Cargando…

Evaluation of automated radiostereometric image registration in total knee arthroplasty utilizing a synthetic‐based and a CT‐based volumetric model

Radiostereometic analysis (RSA) is an accurate method for rigid body pose (position and orientation) in three‐dimensional space. Traditionally, RSA is based on insertion of periprosthetic tantalum markers and manual implant contour selection which limit clinically application. We propose an automate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petersen, Emil Toft, Vind, Tobias Dahl, Jürgens‐Lahnstein, Jonathan Hugo, Christensen, Rasmus, de Raedt, Sepp, Brüel, Annemarie, Rytter, Søren, Andersen, Michael Skipper, Stilling, Maiken
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35532010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jor.25359
_version_ 1785021737540255744
author Petersen, Emil Toft
Vind, Tobias Dahl
Jürgens‐Lahnstein, Jonathan Hugo
Christensen, Rasmus
de Raedt, Sepp
Brüel, Annemarie
Rytter, Søren
Andersen, Michael Skipper
Stilling, Maiken
author_facet Petersen, Emil Toft
Vind, Tobias Dahl
Jürgens‐Lahnstein, Jonathan Hugo
Christensen, Rasmus
de Raedt, Sepp
Brüel, Annemarie
Rytter, Søren
Andersen, Michael Skipper
Stilling, Maiken
author_sort Petersen, Emil Toft
collection PubMed
description Radiostereometic analysis (RSA) is an accurate method for rigid body pose (position and orientation) in three‐dimensional space. Traditionally, RSA is based on insertion of periprosthetic tantalum markers and manual implant contour selection which limit clinically application. We propose an automated image registration technique utilizing digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) of computed tomography (CT) volumetric bone models (autorsa‐bone) as a substitute for tantalum markers. Furthermore, an automated synthetic volumetric representation of total knee arthroplasty implant models (autorsa‐volume) to improve previous silhouette‐projection methods (autorsa‐surface). As reference, we investigated the accuracy of implanted tantalum markers (marker) or a conventional manually contour‐based method (mbrsa) for the femur and tibia. The data are presented as mean (standard deviation). The autorsa‐bone method displayed similar accuracy of −0.013 (0.075) mm compared to the gold standard method (marker) of −0.013 (0.085). The autorsa‐volume with 0.034 (0.106) mm did not markedly improve the autorsa‐surface with 0.002 (0.129) mm, and none of these reached the mbrsa method of −0.009 (0.094) mm. In conclusion, marker‐free RSA is feasible with similar accuracy as gold standard utilizing DRR and CT obtained volumetric bone models. Furthermore, utilizing synthetic generated volumetric implant models could not improve the silhouette‐based method. However, with a slight loss of accuracy the autorsa methods provide a feasible automated alternative to the semi‐automated method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10084430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100844302023-04-11 Evaluation of automated radiostereometric image registration in total knee arthroplasty utilizing a synthetic‐based and a CT‐based volumetric model Petersen, Emil Toft Vind, Tobias Dahl Jürgens‐Lahnstein, Jonathan Hugo Christensen, Rasmus de Raedt, Sepp Brüel, Annemarie Rytter, Søren Andersen, Michael Skipper Stilling, Maiken J Orthop Res Research Articles Radiostereometic analysis (RSA) is an accurate method for rigid body pose (position and orientation) in three‐dimensional space. Traditionally, RSA is based on insertion of periprosthetic tantalum markers and manual implant contour selection which limit clinically application. We propose an automated image registration technique utilizing digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) of computed tomography (CT) volumetric bone models (autorsa‐bone) as a substitute for tantalum markers. Furthermore, an automated synthetic volumetric representation of total knee arthroplasty implant models (autorsa‐volume) to improve previous silhouette‐projection methods (autorsa‐surface). As reference, we investigated the accuracy of implanted tantalum markers (marker) or a conventional manually contour‐based method (mbrsa) for the femur and tibia. The data are presented as mean (standard deviation). The autorsa‐bone method displayed similar accuracy of −0.013 (0.075) mm compared to the gold standard method (marker) of −0.013 (0.085). The autorsa‐volume with 0.034 (0.106) mm did not markedly improve the autorsa‐surface with 0.002 (0.129) mm, and none of these reached the mbrsa method of −0.009 (0.094) mm. In conclusion, marker‐free RSA is feasible with similar accuracy as gold standard utilizing DRR and CT obtained volumetric bone models. Furthermore, utilizing synthetic generated volumetric implant models could not improve the silhouette‐based method. However, with a slight loss of accuracy the autorsa methods provide a feasible automated alternative to the semi‐automated method. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-27 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10084430/ /pubmed/35532010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jor.25359 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research® published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Petersen, Emil Toft
Vind, Tobias Dahl
Jürgens‐Lahnstein, Jonathan Hugo
Christensen, Rasmus
de Raedt, Sepp
Brüel, Annemarie
Rytter, Søren
Andersen, Michael Skipper
Stilling, Maiken
Evaluation of automated radiostereometric image registration in total knee arthroplasty utilizing a synthetic‐based and a CT‐based volumetric model
title Evaluation of automated radiostereometric image registration in total knee arthroplasty utilizing a synthetic‐based and a CT‐based volumetric model
title_full Evaluation of automated radiostereometric image registration in total knee arthroplasty utilizing a synthetic‐based and a CT‐based volumetric model
title_fullStr Evaluation of automated radiostereometric image registration in total knee arthroplasty utilizing a synthetic‐based and a CT‐based volumetric model
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of automated radiostereometric image registration in total knee arthroplasty utilizing a synthetic‐based and a CT‐based volumetric model
title_short Evaluation of automated radiostereometric image registration in total knee arthroplasty utilizing a synthetic‐based and a CT‐based volumetric model
title_sort evaluation of automated radiostereometric image registration in total knee arthroplasty utilizing a synthetic‐based and a ct‐based volumetric model
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35532010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jor.25359
work_keys_str_mv AT petersenemiltoft evaluationofautomatedradiostereometricimageregistrationintotalkneearthroplastyutilizingasyntheticbasedandactbasedvolumetricmodel
AT vindtobiasdahl evaluationofautomatedradiostereometricimageregistrationintotalkneearthroplastyutilizingasyntheticbasedandactbasedvolumetricmodel
AT jurgenslahnsteinjonathanhugo evaluationofautomatedradiostereometricimageregistrationintotalkneearthroplastyutilizingasyntheticbasedandactbasedvolumetricmodel
AT christensenrasmus evaluationofautomatedradiostereometricimageregistrationintotalkneearthroplastyutilizingasyntheticbasedandactbasedvolumetricmodel
AT deraedtsepp evaluationofautomatedradiostereometricimageregistrationintotalkneearthroplastyutilizingasyntheticbasedandactbasedvolumetricmodel
AT bruelannemarie evaluationofautomatedradiostereometricimageregistrationintotalkneearthroplastyutilizingasyntheticbasedandactbasedvolumetricmodel
AT ryttersøren evaluationofautomatedradiostereometricimageregistrationintotalkneearthroplastyutilizingasyntheticbasedandactbasedvolumetricmodel
AT andersenmichaelskipper evaluationofautomatedradiostereometricimageregistrationintotalkneearthroplastyutilizingasyntheticbasedandactbasedvolumetricmodel
AT stillingmaiken evaluationofautomatedradiostereometricimageregistrationintotalkneearthroplastyutilizingasyntheticbasedandactbasedvolumetricmodel