Cargando…

Large variation in radiation therapy fractionation for multiple myeloma in Australia

AIM: To evaluate the patterns of use of different radiation therapy (RT) fractionation for multiple myeloma (MM) bone disease. METHODS: This is a population‐based cohort of patients with MM who had RT between 2012 and 2017 as captured in the statewide Victorian Radiotherapy Minimum Data Set in Austr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ong, Wee Loon, MacManus, Michael, Milne, Roger L., Foroudi, Farshad, Millar, Jeremy L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35599450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajco.13783
_version_ 1785021694030643200
author Ong, Wee Loon
MacManus, Michael
Milne, Roger L.
Foroudi, Farshad
Millar, Jeremy L.
author_facet Ong, Wee Loon
MacManus, Michael
Milne, Roger L.
Foroudi, Farshad
Millar, Jeremy L.
author_sort Ong, Wee Loon
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate the patterns of use of different radiation therapy (RT) fractionation for multiple myeloma (MM) bone disease. METHODS: This is a population‐based cohort of patients with MM who had RT between 2012 and 2017 as captured in the statewide Victorian Radiotherapy Minimum Data Set in Australia. Data linkage was performed to identify subsets of RT delivered within 3 months of death. RT fractionation was classified into four groups: single‐fraction (SFRT), 2–5, 6–10, and > 10 fractions. Changes in RT fractionation use over time were evaluated with the Cochran–Armitage test for trend. Factors associated with RT fractionation were evaluated using multivariate logistic regressions. RESULTS: Nine hundred and sixty‐seven courses of RT were delivered in 623 patients. The proportion of SFRT, 2–5, 6–10 and > 10 fractions RT was 18%, 47%, 28%, and 7%, respectively. There was an increase in the use of 2–5 fractions, from 48% in 2012 to 60% in 2017 (p‐trend < .001), with corresponding decrease in the use of 6–10 fractions, from 26% in 2012 to 20% in 2017 (p‐trend = .003). Nine percent (40/430) of RT courses at private institutions were SFRT, compared to 25% (135/537) in public institutions (p < .001). In multivariate analyses, treatment in private institution was the strongest predictor of multifraction RT use. SFRT use was more common closer to the end of life–18%, 14%, and 33% of RT within 2–3, 1–2, < 1 month of death, respectively. CONCLUSION: There is increasing use of shorter course RT (2–5 fractions) for MM over time. SFRT use remains low, with large variation in practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10084224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100842242023-04-11 Large variation in radiation therapy fractionation for multiple myeloma in Australia Ong, Wee Loon MacManus, Michael Milne, Roger L. Foroudi, Farshad Millar, Jeremy L. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol Original Articles AIM: To evaluate the patterns of use of different radiation therapy (RT) fractionation for multiple myeloma (MM) bone disease. METHODS: This is a population‐based cohort of patients with MM who had RT between 2012 and 2017 as captured in the statewide Victorian Radiotherapy Minimum Data Set in Australia. Data linkage was performed to identify subsets of RT delivered within 3 months of death. RT fractionation was classified into four groups: single‐fraction (SFRT), 2–5, 6–10, and > 10 fractions. Changes in RT fractionation use over time were evaluated with the Cochran–Armitage test for trend. Factors associated with RT fractionation were evaluated using multivariate logistic regressions. RESULTS: Nine hundred and sixty‐seven courses of RT were delivered in 623 patients. The proportion of SFRT, 2–5, 6–10 and > 10 fractions RT was 18%, 47%, 28%, and 7%, respectively. There was an increase in the use of 2–5 fractions, from 48% in 2012 to 60% in 2017 (p‐trend < .001), with corresponding decrease in the use of 6–10 fractions, from 26% in 2012 to 20% in 2017 (p‐trend = .003). Nine percent (40/430) of RT courses at private institutions were SFRT, compared to 25% (135/537) in public institutions (p < .001). In multivariate analyses, treatment in private institution was the strongest predictor of multifraction RT use. SFRT use was more common closer to the end of life–18%, 14%, and 33% of RT within 2–3, 1–2, < 1 month of death, respectively. CONCLUSION: There is increasing use of shorter course RT (2–5 fractions) for MM over time. SFRT use remains low, with large variation in practice. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-22 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10084224/ /pubmed/35599450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajco.13783 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ong, Wee Loon
MacManus, Michael
Milne, Roger L.
Foroudi, Farshad
Millar, Jeremy L.
Large variation in radiation therapy fractionation for multiple myeloma in Australia
title Large variation in radiation therapy fractionation for multiple myeloma in Australia
title_full Large variation in radiation therapy fractionation for multiple myeloma in Australia
title_fullStr Large variation in radiation therapy fractionation for multiple myeloma in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Large variation in radiation therapy fractionation for multiple myeloma in Australia
title_short Large variation in radiation therapy fractionation for multiple myeloma in Australia
title_sort large variation in radiation therapy fractionation for multiple myeloma in australia
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35599450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajco.13783
work_keys_str_mv AT ongweeloon largevariationinradiationtherapyfractionationformultiplemyelomainaustralia
AT macmanusmichael largevariationinradiationtherapyfractionationformultiplemyelomainaustralia
AT milnerogerl largevariationinradiationtherapyfractionationformultiplemyelomainaustralia
AT foroudifarshad largevariationinradiationtherapyfractionationformultiplemyelomainaustralia
AT millarjeremyl largevariationinradiationtherapyfractionationformultiplemyelomainaustralia