Cargando…
Evaluation of the NANDA International, Inc. diagnostic classification in Spain: Development and validation of the EVALUAN‐I tool
PURPOSE: To develop and validate a tool to evaluate the NANDA International, Inc. diagnostic classification. METHODS: The tool, EVALUAN‐I, was validated in a non‐probabilistic sample (N = 460) on Spanish Registered Nurses (September–December 2019) in two phases. First, design and construct the instr...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35420728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12366 |
_version_ | 1785021688335826944 |
---|---|
author | Rodríguez‐Suárez, Claudio Alberto Hernández‐De Luis, María Naira Mariscal‐Crespo, María Isabel Camacho‐Bejarano, Rafaela |
author_facet | Rodríguez‐Suárez, Claudio Alberto Hernández‐De Luis, María Naira Mariscal‐Crespo, María Isabel Camacho‐Bejarano, Rafaela |
author_sort | Rodríguez‐Suárez, Claudio Alberto |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To develop and validate a tool to evaluate the NANDA International, Inc. diagnostic classification. METHODS: The tool, EVALUAN‐I, was validated in a non‐probabilistic sample (N = 460) on Spanish Registered Nurses (September–December 2019) in two phases. First, design and construct the instrument in three steps: (1) literature review to define the construct focusing on the orientation toward nursing concepts and theoretical foundations, the level of scientific evidence, the structural configuration, the applicability, the nurses’ clinical reasoning skills, and the attitudes toward nursing diagnosis, (2) substantiation of the questionnaire items and design according to the criteria for a diagnostic classification, (3) expert test to establish the face validity and content validity. The second phase revolved around (4) conducting a pilot test and measuring the temporal stability (test‐retest) and Cohen's kappa coefficient; assessing psychometric properties by measuring (5) reliability (internal consistency using Cronbach alpha and interfactor correlation) and (6) construct validity (exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis). The manuscript follows the STROBE checklist. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee with registration number 2019‐190‐1. FINDINGS: EVALUAN‐I displayed moderate test‐retest stability, adequate construct validity, and excellent reliability. The confirmatory factor analysis provided evidence about the configuration of EVALUAN‐I in relation to nine analytical dimensions: clinical competence, nurses’ reasoning skills, attitudes towards nursing diagnosis, discipline's central concepts, classification's contents, physiopathological attributes, level of scientific evidence, diagnostic precision, and conceptual correspondence between terminologies. CONCLUSIONS: EVALUAN‐I is a valid and reliable instrument, which can be used to improve the epistemological, normative, and intuitive configuration of NANDA International, Inc. in a structured, systematic manner. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Comprehensive evaluation of NANDA International, Inc. in different clinical settings around the world using a validated instrument, like EVALUAN‐I, would allow strengths and weaknesses to be identified and contribute to the classification's development and practical application. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10084200 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100842002023-04-11 Evaluation of the NANDA International, Inc. diagnostic classification in Spain: Development and validation of the EVALUAN‐I tool Rodríguez‐Suárez, Claudio Alberto Hernández‐De Luis, María Naira Mariscal‐Crespo, María Isabel Camacho‐Bejarano, Rafaela Int J Nurs Knowl Original Articles PURPOSE: To develop and validate a tool to evaluate the NANDA International, Inc. diagnostic classification. METHODS: The tool, EVALUAN‐I, was validated in a non‐probabilistic sample (N = 460) on Spanish Registered Nurses (September–December 2019) in two phases. First, design and construct the instrument in three steps: (1) literature review to define the construct focusing on the orientation toward nursing concepts and theoretical foundations, the level of scientific evidence, the structural configuration, the applicability, the nurses’ clinical reasoning skills, and the attitudes toward nursing diagnosis, (2) substantiation of the questionnaire items and design according to the criteria for a diagnostic classification, (3) expert test to establish the face validity and content validity. The second phase revolved around (4) conducting a pilot test and measuring the temporal stability (test‐retest) and Cohen's kappa coefficient; assessing psychometric properties by measuring (5) reliability (internal consistency using Cronbach alpha and interfactor correlation) and (6) construct validity (exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis). The manuscript follows the STROBE checklist. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee with registration number 2019‐190‐1. FINDINGS: EVALUAN‐I displayed moderate test‐retest stability, adequate construct validity, and excellent reliability. The confirmatory factor analysis provided evidence about the configuration of EVALUAN‐I in relation to nine analytical dimensions: clinical competence, nurses’ reasoning skills, attitudes towards nursing diagnosis, discipline's central concepts, classification's contents, physiopathological attributes, level of scientific evidence, diagnostic precision, and conceptual correspondence between terminologies. CONCLUSIONS: EVALUAN‐I is a valid and reliable instrument, which can be used to improve the epistemological, normative, and intuitive configuration of NANDA International, Inc. in a structured, systematic manner. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Comprehensive evaluation of NANDA International, Inc. in different clinical settings around the world using a validated instrument, like EVALUAN‐I, would allow strengths and weaknesses to be identified and contribute to the classification's development and practical application. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-14 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10084200/ /pubmed/35420728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12366 Text en © 2022 The Authors. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of NANDA International. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Rodríguez‐Suárez, Claudio Alberto Hernández‐De Luis, María Naira Mariscal‐Crespo, María Isabel Camacho‐Bejarano, Rafaela Evaluation of the NANDA International, Inc. diagnostic classification in Spain: Development and validation of the EVALUAN‐I tool |
title | Evaluation of the NANDA International, Inc. diagnostic classification in Spain: Development and validation of the EVALUAN‐I tool |
title_full | Evaluation of the NANDA International, Inc. diagnostic classification in Spain: Development and validation of the EVALUAN‐I tool |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the NANDA International, Inc. diagnostic classification in Spain: Development and validation of the EVALUAN‐I tool |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the NANDA International, Inc. diagnostic classification in Spain: Development and validation of the EVALUAN‐I tool |
title_short | Evaluation of the NANDA International, Inc. diagnostic classification in Spain: Development and validation of the EVALUAN‐I tool |
title_sort | evaluation of the nanda international, inc. diagnostic classification in spain: development and validation of the evaluan‐i tool |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35420728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12366 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rodriguezsuarezclaudioalberto evaluationofthenandainternationalincdiagnosticclassificationinspaindevelopmentandvalidationoftheevaluanitool AT hernandezdeluismarianaira evaluationofthenandainternationalincdiagnosticclassificationinspaindevelopmentandvalidationoftheevaluanitool AT mariscalcrespomariaisabel evaluationofthenandainternationalincdiagnosticclassificationinspaindevelopmentandvalidationoftheevaluanitool AT camachobejaranorafaela evaluationofthenandainternationalincdiagnosticclassificationinspaindevelopmentandvalidationoftheevaluanitool |