Cargando…
Spatial+: A novel approach to spatial confounding
In spatial regression models, collinearity between covariates and spatial effects can lead to significant bias in effect estimates. This problem, known as spatial confounding, is encountered modeling forestry data to assess the effect of temperature on tree health. Reliable inference is difficult as...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35258102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/biom.13656 |
_version_ | 1785021688107237376 |
---|---|
author | Dupont, Emiko Wood, Simon N. Augustin, Nicole H. |
author_facet | Dupont, Emiko Wood, Simon N. Augustin, Nicole H. |
author_sort | Dupont, Emiko |
collection | PubMed |
description | In spatial regression models, collinearity between covariates and spatial effects can lead to significant bias in effect estimates. This problem, known as spatial confounding, is encountered modeling forestry data to assess the effect of temperature on tree health. Reliable inference is difficult as results depend on whether or not spatial effects are included in the model. We propose a novel approach, spatial+, for dealing with spatial confounding when the covariate of interest is spatially dependent but not fully determined by spatial location. Using a thin plate spline model formulation we see that, in this case, the bias in covariate effect estimates is a direct result of spatial smoothing. Spatial+ reduces the sensitivity of the estimates to smoothing by replacing the covariates by their residuals after spatial dependence has been regressed away. Through asymptotic analysis we show that spatial+ avoids the bias problems of the spatial model. This is also demonstrated in a simulation study. Spatial+ is straightforward to implement using existing software and, as the response variable is the same as that of the spatial model, standard model selection criteria can be used for comparisons. A major advantage of the method is also that it extends to models with non‐Gaussian response distributions. Finally, while our results are derived in a thin plate spline setting, the spatial+ methodology transfers easily to other spatial model formulations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10084199 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100841992023-04-11 Spatial+: A novel approach to spatial confounding Dupont, Emiko Wood, Simon N. Augustin, Nicole H. Biometrics Biometric Methodology In spatial regression models, collinearity between covariates and spatial effects can lead to significant bias in effect estimates. This problem, known as spatial confounding, is encountered modeling forestry data to assess the effect of temperature on tree health. Reliable inference is difficult as results depend on whether or not spatial effects are included in the model. We propose a novel approach, spatial+, for dealing with spatial confounding when the covariate of interest is spatially dependent but not fully determined by spatial location. Using a thin plate spline model formulation we see that, in this case, the bias in covariate effect estimates is a direct result of spatial smoothing. Spatial+ reduces the sensitivity of the estimates to smoothing by replacing the covariates by their residuals after spatial dependence has been regressed away. Through asymptotic analysis we show that spatial+ avoids the bias problems of the spatial model. This is also demonstrated in a simulation study. Spatial+ is straightforward to implement using existing software and, as the response variable is the same as that of the spatial model, standard model selection criteria can be used for comparisons. A major advantage of the method is also that it extends to models with non‐Gaussian response distributions. Finally, while our results are derived in a thin plate spline setting, the spatial+ methodology transfers easily to other spatial model formulations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-30 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10084199/ /pubmed/35258102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/biom.13656 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Biometrics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Biometric Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Biometric Methodology Dupont, Emiko Wood, Simon N. Augustin, Nicole H. Spatial+: A novel approach to spatial confounding |
title | Spatial+: A novel approach to spatial confounding |
title_full | Spatial+: A novel approach to spatial confounding |
title_fullStr | Spatial+: A novel approach to spatial confounding |
title_full_unstemmed | Spatial+: A novel approach to spatial confounding |
title_short | Spatial+: A novel approach to spatial confounding |
title_sort | spatial+: a novel approach to spatial confounding |
topic | Biometric Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35258102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/biom.13656 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dupontemiko spatialanovelapproachtospatialconfounding AT woodsimonn spatialanovelapproachtospatialconfounding AT augustinnicoleh spatialanovelapproachtospatialconfounding |