Cargando…

Telehealth delivery of paediatric rehabilitation for children with neurodisability: A mixed methods realist evaluation of contexts, mechanisms and outcomes

BACKGROUND: Teledelivery of rehabilitation services has been proposed as a cost‐effective option for supporting children with neurodisability and their families. However, little is understood of the conditions that support uptake of telehealth in paediatric rehabilitation, what is delivered during t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graham, Fiona, Williman, Jonathan, Sutherland, Lena, Wijninckx, Morgan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35778916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cch.13028
_version_ 1785021728001359872
author Graham, Fiona
Williman, Jonathan
Sutherland, Lena
Wijninckx, Morgan
author_facet Graham, Fiona
Williman, Jonathan
Sutherland, Lena
Wijninckx, Morgan
author_sort Graham, Fiona
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Teledelivery of rehabilitation services has been proposed as a cost‐effective option for supporting children with neurodisability and their families. However, little is understood of the conditions that support uptake of telehealth in paediatric rehabilitation, what is delivered during telehealth or perceptions of its outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify the context, process and outcomes of telehealth for children with neurodisability and their families. A secondary objective was to identify if variations in these aspects of telehealth occurred for Māori, the indigenous people of New Zealand. METHOD: A mixed‐methods, three phase, realist evaluation identified context‐mechanism‐outcome configurations (CMOcs) of telehealth. In Phase 1, the Determinants of Implementation Behaviour Questionnaire indicated factors affecting practitioner uptake of telehealth (Context). In Phase 2, a casenote audit identified ‘practitioner input’ during telehealth (Mechanism). Phase 3 interviews with practitioners and parents explored ‘parent response’ to telehealth and practitioner and parent perceptions of its value (Mechanism and Outcomes). Subgroup analyses for Māori were planned. RESULTS: From Phase 1, practitioners (29/37, 78%) intended to use telehealth; however, few did so regularly (7/37, 22%). Positive experiences of telehealth were described by all practitioners (n = 5) and families (n = 7) in Phase 3. CMOcs explained that practitioners' offering of telehealth occurred when practitioners were confident, valued access to therapy over the familiarity of in‐person delivery, and when practitioners used coaching‐style communication. Parents were receptive to telehealth when they trusted practitioners, felt listened to and were offered telehealth as a choice. When telehealth occurred, access to therapy was timely and more consistent than in‐person delivery. Child outcomes appeared to be positive. Confidence in offering telehealth to Māori was low. CONCLUSIONS: Initiatives to improve uptake of telehealth in paediatric rehabilitation should focus on creating conditions for practitioner implementation. Training in telehealth should include engagement with Māori. Adequate workspace and workplace culture change are required if telehealth is to be offered beyond the current ‘early adopters’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10084377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100843772023-04-11 Telehealth delivery of paediatric rehabilitation for children with neurodisability: A mixed methods realist evaluation of contexts, mechanisms and outcomes Graham, Fiona Williman, Jonathan Sutherland, Lena Wijninckx, Morgan Child Care Health Dev Research Articles BACKGROUND: Teledelivery of rehabilitation services has been proposed as a cost‐effective option for supporting children with neurodisability and their families. However, little is understood of the conditions that support uptake of telehealth in paediatric rehabilitation, what is delivered during telehealth or perceptions of its outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify the context, process and outcomes of telehealth for children with neurodisability and their families. A secondary objective was to identify if variations in these aspects of telehealth occurred for Māori, the indigenous people of New Zealand. METHOD: A mixed‐methods, three phase, realist evaluation identified context‐mechanism‐outcome configurations (CMOcs) of telehealth. In Phase 1, the Determinants of Implementation Behaviour Questionnaire indicated factors affecting practitioner uptake of telehealth (Context). In Phase 2, a casenote audit identified ‘practitioner input’ during telehealth (Mechanism). Phase 3 interviews with practitioners and parents explored ‘parent response’ to telehealth and practitioner and parent perceptions of its value (Mechanism and Outcomes). Subgroup analyses for Māori were planned. RESULTS: From Phase 1, practitioners (29/37, 78%) intended to use telehealth; however, few did so regularly (7/37, 22%). Positive experiences of telehealth were described by all practitioners (n = 5) and families (n = 7) in Phase 3. CMOcs explained that practitioners' offering of telehealth occurred when practitioners were confident, valued access to therapy over the familiarity of in‐person delivery, and when practitioners used coaching‐style communication. Parents were receptive to telehealth when they trusted practitioners, felt listened to and were offered telehealth as a choice. When telehealth occurred, access to therapy was timely and more consistent than in‐person delivery. Child outcomes appeared to be positive. Confidence in offering telehealth to Māori was low. CONCLUSIONS: Initiatives to improve uptake of telehealth in paediatric rehabilitation should focus on creating conditions for practitioner implementation. Training in telehealth should include engagement with Māori. Adequate workspace and workplace culture change are required if telehealth is to be offered beyond the current ‘early adopters’. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-10 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10084377/ /pubmed/35778916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cch.13028 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Child: Care, Health and Development published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Graham, Fiona
Williman, Jonathan
Sutherland, Lena
Wijninckx, Morgan
Telehealth delivery of paediatric rehabilitation for children with neurodisability: A mixed methods realist evaluation of contexts, mechanisms and outcomes
title Telehealth delivery of paediatric rehabilitation for children with neurodisability: A mixed methods realist evaluation of contexts, mechanisms and outcomes
title_full Telehealth delivery of paediatric rehabilitation for children with neurodisability: A mixed methods realist evaluation of contexts, mechanisms and outcomes
title_fullStr Telehealth delivery of paediatric rehabilitation for children with neurodisability: A mixed methods realist evaluation of contexts, mechanisms and outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Telehealth delivery of paediatric rehabilitation for children with neurodisability: A mixed methods realist evaluation of contexts, mechanisms and outcomes
title_short Telehealth delivery of paediatric rehabilitation for children with neurodisability: A mixed methods realist evaluation of contexts, mechanisms and outcomes
title_sort telehealth delivery of paediatric rehabilitation for children with neurodisability: a mixed methods realist evaluation of contexts, mechanisms and outcomes
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35778916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cch.13028
work_keys_str_mv AT grahamfiona telehealthdeliveryofpaediatricrehabilitationforchildrenwithneurodisabilityamixedmethodsrealistevaluationofcontextsmechanismsandoutcomes
AT willimanjonathan telehealthdeliveryofpaediatricrehabilitationforchildrenwithneurodisabilityamixedmethodsrealistevaluationofcontextsmechanismsandoutcomes
AT sutherlandlena telehealthdeliveryofpaediatricrehabilitationforchildrenwithneurodisabilityamixedmethodsrealistevaluationofcontextsmechanismsandoutcomes
AT wijninckxmorgan telehealthdeliveryofpaediatricrehabilitationforchildrenwithneurodisabilityamixedmethodsrealistevaluationofcontextsmechanismsandoutcomes