Cargando…

Animal versus plant-based protein and risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the evidence on the effect of replacing the intake of animal protein with plant protein on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) and their intermediate risk factors. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lamberg-Allardt, Christel, Bärebring, Linnea, Arnesen, Erik Kristoffer, Nwaru, Bright I., Thorisdottir, Birna, Ramel, Alfons, Söderlund, Fredrik, Dierkes, Jutta, Åkesson, Agneta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Open Academia 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37050925
http://dx.doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v67.9003
_version_ 1785021752513921024
author Lamberg-Allardt, Christel
Bärebring, Linnea
Arnesen, Erik Kristoffer
Nwaru, Bright I.
Thorisdottir, Birna
Ramel, Alfons
Söderlund, Fredrik
Dierkes, Jutta
Åkesson, Agneta
author_facet Lamberg-Allardt, Christel
Bärebring, Linnea
Arnesen, Erik Kristoffer
Nwaru, Bright I.
Thorisdottir, Birna
Ramel, Alfons
Söderlund, Fredrik
Dierkes, Jutta
Åkesson, Agneta
author_sort Lamberg-Allardt, Christel
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the evidence on the effect of replacing the intake of animal protein with plant protein on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) and their intermediate risk factors. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus up to 12th May 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or prospective cohort studies that investigated replacement of animal protein with plant protein from foods. Outcomes were CVDs, T2D, and in RCTs also the effects on blood lipids, glycemic markers, and blood pressure. Risk of bias was evaluated with the Cochrane’s RoB2, ROBINS-I, and USDA’s RoB-NObS tools. Random-effects meta-analyses assessed the effects of plant vs. animal proteins on blood lipids in RCTs. The evidence was appraised according to the World Cancer Research Fund’s criteria. RESULTS: After screening 15,090 titles/abstracts, full text of 124 papers was scrutinized in detail, from which 13 RCTs and seven cohort studies were included. Eight of the RCTs had either some concern or high risk of bias, while the corresponding evaluation of cohort studies resulted in moderate risk of bias for all seven. Meta-analyses of RCTs suggested a protective effect on total cholesterol (mean difference -0.11 mmol/L; 95% CI -0.22, -0.01) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.14 mmol/L; 95% CI -0.25, -0.02) by replacing animal protein with plant protein. The substitution of animal protein with plant protein (percentage of energy intake) in cohort studies was associated with lower CVD mortality (n = 4) and lower T2D incidence (n = 2). The evidence was considered limited-suggestive for both outcomes. CONCLUSION: Evidence that the substitution of animal protein with plant protein reduces risk of both CVD mortality and T2D incidence is limited-suggestive. Replacing animal protein with plant protein for aspects of sustainability may also be a public health strategy to lower the risk of CVD mortality and T2D.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10084508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Open Academia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100845082023-04-11 Animal versus plant-based protein and risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies Lamberg-Allardt, Christel Bärebring, Linnea Arnesen, Erik Kristoffer Nwaru, Bright I. Thorisdottir, Birna Ramel, Alfons Söderlund, Fredrik Dierkes, Jutta Åkesson, Agneta Food Nutr Res Review Article OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the evidence on the effect of replacing the intake of animal protein with plant protein on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) and their intermediate risk factors. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus up to 12th May 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or prospective cohort studies that investigated replacement of animal protein with plant protein from foods. Outcomes were CVDs, T2D, and in RCTs also the effects on blood lipids, glycemic markers, and blood pressure. Risk of bias was evaluated with the Cochrane’s RoB2, ROBINS-I, and USDA’s RoB-NObS tools. Random-effects meta-analyses assessed the effects of plant vs. animal proteins on blood lipids in RCTs. The evidence was appraised according to the World Cancer Research Fund’s criteria. RESULTS: After screening 15,090 titles/abstracts, full text of 124 papers was scrutinized in detail, from which 13 RCTs and seven cohort studies were included. Eight of the RCTs had either some concern or high risk of bias, while the corresponding evaluation of cohort studies resulted in moderate risk of bias for all seven. Meta-analyses of RCTs suggested a protective effect on total cholesterol (mean difference -0.11 mmol/L; 95% CI -0.22, -0.01) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.14 mmol/L; 95% CI -0.25, -0.02) by replacing animal protein with plant protein. The substitution of animal protein with plant protein (percentage of energy intake) in cohort studies was associated with lower CVD mortality (n = 4) and lower T2D incidence (n = 2). The evidence was considered limited-suggestive for both outcomes. CONCLUSION: Evidence that the substitution of animal protein with plant protein reduces risk of both CVD mortality and T2D incidence is limited-suggestive. Replacing animal protein with plant protein for aspects of sustainability may also be a public health strategy to lower the risk of CVD mortality and T2D. Open Academia 2023-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10084508/ /pubmed/37050925 http://dx.doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v67.9003 Text en © 2023 Christel Lamberg-Allardt et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Review Article
Lamberg-Allardt, Christel
Bärebring, Linnea
Arnesen, Erik Kristoffer
Nwaru, Bright I.
Thorisdottir, Birna
Ramel, Alfons
Söderlund, Fredrik
Dierkes, Jutta
Åkesson, Agneta
Animal versus plant-based protein and risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies
title Animal versus plant-based protein and risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies
title_full Animal versus plant-based protein and risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies
title_fullStr Animal versus plant-based protein and risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies
title_full_unstemmed Animal versus plant-based protein and risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies
title_short Animal versus plant-based protein and risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies
title_sort animal versus plant-based protein and risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37050925
http://dx.doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v67.9003
work_keys_str_mv AT lambergallardtchristel animalversusplantbasedproteinandriskofcardiovasculardiseaseandtype2diabetesasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandprospectivecohortstudies
AT barebringlinnea animalversusplantbasedproteinandriskofcardiovasculardiseaseandtype2diabetesasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandprospectivecohortstudies
AT arnesenerikkristoffer animalversusplantbasedproteinandriskofcardiovasculardiseaseandtype2diabetesasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandprospectivecohortstudies
AT nwarubrighti animalversusplantbasedproteinandriskofcardiovasculardiseaseandtype2diabetesasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandprospectivecohortstudies
AT thorisdottirbirna animalversusplantbasedproteinandriskofcardiovasculardiseaseandtype2diabetesasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandprospectivecohortstudies
AT ramelalfons animalversusplantbasedproteinandriskofcardiovasculardiseaseandtype2diabetesasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandprospectivecohortstudies
AT soderlundfredrik animalversusplantbasedproteinandriskofcardiovasculardiseaseandtype2diabetesasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandprospectivecohortstudies
AT dierkesjutta animalversusplantbasedproteinandriskofcardiovasculardiseaseandtype2diabetesasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandprospectivecohortstudies
AT akessonagneta animalversusplantbasedproteinandriskofcardiovasculardiseaseandtype2diabetesasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandprospectivecohortstudies