Cargando…
Urban‐rural disparities in childhood obesogenic environments in the United States: Application of differing rural definitions
BACKGROUND: Research is needed that identifies environmental resource disparities and applies multiple rural definitions. Therefore, this study aims to examine urban‐rural differences in food and physical activity (PA) environment resource availability by applying several commonly used rural definit...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35635492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12677 |
_version_ | 1785021679382036480 |
---|---|
author | Wende, Marilyn E. Meyer, M. Renée Umstattd Abildso, Christiaan G. Davis, Kara Kaczynski, Andrew T. |
author_facet | Wende, Marilyn E. Meyer, M. Renée Umstattd Abildso, Christiaan G. Davis, Kara Kaczynski, Andrew T. |
author_sort | Wende, Marilyn E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Research is needed that identifies environmental resource disparities and applies multiple rural definitions. Therefore, this study aims to examine urban‐rural differences in food and physical activity (PA) environment resource availability by applying several commonly used rural definitions. We also examine differences in resource availability within urban‐rural categories that are typically aggregated. METHODS: Six food environment variables (access to grocery/superstores, farmers' markets, fast food, full‐service restaurants, convenience stores, and breastfeeding‐friendly facilities) and 4 PA environment variables (access to exercise opportunities and schools, walkability, and violent crimes) were included in the childhood obesogenic environment index (COEI). Total COEI, PA environment, and food environment index scores were generated by calculating the average percentile for related variables. US Department of Agriculture Urban Influence Codes, Office of Management and Budget codes, Rural‐Urban Continuum Codes, Census Bureau Population Estimates for percent rural, and Rural Urban Commuting Area Codes were used. One‐way ANOVA was used to detect urban‐rural differences. RESULTS: The greatest urban‐rural disparities in COEI (F=310.2, P<.0001) and PA environment (F=562.5, P<.0001) were seen using RUCC codes. For food environments, the greatest urban‐rural disparities were seen using Census Bureau percent rural categories (food: F=24.9, P<.0001). Comparing remote rural categories, differences were seen for food environments (F=3.1, P=.0270) and PA environments (F=10.2, P<.0001). Comparing metro‐adjacent rural categories, differences were seen for PA environment (F=4.7, P=.0090). CONCLUSION: Findings inform future research on urban and rural environments by outlining major differences between urban‐rural classifications in identifying disparities in access to health‐promoting resources. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10084162 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100841622023-04-11 Urban‐rural disparities in childhood obesogenic environments in the United States: Application of differing rural definitions Wende, Marilyn E. Meyer, M. Renée Umstattd Abildso, Christiaan G. Davis, Kara Kaczynski, Andrew T. J Rural Health Maternal, Prenatal, and Child Health BACKGROUND: Research is needed that identifies environmental resource disparities and applies multiple rural definitions. Therefore, this study aims to examine urban‐rural differences in food and physical activity (PA) environment resource availability by applying several commonly used rural definitions. We also examine differences in resource availability within urban‐rural categories that are typically aggregated. METHODS: Six food environment variables (access to grocery/superstores, farmers' markets, fast food, full‐service restaurants, convenience stores, and breastfeeding‐friendly facilities) and 4 PA environment variables (access to exercise opportunities and schools, walkability, and violent crimes) were included in the childhood obesogenic environment index (COEI). Total COEI, PA environment, and food environment index scores were generated by calculating the average percentile for related variables. US Department of Agriculture Urban Influence Codes, Office of Management and Budget codes, Rural‐Urban Continuum Codes, Census Bureau Population Estimates for percent rural, and Rural Urban Commuting Area Codes were used. One‐way ANOVA was used to detect urban‐rural differences. RESULTS: The greatest urban‐rural disparities in COEI (F=310.2, P<.0001) and PA environment (F=562.5, P<.0001) were seen using RUCC codes. For food environments, the greatest urban‐rural disparities were seen using Census Bureau percent rural categories (food: F=24.9, P<.0001). Comparing remote rural categories, differences were seen for food environments (F=3.1, P=.0270) and PA environments (F=10.2, P<.0001). Comparing metro‐adjacent rural categories, differences were seen for PA environment (F=4.7, P=.0090). CONCLUSION: Findings inform future research on urban and rural environments by outlining major differences between urban‐rural classifications in identifying disparities in access to health‐promoting resources. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-30 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10084162/ /pubmed/35635492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12677 Text en © 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Rural Health published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of National Rural Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Maternal, Prenatal, and Child Health Wende, Marilyn E. Meyer, M. Renée Umstattd Abildso, Christiaan G. Davis, Kara Kaczynski, Andrew T. Urban‐rural disparities in childhood obesogenic environments in the United States: Application of differing rural definitions |
title | Urban‐rural disparities in childhood obesogenic environments in the United States: Application of differing rural definitions |
title_full | Urban‐rural disparities in childhood obesogenic environments in the United States: Application of differing rural definitions |
title_fullStr | Urban‐rural disparities in childhood obesogenic environments in the United States: Application of differing rural definitions |
title_full_unstemmed | Urban‐rural disparities in childhood obesogenic environments in the United States: Application of differing rural definitions |
title_short | Urban‐rural disparities in childhood obesogenic environments in the United States: Application of differing rural definitions |
title_sort | urban‐rural disparities in childhood obesogenic environments in the united states: application of differing rural definitions |
topic | Maternal, Prenatal, and Child Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35635492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12677 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wendemarilyne urbanruraldisparitiesinchildhoodobesogenicenvironmentsintheunitedstatesapplicationofdifferingruraldefinitions AT meyermreneeumstattd urbanruraldisparitiesinchildhoodobesogenicenvironmentsintheunitedstatesapplicationofdifferingruraldefinitions AT abildsochristiaang urbanruraldisparitiesinchildhoodobesogenicenvironmentsintheunitedstatesapplicationofdifferingruraldefinitions AT daviskara urbanruraldisparitiesinchildhoodobesogenicenvironmentsintheunitedstatesapplicationofdifferingruraldefinitions AT kaczynskiandrewt urbanruraldisparitiesinchildhoodobesogenicenvironmentsintheunitedstatesapplicationofdifferingruraldefinitions |