Cargando…
Evaluation of automated radiostereometric image registration in total knee arthroplasty utilizing a synthetic‐based and a CT‐based volumetric model
Radiostereometic analysis (RSA) is an accurate method for rigid body pose (position and orientation) in three‐dimensional space. Traditionally, RSA is based on insertion of periprosthetic tantalum markers and manual implant contour selection which limit clinically application. We propose an automate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35532010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jor.25359 |
_version_ | 1785021737540255744 |
---|---|
author | Petersen, Emil Toft Vind, Tobias Dahl Jürgens‐Lahnstein, Jonathan Hugo Christensen, Rasmus de Raedt, Sepp Brüel, Annemarie Rytter, Søren Andersen, Michael Skipper Stilling, Maiken |
author_facet | Petersen, Emil Toft Vind, Tobias Dahl Jürgens‐Lahnstein, Jonathan Hugo Christensen, Rasmus de Raedt, Sepp Brüel, Annemarie Rytter, Søren Andersen, Michael Skipper Stilling, Maiken |
author_sort | Petersen, Emil Toft |
collection | PubMed |
description | Radiostereometic analysis (RSA) is an accurate method for rigid body pose (position and orientation) in three‐dimensional space. Traditionally, RSA is based on insertion of periprosthetic tantalum markers and manual implant contour selection which limit clinically application. We propose an automated image registration technique utilizing digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) of computed tomography (CT) volumetric bone models (autorsa‐bone) as a substitute for tantalum markers. Furthermore, an automated synthetic volumetric representation of total knee arthroplasty implant models (autorsa‐volume) to improve previous silhouette‐projection methods (autorsa‐surface). As reference, we investigated the accuracy of implanted tantalum markers (marker) or a conventional manually contour‐based method (mbrsa) for the femur and tibia. The data are presented as mean (standard deviation). The autorsa‐bone method displayed similar accuracy of −0.013 (0.075) mm compared to the gold standard method (marker) of −0.013 (0.085). The autorsa‐volume with 0.034 (0.106) mm did not markedly improve the autorsa‐surface with 0.002 (0.129) mm, and none of these reached the mbrsa method of −0.009 (0.094) mm. In conclusion, marker‐free RSA is feasible with similar accuracy as gold standard utilizing DRR and CT obtained volumetric bone models. Furthermore, utilizing synthetic generated volumetric implant models could not improve the silhouette‐based method. However, with a slight loss of accuracy the autorsa methods provide a feasible automated alternative to the semi‐automated method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10084430 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100844302023-04-11 Evaluation of automated radiostereometric image registration in total knee arthroplasty utilizing a synthetic‐based and a CT‐based volumetric model Petersen, Emil Toft Vind, Tobias Dahl Jürgens‐Lahnstein, Jonathan Hugo Christensen, Rasmus de Raedt, Sepp Brüel, Annemarie Rytter, Søren Andersen, Michael Skipper Stilling, Maiken J Orthop Res Research Articles Radiostereometic analysis (RSA) is an accurate method for rigid body pose (position and orientation) in three‐dimensional space. Traditionally, RSA is based on insertion of periprosthetic tantalum markers and manual implant contour selection which limit clinically application. We propose an automated image registration technique utilizing digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) of computed tomography (CT) volumetric bone models (autorsa‐bone) as a substitute for tantalum markers. Furthermore, an automated synthetic volumetric representation of total knee arthroplasty implant models (autorsa‐volume) to improve previous silhouette‐projection methods (autorsa‐surface). As reference, we investigated the accuracy of implanted tantalum markers (marker) or a conventional manually contour‐based method (mbrsa) for the femur and tibia. The data are presented as mean (standard deviation). The autorsa‐bone method displayed similar accuracy of −0.013 (0.075) mm compared to the gold standard method (marker) of −0.013 (0.085). The autorsa‐volume with 0.034 (0.106) mm did not markedly improve the autorsa‐surface with 0.002 (0.129) mm, and none of these reached the mbrsa method of −0.009 (0.094) mm. In conclusion, marker‐free RSA is feasible with similar accuracy as gold standard utilizing DRR and CT obtained volumetric bone models. Furthermore, utilizing synthetic generated volumetric implant models could not improve the silhouette‐based method. However, with a slight loss of accuracy the autorsa methods provide a feasible automated alternative to the semi‐automated method. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-27 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10084430/ /pubmed/35532010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jor.25359 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research® published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Petersen, Emil Toft Vind, Tobias Dahl Jürgens‐Lahnstein, Jonathan Hugo Christensen, Rasmus de Raedt, Sepp Brüel, Annemarie Rytter, Søren Andersen, Michael Skipper Stilling, Maiken Evaluation of automated radiostereometric image registration in total knee arthroplasty utilizing a synthetic‐based and a CT‐based volumetric model |
title | Evaluation of automated radiostereometric image registration in total knee arthroplasty utilizing a synthetic‐based and a CT‐based volumetric model |
title_full | Evaluation of automated radiostereometric image registration in total knee arthroplasty utilizing a synthetic‐based and a CT‐based volumetric model |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of automated radiostereometric image registration in total knee arthroplasty utilizing a synthetic‐based and a CT‐based volumetric model |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of automated radiostereometric image registration in total knee arthroplasty utilizing a synthetic‐based and a CT‐based volumetric model |
title_short | Evaluation of automated radiostereometric image registration in total knee arthroplasty utilizing a synthetic‐based and a CT‐based volumetric model |
title_sort | evaluation of automated radiostereometric image registration in total knee arthroplasty utilizing a synthetic‐based and a ct‐based volumetric model |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35532010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jor.25359 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petersenemiltoft evaluationofautomatedradiostereometricimageregistrationintotalkneearthroplastyutilizingasyntheticbasedandactbasedvolumetricmodel AT vindtobiasdahl evaluationofautomatedradiostereometricimageregistrationintotalkneearthroplastyutilizingasyntheticbasedandactbasedvolumetricmodel AT jurgenslahnsteinjonathanhugo evaluationofautomatedradiostereometricimageregistrationintotalkneearthroplastyutilizingasyntheticbasedandactbasedvolumetricmodel AT christensenrasmus evaluationofautomatedradiostereometricimageregistrationintotalkneearthroplastyutilizingasyntheticbasedandactbasedvolumetricmodel AT deraedtsepp evaluationofautomatedradiostereometricimageregistrationintotalkneearthroplastyutilizingasyntheticbasedandactbasedvolumetricmodel AT bruelannemarie evaluationofautomatedradiostereometricimageregistrationintotalkneearthroplastyutilizingasyntheticbasedandactbasedvolumetricmodel AT ryttersøren evaluationofautomatedradiostereometricimageregistrationintotalkneearthroplastyutilizingasyntheticbasedandactbasedvolumetricmodel AT andersenmichaelskipper evaluationofautomatedradiostereometricimageregistrationintotalkneearthroplastyutilizingasyntheticbasedandactbasedvolumetricmodel AT stillingmaiken evaluationofautomatedradiostereometricimageregistrationintotalkneearthroplastyutilizingasyntheticbasedandactbasedvolumetricmodel |