenatal, and Child Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35635492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12677
work_keys_str_mv AT wendemarilyne urbanruraldisparitiesinchildhoodobesogenicenvironmentsintheunitedstatesapplicationofdifferingruraldefinitions
AT meyermreneeumstattd urbanruraldisparitiesinchildhoodobesogenicenvironmentsintheunitedstatesapplicationofdifferingruraldefinitions
AT abildsochristiaang urbanruraldisparitiesinchildhoodobesogenicenvironmentsintheunitedstatesapplicationofdifferingruraldefinitions
AT daviskara urbanruraldisparitiesinchildhoodobesogenicenvironmentsintheunitedstatesapplicationofdifferingruraldefinitions
AT kaczynskiandrewt urbanruraldisparitiesinchildhoodobesogenicenvironmentsintheunitedstatesapplicationofdifferingruraldefinitions