Cargando…
Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in elderly patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: IKEMA subgroup analysis
In this subgroup analysis of the randomized, Phase 3 IKEMA study (NCT03275285), we evaluated efficacy and safety of the anti‐CD38 monoclonal antibody isatuximab (Isa) in combination with carfilzomib‐dexamethasone (Isa‐Kd) versus Kd in older (≥70 years of age, n = 86) and younger (<70 years, n = 2...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35653225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hon.3038 |
_version_ | 1785021705546104832 |
---|---|
author | Facon, Thierry Moreau, Philippe Martin, Thomas G. Spicka, Ivan Oriol, Albert Koh, Youngil Lim, Andrew Mikala, Gabor Rosiñol, Laura Yağci, Münci Cavo, Michele Yong, Kwee Risse, Marie‐Laure Asset, Gaëlle Schwab, Sandrine Martinez, Gracia |
author_facet | Facon, Thierry Moreau, Philippe Martin, Thomas G. Spicka, Ivan Oriol, Albert Koh, Youngil Lim, Andrew Mikala, Gabor Rosiñol, Laura Yağci, Münci Cavo, Michele Yong, Kwee Risse, Marie‐Laure Asset, Gaëlle Schwab, Sandrine Martinez, Gracia |
author_sort | Facon, Thierry |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this subgroup analysis of the randomized, Phase 3 IKEMA study (NCT03275285), we evaluated efficacy and safety of the anti‐CD38 monoclonal antibody isatuximab (Isa) in combination with carfilzomib‐dexamethasone (Isa‐Kd) versus Kd in older (≥70 years of age, n = 86) and younger (<70 years, n = 216) patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). Patients received Isa 10 mg/kg intravenously weekly for 4 weeks, then every 2 weeks in the Isa‐Kd arm, and approved schedule of carfilzomib (twice weekly) and dexamethasone in both study arms. Primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS); key secondary efficacy endpoints included rates of overall response (ORR), very good partial response or better (≥VGPR), minimal residual disease negativity (MRD–), and complete response (CR). Addition of Isa to Kd resulted in improved PFS in elderly patients (hazard ratio, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.18–0.75]) consistent with the significant PFS improvement observed in the overall IKEMA population. Treatment with Isa‐Kd improved depth of response versus Kd, with higher rates of ≥VGPR (73.1% vs. 55.9%), MRD– (23.1% vs. 11.8%), and CR (38.5% vs. 23.5%). Although the incidence of grade ≥3 treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was higher in Isa‐Kd, the incidence of serious TEAEs was similar between arms. Fewer elderly patients definitively discontinued treatment due to TEAEs in Isa‐Kd than Kd: 11.8% versus 23.5%. In conclusion, Isa‐Kd provides a consistent benefit versus Kd in elderly patients, with a manageable safety profile, and represents a new treatment option for patients with relapsed MM, independent of age. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10084276 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100842762023-04-11 Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in elderly patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: IKEMA subgroup analysis Facon, Thierry Moreau, Philippe Martin, Thomas G. Spicka, Ivan Oriol, Albert Koh, Youngil Lim, Andrew Mikala, Gabor Rosiñol, Laura Yağci, Münci Cavo, Michele Yong, Kwee Risse, Marie‐Laure Asset, Gaëlle Schwab, Sandrine Martinez, Gracia Hematol Oncol Original Articles In this subgroup analysis of the randomized, Phase 3 IKEMA study (NCT03275285), we evaluated efficacy and safety of the anti‐CD38 monoclonal antibody isatuximab (Isa) in combination with carfilzomib‐dexamethasone (Isa‐Kd) versus Kd in older (≥70 years of age, n = 86) and younger (<70 years, n = 216) patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). Patients received Isa 10 mg/kg intravenously weekly for 4 weeks, then every 2 weeks in the Isa‐Kd arm, and approved schedule of carfilzomib (twice weekly) and dexamethasone in both study arms. Primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS); key secondary efficacy endpoints included rates of overall response (ORR), very good partial response or better (≥VGPR), minimal residual disease negativity (MRD–), and complete response (CR). Addition of Isa to Kd resulted in improved PFS in elderly patients (hazard ratio, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.18–0.75]) consistent with the significant PFS improvement observed in the overall IKEMA population. Treatment with Isa‐Kd improved depth of response versus Kd, with higher rates of ≥VGPR (73.1% vs. 55.9%), MRD– (23.1% vs. 11.8%), and CR (38.5% vs. 23.5%). Although the incidence of grade ≥3 treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was higher in Isa‐Kd, the incidence of serious TEAEs was similar between arms. Fewer elderly patients definitively discontinued treatment due to TEAEs in Isa‐Kd than Kd: 11.8% versus 23.5%. In conclusion, Isa‐Kd provides a consistent benefit versus Kd in elderly patients, with a manageable safety profile, and represents a new treatment option for patients with relapsed MM, independent of age. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-08 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10084276/ /pubmed/35653225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hon.3038 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Hematological Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Facon, Thierry Moreau, Philippe Martin, Thomas G. Spicka, Ivan Oriol, Albert Koh, Youngil Lim, Andrew Mikala, Gabor Rosiñol, Laura Yağci, Münci Cavo, Michele Yong, Kwee Risse, Marie‐Laure Asset, Gaëlle Schwab, Sandrine Martinez, Gracia Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in elderly patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: IKEMA subgroup analysis |
title | Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in elderly patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: IKEMA subgroup analysis |
title_full | Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in elderly patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: IKEMA subgroup analysis |
title_fullStr | Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in elderly patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: IKEMA subgroup analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in elderly patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: IKEMA subgroup analysis |
title_short | Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in elderly patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: IKEMA subgroup analysis |
title_sort | isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in elderly patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: ikema subgroup analysis |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35653225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hon.3038 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT faconthierry isatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneversuscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinelderlypatientswithrelapsedmultiplemyelomaikemasubgroupanalysis AT moreauphilippe isatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneversuscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinelderlypatientswithrelapsedmultiplemyelomaikemasubgroupanalysis AT martinthomasg isatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneversuscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinelderlypatientswithrelapsedmultiplemyelomaikemasubgroupanalysis AT spickaivan isatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneversuscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinelderlypatientswithrelapsedmultiplemyelomaikemasubgroupanalysis AT oriolalbert isatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneversuscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinelderlypatientswithrelapsedmultiplemyelomaikemasubgroupanalysis AT kohyoungil isatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneversuscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinelderlypatientswithrelapsedmultiplemyelomaikemasubgroupanalysis AT limandrew isatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneversuscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinelderlypatientswithrelapsedmultiplemyelomaikemasubgroupanalysis AT mikalagabor isatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneversuscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinelderlypatientswithrelapsedmultiplemyelomaikemasubgroupanalysis AT rosinollaura isatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneversuscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinelderlypatientswithrelapsedmultiplemyelomaikemasubgroupanalysis AT yagcimunci isatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneversuscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinelderlypatientswithrelapsedmultiplemyelomaikemasubgroupanalysis AT cavomichele isatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneversuscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinelderlypatientswithrelapsedmultiplemyelomaikemasubgroupanalysis AT yongkwee isatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneversuscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinelderlypatientswithrelapsedmultiplemyelomaikemasubgroupanalysis AT rissemarielaure isatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneversuscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinelderlypatientswithrelapsedmultiplemyelomaikemasubgroupanalysis AT assetgaelle isatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneversuscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinelderlypatientswithrelapsedmultiplemyelomaikemasubgroupanalysis AT schwabsandrine isatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneversuscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinelderlypatientswithrelapsedmultiplemyelomaikemasubgroupanalysis AT martinezgracia isatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneversuscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinelderlypatientswithrelapsedmultiplemyelomaikemasubgroupanalysis |